Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #53562
    112 143 4 E
    post #53400
    59 87 2 E
    post #53684
    68 121 2 E

    Fenix AI

    Member

    jons said:
    Multiple resulted in a pretty result

    Indeed, to be fair only the blue eye was original, the other one was edited from another picture that I preferred the look of as part of the same generation, liked the way it turned out so i put it on this picture

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #53256
    165 268 2 E
    post #53684
    68 121 2 E
    7 7 4 Q
    18 34 7 E
    post #51152
    109 173 2 E
    post #53497
    242 409 3 E
    post #50970
    93 128 7 E

    blp

    Member

    woof said:
    if she is my navigator, I'm in!

    don't forget the DOG IS MY NAVIGATOR bumper sticker!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #52994
    120 215 1 E

    Zaddha

    Member

    I don't know who posted my messages, but I'm grateful to you. I'm too lazy to tag art

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #53564
    125 175 4 Q

    oaf40

    Member

    k3y said:
    It worked, but for whatever reason it became slightly blurry... gotta work on that some more.

    I recommend you to give Canny & Depth modules a try. They make working with "real" backgrounds much easier in my experience, and the restyling capabilities are very flexible. Here's my workflow just as an example (apologies for typos as English isn't my native language):

    (before upscaling)

    1. Perhaps you found a real-life photograph you'd like to use as background but you don't like how it would look with your current styling
    2. Load the background photo into img2img, select your model. The prompt (including the negative one) should be a brief description of what's on the photo. In my experience 50-75 tokens in the positive prompt is enough. If your model uses score tags then use them here as well. Don't forget to include all your style LoRAs!
    3. If the photo is bigger than the working resolution of the model you use then downscale it using the "Resize to/by" submenu or in an external editor, this is important
    4. Sampler/steps: I use either DPM++ 2M @ 40 steps or Euler A @ 80 steps for this purpose
    5. Activate the ControlNet plugin, you'll need 2 units. First one would be Canny, second one would be Depth. As for the module files I recommend using models by Xinxir as they work the best with PDXL-based base checkpoints and mixes. You can easily find them on Hugging Face.
    6. For each unit tick the "Upload independent control image", upload the same source photo. Select the preprocessor ("canny" for Canny, "depth_midas" for Depth), make the resolution higher (bumping 512 up to 960 works fine with 16 GB of VRAM), set Control Weight to 1. Set "Ending control step" to 0.3 (Unit will self-deactivate at 30% of steps) if you use plain styles or somewhere around 0.7 if you use "realistic models". As for the two Threshold sliders for Canny I recommend trying various values to see which would preserve enough details for you, they vary for each picture you're working with. Click the smol button with the "Bang" emoji on it, save both Canny and Depth masks, set the Preprocessor to "None" and reupload freshly produced masks again - this would save you from running preprocessors every generation
    7. Play around with denoise strength, in my personal experience 0.7~0.83 works the best for plain styles.
    8. Click "Generate" (if you are on A1111 ofc) and it will get you a restyled photo that would fit your overall style.

    After you combine the picture of your character(s) with the background repeat the same procedure with following considerations:
    1. Merge the prompts for both the background and your characters, use BREAK to separate keywords
    2. Use much lower denoising strength in img2img, 0.1~0.2 should be enough to blend the background and foreground and kill some artifacts and jagged lines without affecting the details
    When done, proceed with your usual upscaling and post-upscaling routines... :P Maybe there are better alternative I don't know about yet (I'm sure as hell there are) but for me Canny&Depth were The life changers.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #53615
    37 48 2 Q

    ZeroOverZero

    Member

    The ruffled chest feathers sticking out adds this extra layer of detail that brings thoughts of the tactile sensation of feathers to my imagination. Or in other words, it really adds to the fantasy.

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #53159
    117 191 3 E

    Jelloponies

    Admin

    september said:
    Do you post your works somewhere else?

    Hiya!
    I sometimes post stuff I don't upload here on the furrydiffusion discord but that's about it.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #53601
    87 143 1 E
    post #53655
    155 267 3 E

    Shanti

    Blocked

    "Hey guys, did you know that in terms of male human and female Pokémon breeding, Vaporeon is the most compatible Pokémon for humans?"

    If such "jokers" would not repeat the same "joke not of the first freshness", few people would know about it.
    Therefore, such questions are as meaningless as possible. They are on the same shelf, with the joke "to poke a man's face in the pie

    I don't want to offend anyone, but repeating the same thing is not good.

  • |
  • -8
    •
    post #53549
    231 364 2 E
    post #53469
    79 153 2 E
    post #8390
    36 55 1 Q
    post #53499
    76 112 5 E

    shark enthusiast

    Member

    caserus said:
    Not into insects in general, but every once in a while one comes along and isn't nightmare fuel. Usually it's the bees that turn out really cute.

    In all fairness I left out some of the more traditional insect prompts making these more anthro/furry than insect, not a big fan of the more accurate insect stuff myself.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #52962
    231 388 3 E

    UnkindledFlames

    Member

    slops said:
    How many legs does that guy have again?

    4 legged friend, but you can only see 3.
    From the left, is the back rear leg, front left leg, front right leg

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #53618
    55 87 1 E
    post #53562
    112 143 4 E
    post #53614
    97 132 3 E
    post #53575
    64 118 1 E
    post #53568
    169 271 4 E
    post #53644
    53 77 1 Q
    post #53152
    119 185 5 E
    post #53474
    63 86 2 E
    post #53639
    77 99 1 E
    post #53327
    56 95 2 E

    BirdLover

    Member

    dra-suzumebachi said:
    technically this should be tagged crossgender since only male peacocks have those vibrant colors and eye patterns on their tail feathers

    Ha, you're right. I'm fine with it, so if people agree, feel free to tag it as such :)

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #53621
    57 75 2 E

    BirdLover

    Member

    mikubraver said:
    What about nimbats?

    Hmm. I'll try. Early results don't look good unfortunately. Prompting for a nimbat gives me rabbits instead. I'll try a few more checkpoints and hope for the best

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #52723
    130 162 8 E
    post #53446
    44 56 2 E

    BirdLover

    Member

    Stunning!

    Great lighting and oh my god, that face, those eyes and that tail. Just pure perfection!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #53615
    37 48 2 Q
    post #53625
    97 113 5 E
    post #53625
    97 113 5 E
    post #53621
    57 75 2 E
    post #52374
    120 183 2 E
    post #53497
    242 409 3 E
    post #53568
    169 271 4 E
    post #53159
    117 191 3 E
    post #21200
    85 119 2 E
    post #53564
    125 175 4 Q

    user 20054

    Member

    feralbreeder said:
    Lovely image.
    Very good uniforms and background.
    "No intercourses" is killing me! LMAO

    I'm glad you like it! Actually the background wasn't generated, as I was unable to force the ai engine to make believable airplane corridor/toilet interior. I simply generated the characters separately, and the combined it with a real picture of a background, and then regenerated everything together so it blended somewhat nicely. It worked, but for whatever reason it became slightly blurry... gotta work on that some more.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #53564
    125 175 4 Q
    post #53242
    63 104 3 E
    post #53242
    63 104 3 E
    post #53531
    41 60 2 E
    post #53184
    37 53 1 E
    post #53344
    79 150 3 E
    post #53490
    141 232 1 E
    post #53527
    39 61 2 Q

    Technical-Grid

    Janitor

    slops said:
    Do we have tags for lora's that emulate specific artists style?

    No, the closest thing we have (that barely anyone uses anyway) are tags for models used for generation.
    I suppose you could round up similiar style images into a Set, but it's a hassle

  • |
  • 0
    •
    150 236 5 E
    post #53471
    63 83 4 S

    GoldAnthroWolf

    Member

    Awesome job! Still amazes me how the programs are so good at generating light sources, and highlights and shadows for a 2D picture, insanity I tell ya!

    purrfectlyai said:
    Thanks a lot :) I know people want more porn, but I simply like generating cuddly stuff.

    DITTO, if I can stop being lazy and ADHD, I need to start uploading some of the stuff I've done as well.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #53479
    37 30 2 S

    GoldAnthroWolf

    Member

    Awesome job! As I tell people, as much as I'm a pr0n conniseuir, I still like normal SFW arts as well! I have like 2000 pictures I generated for my own character, so, yeah both are still awesome!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #53349
    57 93 1 E
    post #24868
    32 32 1 S
    post #53471
    63 83 4 S
    post #52150
    31 29 1 S

    Ace The Batdog 1701

    Member

    I don't usually like this type of "pussy", but I'm going to go ahead and upvote due to the unique color, and the hints at Star Trek

  • |
  • 0
    •
    140 203 3 E
    post #53531
    41 60 2 E
    post #53527
    39 61 2 Q
    post #34776
    91 109 1 E
    post #33541
    19 30 1 E
    post #21129
    76 118 1 E

    Kishin

    Member

    You think you could make them kiss? :P
    French kissing lesbian are underrated :3

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #50492
    34 45 6 E
    post #53485
    123 173 3 E

    Fenix AI

    Member

    the_archivist said:
    I prefer style from your previous Jessie gen but this is still good <3

    Yea, mostly experimental, just wanted to see how close to the original artwork I could get

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #53469
    79 153 2 E
    22 34 5 E
    post #51835
    136 214 5 Q

    Tallblond606

    Member

    This is the perfect blend of anthropomorphism and realism, I feel like I could reach out and touch her.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #53485
    123 173 3 E
    post #48712
    85 124 6 E
    post #53484
    40 40 2 S
    post #48712
    85 124 6 E
    post #53499
    76 112 5 E

    caserus

    Member

    xerowolf said:
    Generally not into anthro Bees but I like this one

    Not into insects in general, but every once in a while one comes along and isn't nightmare fuel. Usually it's the bees that turn out really cute.

  • |
  • 1
    •