Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #41345
    26 37 2 E
    post #42100
    104 137 2 E
    post #15652
    125 227 2 E
    post #41258
    74 107 7 E

    Nocheamante

    Member

    docjoc222 said:
    i always wondered what popularized this type of pussy on this creature?

    The fact that the clitoral hood is prehensile like a puzzy tentacle that can grab a male member and do wild things makes furry fantasy go wild. I'd have to admit, that would be such a wild ride.

    Fun fact: Trancy Mik, states General Rain Silves is a full mutant among her species. Mutations include the clitoral hood, her height, she's bulkier, has heightened aggression, golden eyes, and hypersexuality. She's CONSIDERABLY larger than other sergals in every way making her valuable in battle. Rain's forked tongue was also not natural. Most sergals have a regular human-like slit, are generally in the range of human height, don't have gold eyes, and a pointed but non forked tongue (like a bird's).

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #14272
    78 146 2 E

    tangle

    Member

    day1vog said:
    We need more Trrith art. At the risk of sounding like a total degenerate, her hairy armpits, saggy balls, and embarrassed glowering expression are always like no other. I’d drop anything anytime to do whatever she wanted, no questions asked.

    I agree. She is delicious.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #42224
    104 173 3 E

    Monkeyrama

    Member

    One hand behind the back with a rope around the wrist and the other one free?
    Makes not much sense...

  • |
  • -3
    •
    post #41675
    155 247 3 E
    post #42060
    69 92 1 E
    post #42241
    83 109 2 Q
    post #42288
    188 324 6 E
    post #40341
    162 291 1 E
    post #42207
    81 149 2 E
    post #42234
    15 15 2 S
    post #42246
    133 190 3 Q
    post #41938
    178 347 1 E
    post #42241
    83 109 2 Q
    post #42246
    133 190 3 Q
    post #42234
    15 15 2 S
    post #42074
    67 107 4 E

    quicklime

    Member

    fluffscaler said:
    I would imagine you basically had to do each individually right? I think it's worth it. Also correct opinion on the cookie question.

    Yeah, each image was generated individually and pasted together at the end. Genning 5 images really isn't a big deal though, the real problems were other stuff, for one consistency. Mostly getting consistent clothing. Getting the right outfit basically added another variable to the gacha and another thing to fix in inpaint. It also started to refuse to gen any decent shirts at stage 4, so I just cut it at that point.
    And another really annoying though kinda minor thing was that the artstyle changed slightly. Between 3 and 4, as I removed the human tags, the style became way more flat with stronger lineart. I inpainted it to add more shine and stuff again, but it's still noticable to me.

    Also EasyFluff just kinda sucks at vaporeons. Pretty much every gen either had fucked up tail fins, more than three ear frills or multiples of the weird blue back frill twisting around the tail. Which is actually still the case in the 3rd picture.
    And another thing, which was my fault, was that I used hioshiru as an artist tag, which made the vaporeon fluffy. I had to inpaint all the tufts away. Vaporeon should be slick and smooth!

    Overall I still think it's quite good though. Probably the best AI TF thing I have seen yet, which was kinda my goal.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #42207
    81 149 2 E
    post #42074
    67 107 4 E

    Fluffscaler

    Member

    1001001001aa said:
    Good luck convincing anyone to make some though. This one took ages to make and was really annoying. Consistency is something AI really struggles with. I really tried to up the ante for AI TF stuff with this one, and it still has quite a few problems in my opinion.

    I would imagine you basically had to do each individually right? I think it's worth it. Also correct opinion on the cookie question.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    57 2 1 E

    Vextrius

    Member

    Sensors like this on a site like this is wild, pls dont force ppl to go through a paywall just for an ai generated image no matter how touched up it is

  • |
  • 9
    •
    post #42223
    10 11 1 S
    post #42224
    104 173 3 E
    post #42074
    67 107 4 E

    quicklime

    Member

    somerandombasitin said:
    Nice work, we need more TF sequences here, plus Vaporeon is so cute

    Good luck convincing anyone to make some though. This one took ages to make and was really annoying. Consistency is something AI really struggles with. I really tried to up the ante for AI TF stuff with this one, and it still has quite a few problems in my opinion.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #42219
    130 207 1 E
    post #40671
    35 32 2 Q
    post #41907
    39 46 4 E

    Marcus64

    Member

    aegishyena said:
    That's fair :) I'm being somewhat obnoxious anyway (the aforementioned squirrel-taur is a playable race in my D&D world, so). What do you mean by complicated... render time wise? Or just getting the prompts accurate since these things can be twitchy? I haven't found a good one that does four arms *and* taurs in the same attempt, which is why I ask.

    old pc, no money to replace it, like it takes me 8 min to generate an image or a recent pc does it in 8 sec, and when the result requires 40 tries like a certain orca, I'll let you imagine why I don't get involved in certain projects, otherwise for this type of thing the "simplest" thing is to do it in several stages, starting with a taur then modifying it by adding arms.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #42165
    14 17 1 E
    post #36576
    58 73 1 E
    post #37215
    79 117 1 E
    post #42185
    112 136 1 E
    post #42027
    71 90 3 E
    post #37773
    171 285 5 E
    post #42146
    166 292 1 E
    post #41484
    119 217 7 E
    post #42020
    184 267 3 E
    post #42035
    88 125 1 Q
    post #42122
    28 39 1 S

    Rayden

    Member

    @Wolfine
    Hey, you shouldn't attribute yourself other people generations, that's some very bad behavior, i was able to recognise that one and report it to the original Director, but i can't recognise the other one that you upload, which as this one has probably have been "stealed" by yourself.

    Please, either tag for unknow director or tag the right original director (which is not Wolfine) when you uploading other peoples content

    @Mondam, very nice picture as usual! Keep going on that great work;)

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #42118
    82 111 1 E

    Sniffeh

    Member

    I can't seem to make horse pictures this good for some reason. It keeps contorting the anatomy and making a penis come out of the vagina.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #42107
    86 124 1 E
    post #24603
    106 213 3 E
    post #35688
    175 293 3 E

    BirdLover

    Member

    Fantastic,

    I have no idea how you managed to pull off a feral Articuno. I've tried thousands of times, and I could not even get close to quality work like this. Well done!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #42099
    11 12 2 S
    post #42099
    11 12 2 S
    post #42112
    68 116 1 E

    DespairWorld

    Member

    "Due to a hacker leaking 1 uncensored image, post may slow down."
    thanks for helping him stay on schedule . xD

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #36470
    85 125 3 E
    post #41905
    252 418 4 E

    arthesis

    Member

    shallowloss said:
    Ferals in lingerie is just ALWAYS a pleasurable sight.
    Add that with a wedding context? Hoo boy.

    Yep, I'm right there with you

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #41862
    94 149 1 E
    post #40523
    111 190 2 E
    post #42020
    184 267 3 E
    post #41267
    75 130 2 E
    post #41307
    80 124 1 E
    post #39958
    101 161 5 E
    post #41391
    111 181 1 Q
    post #41396
    37 40 1 E
    post #41532
    165 240 1 E
    post #41886
    291 522 1 E
    post #41868
    80 137 1 E
    post #42058
    44 52 1 E

    kliefox

    Member

    Adding Jay Naylor's Zoe to the character ID, because of the hair, eye color, pink nose-tip, and athletic/slender build. I am aware her stripe pattern and bust size aren't quite a match, but close enough given the AI approximation.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #41763
    47 75 1 E
    post #41709
    148 222 2 E
    post #41978
    46 78 1 E
    post #42074
    67 107 4 E
    post #42069
    29 33 1 S

    Maxi22

    Member

    Ok wait…. The potential is insane… the realism is just………… wow

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #41709
    148 222 2 E
    post #41989
    54 85 1 E
    post #42027
    71 90 3 E
    post #40749
    68 96 1 E
    post #42020
    184 267 3 E
    post #42024
    17 26 1 Q
    post #41905
    252 418 4 E

    ShallowLoss

    Member

    Ferals in lingerie is just ALWAYS a pleasurable sight.
    Add that with a wedding context? Hoo boy.

  • |
  • 9
    •
    post #33138
    75 124 1 E
    post #28508
    268 505 2 E
    post #41907
    39 46 4 E

    AegisHyena

    Member

    marcus64 said:
    Given the resolution limit that I can provide (1000x1400p max) anything that is too large becomes complicated, just seeing how I had to make my giraffes for a satisfactory result, I will perhaps try in the future , but I don't promise anything.

    That's fair :) I'm being somewhat obnoxious anyway (the aforementioned squirrel-taur is a playable race in my D&D world, so). What do you mean by complicated... render time wise? Or just getting the prompts accurate since these things can be twitchy? I haven't found a good one that does four arms *and* taurs in the same attempt, which is why I ask.

  • |
  • 0
    •