Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #42320
    97 143 2 S
    post #42312
    124 181 3 E
    post #42400
    91 128 1 E

    Oo123

    Member

    One of these things is not like the others,
    One of these things just doesn't belong,
    Can you tell which thing is not like the others
    By the time I finish my song?

  • |
  • -1
    •
    post #41463
    166 308 2 E
    post #39797
    174 234 7 Q

    Fluffscaler

    Member

    Not sure why someone keeps changing the rating to explicit on this. This is very much rated questionable by all definitions. It's more safe than explicit if anything.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #42183
    203 371 2 E

    FluffbuttKitty

    Member

    Imagine waking up in the morning, walking into the kitchen to get some coffee and you see this 😳😳😳

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #42314
    43 63 1 E
    post #41905
    252 420 4 E
    post #41284
    78 120 1 E
    post #41345
    26 37 2 E
    post #42100
    104 137 2 E
    post #15652
    125 227 2 E
    post #41258
    74 106 7 E

    Nocheamante

    Member

    docjoc222 said:
    i always wondered what popularized this type of pussy on this creature?

    The fact that the clitoral hood is prehensile like a puzzy tentacle that can grab a male member and do wild things makes furry fantasy go wild. I'd have to admit, that would be such a wild ride.

    Fun fact: Trancy Mik, states General Rain Silves is a full mutant among her species. Mutations include the clitoral hood, her height, she's bulkier, has heightened aggression, golden eyes, and hypersexuality. She's CONSIDERABLY larger than other sergals in every way making her valuable in battle. Rain's forked tongue was also not natural. Most sergals have a regular human-like slit, are generally in the range of human height, don't have gold eyes, and a pointed but non forked tongue (like a bird's).

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #14272
    78 145 2 E

    tangle

    Member

    day1vog said:
    We need more Trrith art. At the risk of sounding like a total degenerate, her hairy armpits, saggy balls, and embarrassed glowering expression are always like no other. I’d drop anything anytime to do whatever she wanted, no questions asked.

    I agree. She is delicious.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #42224
    104 174 3 E

    Monkeyrama

    Member

    One hand behind the back with a rope around the wrist and the other one free?
    Makes not much sense...

  • |
  • -3
    •
    post #41675
    155 246 3 E
    post #42060
    69 93 1 E
    post #42241
    83 109 2 Q
    post #42288
    188 323 6 E
    post #40341
    161 289 1 E
    post #42207
    81 149 2 E
    post #42234
    15 15 2 S
    post #42246
    133 189 3 Q
    post #41938
    178 347 1 E
    post #42241
    83 109 2 Q
    post #42246
    133 189 3 Q
    post #42234
    15 15 2 S
    post #42074
    67 107 4 E

    quicklime

    Member

    fluffscaler said:
    I would imagine you basically had to do each individually right? I think it's worth it. Also correct opinion on the cookie question.

    Yeah, each image was generated individually and pasted together at the end. Genning 5 images really isn't a big deal though, the real problems were other stuff, for one consistency. Mostly getting consistent clothing. Getting the right outfit basically added another variable to the gacha and another thing to fix in inpaint. It also started to refuse to gen any decent shirts at stage 4, so I just cut it at that point.
    And another really annoying though kinda minor thing was that the artstyle changed slightly. Between 3 and 4, as I removed the human tags, the style became way more flat with stronger lineart. I inpainted it to add more shine and stuff again, but it's still noticable to me.

    Also EasyFluff just kinda sucks at vaporeons. Pretty much every gen either had fucked up tail fins, more than three ear frills or multiples of the weird blue back frill twisting around the tail. Which is actually still the case in the 3rd picture.
    And another thing, which was my fault, was that I used hioshiru as an artist tag, which made the vaporeon fluffy. I had to inpaint all the tufts away. Vaporeon should be slick and smooth!

    Overall I still think it's quite good though. Probably the best AI TF thing I have seen yet, which was kinda my goal.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #42207
    81 149 2 E
    post #42074
    67 107 4 E

    Fluffscaler

    Member

    1001001001aa said:
    Good luck convincing anyone to make some though. This one took ages to make and was really annoying. Consistency is something AI really struggles with. I really tried to up the ante for AI TF stuff with this one, and it still has quite a few problems in my opinion.

    I would imagine you basically had to do each individually right? I think it's worth it. Also correct opinion on the cookie question.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    57 2 1 E

    Vextrius

    Member

    Sensors like this on a site like this is wild, pls dont force ppl to go through a paywall just for an ai generated image no matter how touched up it is

  • |
  • 9
    •
    post #42223
    10 11 1 S
    post #42224
    104 174 3 E
    post #42074
    67 107 4 E

    quicklime

    Member

    somerandombasitin said:
    Nice work, we need more TF sequences here, plus Vaporeon is so cute

    Good luck convincing anyone to make some though. This one took ages to make and was really annoying. Consistency is something AI really struggles with. I really tried to up the ante for AI TF stuff with this one, and it still has quite a few problems in my opinion.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #42219
    130 207 1 E
    post #40671
    35 32 2 Q
    post #41907
    39 46 4 E

    Marcus64

    Member

    aegishyena said:
    That's fair :) I'm being somewhat obnoxious anyway (the aforementioned squirrel-taur is a playable race in my D&D world, so). What do you mean by complicated... render time wise? Or just getting the prompts accurate since these things can be twitchy? I haven't found a good one that does four arms *and* taurs in the same attempt, which is why I ask.

    old pc, no money to replace it, like it takes me 8 min to generate an image or a recent pc does it in 8 sec, and when the result requires 40 tries like a certain orca, I'll let you imagine why I don't get involved in certain projects, otherwise for this type of thing the "simplest" thing is to do it in several stages, starting with a taur then modifying it by adding arms.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #42165
    14 17 1 E
    post #36576
    58 74 1 E
    post #37215
    79 118 1 E
    post #42185
    112 136 1 E
    post #42027
    71 90 3 E
    post #37773
    169 284 5 E
    post #42146
    165 292 1 E
    post #41484
    119 216 7 E
    post #42020
    184 266 3 E
    post #42035
    88 125 1 Q
    post #42122
    28 39 1 S

    Rayden

    Member

    @Wolfine
    Hey, you shouldn't attribute yourself other people generations, that's some very bad behavior, i was able to recognise that one and report it to the original Director, but i can't recognise the other one that you upload, which as this one has probably have been "stealed" by yourself.

    Please, either tag for unknow director or tag the right original director (which is not Wolfine) when you uploading other peoples content

    @Mondam, very nice picture as usual! Keep going on that great work;)

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #42118
    82 111 1 E

    Sniffeh

    Member

    I can't seem to make horse pictures this good for some reason. It keeps contorting the anatomy and making a penis come out of the vagina.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #42107
    85 123 1 E
    post #24603
    106 213 3 E
    post #35688
    173 291 3 E

    BirdLover

    Member

    Fantastic,

    I have no idea how you managed to pull off a feral Articuno. I've tried thousands of times, and I could not even get close to quality work like this. Well done!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #42099
    11 12 2 S
    post #42099
    11 12 2 S
    post #42112
    68 116 1 E

    DespairWorld

    Member

    "Due to a hacker leaking 1 uncensored image, post may slow down."
    thanks for helping him stay on schedule . xD

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #36470
    85 125 3 E
    post #41905
    252 420 4 E

    arthesis

    Member

    shallowloss said:
    Ferals in lingerie is just ALWAYS a pleasurable sight.
    Add that with a wedding context? Hoo boy.

    Yep, I'm right there with you

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #41862
    93 149 1 E
    post #40523
    111 191 2 E
    post #42020
    184 266 3 E
    post #41267
    75 130 2 E
    post #41307
    80 123 1 E
    post #39958
    100 160 5 E
    post #41391
    111 182 1 Q
    post #41396
    37 40 1 E
    post #41532
    165 240 1 E
    post #41886
    291 521 1 E
    post #41868
    80 137 1 E
    post #42058
    44 52 1 E

    kliefox

    Member

    Adding Jay Naylor's Zoe to the character ID, because of the hair, eye color, pink nose-tip, and athletic/slender build. I am aware her stripe pattern and bust size aren't quite a match, but close enough given the AI approximation.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #41763
    47 76 1 E
    post #41709
    148 222 2 E
    post #41978
    46 78 1 E
    post #42074
    67 107 4 E
    post #42069
    29 33 1 S

    Maxi22

    Member

    Ok wait…. The potential is insane… the realism is just………… wow

  • |
  • 1
    •