Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #14557
    24 35 1 E
    post #14560
    75 128 2 E

    Nocheamante

    Member

    Very beautiful, IMHO this is the perfect mix of human/canid. Add the claws and digitigrade feet and there is perfection.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #13509
    55 102 1 E
    post #15142
    164 319 1 E
    post #15150
    158 258 1 E
    post #10190
    48 70 3 E

    FreeSillyString

    Member

    moglo said:
    have promp this?

    I usually save prompts for things I generate when starting with txt2img. I generated this starting from another image in img2img so unfortunately I don't have the prompt saved. I would post if I had it (I've got prompts for most of my other uploads)

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #15201
    4 9 1 E
    post #14981
    6 18 3 E

    KifuUsaki

    Member

    Indeed. Love this, "series", I guess you could call it. I have a folder dedicated for these beach/wedding/gathering settings from this director. But this one image doesn't meet the normal standards I've come to expect.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #15139
    114 219 1 E
    post #15070
    579 1.0k 5 E

    Stufferman

    Member

    So does the owl only come out when the sex is happening or done? I notice she wasn't there in the first version, starting to think it is more voyeur owl than judgemental owl :)

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #14981
    6 18 3 E

    Waraen

    Member

    celeste_shamrock said:
    Several directing errors here. Foreground character anatomy clipping and positioning errors. Multiple errors on background characters, mostly hands and leg issues. Tan foreground female character missing lower jaw. Foreground red-brown female character multiple ears, face/jaw/mouth errors, multiple legs. Furthest background character severely deformed and incomplete.

    I kinda wonder about the quality control.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #4876
    251 425 1 E
    post #15151
    177 290 1 E
    post #15123
    66 96 1 Q
    post #15074
    9 34 2 S

    BlackGum

    Member

    leonoser said:
    Fishnet stuff is often tricky, but it turned out great here!

    Painfully aware, but thank you. I tend to get better luck with the word 'mesh'.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #15126
    25 59 3 Q
    post #15100
    65 119 2 E
    post #15108
    21 59 8 E
    post #15122
    62 100 2 E
    post #15108
    21 59 8 E
    post #15103
    12 12 3 E
    post #15103
    12 12 3 E
    post #15074
    9 34 2 S
    post #15079
    13 51 1 S
    post #14978
    55 76 2 Q

    Kio Redpaw

    Member

    It's more than letting a young cub see her private place, he's gets to give grooming licks there too.

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #15093
    56 81 1 E
    post #14940
    761 1.3k 5 E
    post #15041
    101 207 3 E

    AnonTk

    Member

    blackgum said:
    Looks great, what was used to generate this one?

    Here's the prompt:

    <lora:kathrin-vaughan-v1-fluffyrock:1.0>, kathrin-vaughan, (best quality, masterpiece:1), solo, furry female anthro, fur texture, (nude, consentacles, vaginal penetration, anal penetration, double penetration, oral penetration, tentacle grab, tentacle in mouth, tentacle in pussy, tentacle in ass, tentacle around breast, tentacle around leg, tentacle penetration, tentacle sex, arms above head, all three filled), (oral penetration, thick tentacles, until they like it, ahegao, orgasm face, eyes rolled back, fucked silly, multiple insertions, mulitple penetration, restrained, twitching, suspended via penetration), (bodily fluids, cum, cum in pussy, anal juice, cum in mouth), blushing, fingers, finger claws, teal eyes, medium hair, large breasts, wolf tail, (outdoors, forest), upper body shot, by zackary911, by fluff-kevlar, by wizzikt, by ruaidri, by braeburned, by dacad, by zaush

Negative prompt: worst quality, low quality, monochrome, conjoined fingers, deformed fingers, (bad-hands-5), all the way through
  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #15029
    43 68 4 E

    FeralBreeder

    Member

    What I like of the other version is the presence of jewels and the larger areolas of one of the mares, but definitely prefer this version.
    Thanks for sharing.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #15008
    13 18 7 E
    post #15041
    101 207 3 E
    post #12759
    36 65 1 Q
    post #14941
    109 161 5 E

    ForbiddenTome

    Member

    liquidscales said:
    The model I was experimenting with (YiffyMix) doesn't quite have the data for wyvern-like poses and mammals, and found arms up and arms out to have the most success for bats. Completely removing arms by adding similar descriptors to negative prompts also did the trick for some poses like this one.

    As expected, I used inpainting and rebaked just the wings a couple dozen times to get a pair that looked decent at the current resolution.

    That's very useful, thanks. I've also had issues with bat wings.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #15029
    43 68 4 E
    post #15008
    13 18 7 E

    GoldAnthroWolf

    Member

    Of all the things I thought I'd never seen porn of, of course, someone does it up cause of AI. What a time to be alive!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    109 171 1 E
    post #7780
    59 88 2 E
    post #14940
    761 1.3k 5 E
    post #14910
    62 101 1 E
    post #15008
    13 18 7 E
    post #15008
    13 18 7 E
    post #14981
    6 18 3 E

    celeste Shamrock

    Member

    Several directing errors here. Foreground character anatomy clipping and positioning errors. Multiple errors on background characters, mostly hands and leg issues. Tan foreground female character missing lower jaw. Foreground red-brown female character multiple ears, face/jaw/mouth errors, multiple legs. Furthest background character severely deformed and incomplete.

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #14667
    94 183 2 E

    FeralBreeder

    Member

    That's absolutely amazing!
    I'm so glad you moved to female characters too, cause I have always admired the quality of your images, but I'm not attracted by males.
    I would love to see a version with an anatomically correct vagina, if possible.
    Thanks for sharing!

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #14834
    132 246 1 E
    post #14835
    125 244 1 E
    post #14938
    95 178 2 E
    post #14941
    109 161 5 E
    109 191 2 E

    FeralBreeder

    Member

    It would be an amazing image if the vagina wouldn't be so unrealistically sized, but that's just my opinion...
    I think her muzzle is amazingly realistic, and I really like her detailed fur too.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #14985
    83 184 1 E

    FeralBreeder

    Member

    I absolutely love both her face and her position, and I really like the pawpads.
    I appreciate the background, I think it is detailed enough.
    Thanks for sharing.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #14941
    109 161 5 E

    LiquidScales

    Member

    terraraptor said:
    Rare species, nice. I wonder how long this took, because I've tried bats before and they take awhile 'cause of AI really struggling with the wings.

    The model I was experimenting with (YiffyMix) doesn't quite have the data for wyvern-like poses and mammals, and found arms up and arms out to have the most success for bats. Completely removing arms by adding similar descriptors to negative prompts also did the trick for some poses like this one.

    As expected, I used inpainting and rebaked just the wings a couple dozen times to get a pair that looked decent at the current resolution.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #14461
    46 101 2 E
    post #14941
    109 161 5 E
    post #14940
    761 1.3k 5 E

    TerraRaptor

    Privileged

    oo123 said:
    to many choices!

    Nono, i'm not struggling to decide which one to fuck, i'm trying to decide which ongoing rat joke to go for. Do i go for the R.O.U.S? Do I make a skaven reference? Maybe a bit of Jerma?

    One vote for Skaven, please.

  • |
  • 8
    •
    post #14941
    109 161 5 E

    TerraRaptor

    Privileged

    Rare species, nice. I wonder how long this took, because I've tried bats before and they take awhile 'cause of AI really struggling with the wings.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #13702
    18 29 1 E
    95 163 2 E

    badwolf1

    Member

    Not anatomically correct, balls are not placed correctly.
    Between the rear legs, not that.

  • |
  • -7
    •
    109 191 2 E
    post #14940
    761 1.3k 5 E

    Oo123

    Member

    to many choices!

    Nono, i'm not struggling to decide which one to fuck, i'm trying to decide which ongoing rat joke to go for. Do i go for the R.O.U.S? Do I make a skaven reference? Maybe a bit of Jerma?

  • |
  • 6
    •
    post #14938
    95 178 2 E
    post #14937
    32 34 1 S
    95 163 2 E
    post #14935
    30 70 1 E
    125 244 1 E
    post #14859
    19 50 1 Q
    post #14903
    16 14 1 S
    post #14660
    46 80 5 Q

    Nexor

    Member

    I can understand the concerns and should the artist have a problem with the image I would remove it without hesitation ,I see it as a tribute to his character

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #14898
    54 80 1 E
    post #14660
    46 80 5 Q

    AkelaWolfViolet

    Member

    kiyoka said:
    While it's awesome I am not sure I'd advise making OCs of others without permission because they might want to raise a stink on the site about copyrighted content and could use it as an excuse. I know, unpopular opinion and all but you usually want to be on the safe side cause the artist might claim you used their art to train the LORA used. :(

    concuerdo, pero igual rico

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #14890
    4 9 1 E
    post #14064
    82 157 1 E
    post #14691
    95 158 1 E
    post #14829
    22 33 1 E
    post #13956
    1 25 1 E