Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #27914
    78 128 2 E
    post #29169
    131 203 2 E
    post #29220
    39 43 5 S

    Boreal Dancer

    Member

    parszuki said:
    Does it generate another effect, namely does it ring charmingly when the user moves? :)

    Of course, pretty much all the time in fact.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #29220
    39 43 5 S

    parszuki

    Member

    Does it generate another effect, namely does it ring charmingly when the user moves? :)

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #29198
    74 99 1 E
    post #29219
    69 76 5 E
    post #29274
    103 146 2 E
    post #29289
    49 87 3 E

    FrogFiller

    Member

    Are you still taking requests? I'd love to see a feral frog if you are! also, fantastic work so far!

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #29235
    42 68 1 E
    post #29219
    69 76 5 E
    post #29212
    57 64 5 S

    oldhroft

    Member

    haretrigger said:
    Spacebirb. Unfortunately this just shows us how difficult furries going to space would be. How's she gonna vacuum seal all that tail?

    Yep, that's a big question. Probably the easy way to explain it is some sci-fi energy shield that just makes a bubble around the user. But for classic and retrofuturism designs there is no choice but something like tightly attached and sealed tail-bag. It can probably be form fitting to have at least mediocre looks 🤔

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #12616
    15 41 4 E

    badwolf1

    Member

    Wonders things.
    Does food do in the rear or.. there?

    Doesn't really fit but this reminded me of the movie Chatterbox
    about a woman with a talking vag.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #29219
    69 76 5 E
    post #29120
    179 294 1 E
    post #28242
    51 90 2 E
    post #29194
    49 52 2 E

    parszuki

    Member

    Mlem... again? :)

    Mlem... regardless of the genre - as long as the character has hooves!

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #29153
    117 158 3 E

    blp

    Member

    giamidwi said:
    Sorry, yeah I didn't know how to tag that properly - when I uploaded it I put arfpep as the director but I don't think it worked

    no problem. i couldn't figure out how to do it when i joined either and someone fixed it for me. someone else added some tags and removed that one - i added it back and set the correct tag type.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #29212
    57 64 5 S

    HareTrigger

    Member

    Spacebirb. Unfortunately this just shows us how difficult furries going to space would be. How's she gonna vacuum seal all that tail?

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #29172
    100 118 1 E
    post #28664
    56 99 1 E
    post #29175
    36 50 1 E
    post #29253
    6 13 1 E
    post #27718
    93 130 3 E

    lichking127

    Member

    ilmpbx said:
    This was a quick turn I thought ended up pretty hot, I made several like it using the settings below. I wanted a sheep and otter but got fluffy otters instead XD.

    "Positive prompt: (perfect focus:1.1), 8k hd, photo, photorealistic, ultra realistic, hdr, bright lighting, realistic fur, sharp focus, BREAK male sheep mating press with female otter, fucking, mating press, vaginal penetration, saggy balls, close up, small realistic anus, realistic penis, realistic pussy, wet cock, rough sex, fluids flying,
    Negative prompt: easynegative, ng_deepnegative_v1_75t, boring_e621_v4, bwu, dfc, ubbp, updn, colored sclera, anime, painting ,cartoon, blurry, hole in nipples, more than one head, more than one pussy, more than one anus, puffy anus, deformed pussy, more than one face, more than 4 fingers on each hand, less than 4 fingers on each hand, watermark, too many balls,
    Steps: 50, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 19, Seed: 82813687, Size: 1024x1024, Model hash: b8b4c24fb6, Model: yiffymix_v41, TI hashes: "easynegative: c74b4e810b03, ng_deepnegative_v1_75t: 54e7e4826d53, boring_e621_v4: f9b806505bc2, ubbp: 047acf26d29c, updn: b4ae8ca1b247", Refiner: furRealify_v20 [ae85de05de], Refiner switch at: 0.89, Version: v1.7.0"

    Best things happen by accident XD thank you so much for sharing!! didn't know there is a fur refiner, that sounds interesting!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #3260
    41 74 2 Q
    post #3260
    41 74 2 Q
    post #29219
    69 76 5 E
    post #29221
    65 87 1 S
    post #12888
    23 43 3 S

    fftagger

    Member

    you used stable-diffusion-webui-pixelization from AUTOMATIC1111? or something else?

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #29229
    42 73 1 E
    post #29230
    35 57 1 E
    post #29219
    69 76 5 E
    38 0 6 S

    BEEPBEP

    Member

    omgechounknown said:
    Thank you! A Sangheili could be interesting. I'll look into it soon, but no promises!

    Of course, I appreciate you considering the idea at all!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #29096
    109 163 2 E
    post #29220
    39 43 5 S
    post #29220
    39 43 5 S
    post #29214
    45 77 2 E
    post #29097
    55 69 2 E
    post #29078
    105 166 6 E
    post #29153
    117 158 3 E

    giamidwi

    Member

    blp said:
    what's "arfpep", is that the director? if so i can fix the tag for you or you can go to tags, search it and just edit the type to Director.

    Sorry, yeah I didn't know how to tag that properly - when I uploaded it I put arfpep as the director but I don't think it worked

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #29212
    57 64 5 S

    oldhroft

    Member

    chastitycoyote said:
    Before or after shot of her "capture"?

    This is just a random, unrelated gen, but let's say it has happened before, for the sake of immersion.

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #29212
    57 64 5 S
    post #29054
    31 23 6 E

    blp

    Member

    ironhorse said:
    You say " you went with it " .... that's what I mean .. it's that difference that makes your work unique.

    thanks, i appreciate the compliment!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #29153
    117 158 3 E

    blp

    Member

    what's "arfpep", is that the director? if so i can fix the tag for you or you can go to tags, search it and just edit the type to Director.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #29155
    103 151 3 E
    post #29089
    76 143 2 E
    32 49 1 E
    post #29169
    131 203 2 E
    post #29155
    103 151 3 E
    post #29155
    103 151 3 E
    38 0 6 S

    OmgEchoUnknown

    Member

    beepbep said:
    Symmetrical armor, highly detailed face and scales, hands with the right number of fingers; damn, you really know how to make these models dance! Thank you for sharing with us!

    If you're still looking for a new subject and Loras fit into your workflow, I'd be extremely interested to see what you could do with a Sangheili lady!
    https://civitai.com/models/27483/sangheili-halo

    Thank you! A Sangheili could be interesting. I'll look into it soon, but no promises!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #29104
    29 32 2 Q
    post #29104
    29 32 2 Q
    post #29054
    31 23 6 E

    IRONHORSE

    Member

    blp said:
    thanks for the comment! honestly i can't take much credit for the imagination, i mostly just do two things: 1) use extreme parameters/modifications that make models do interesting stuff and 2) mainly just aim in a general direction and go with whatever looks good.

    so in this case, i didn't ask for the flower tail or anything but i went with it since i liked it even though it probably wasn't very close to what i prompted for. by the way if you do your own generating, you actually don't have to work too hard to get backrounds like this, just use a model that can do them (the v-pred models that are so popular don't really do this kind of soft painting/lineless style very well) and use tags like amazing background, detailed background and describe some general stuff you want like flowers sunset mountains background. i don't remember which model this was but probably indigo furry mix realistic (maybe hybrid), alphatango or redwater. those are all great for this kind of style.

    You say " you went with it " .... that's what I mean .. it's that difference that makes your work unique.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #29046
    80 99 2 E
    post #29054
    31 23 6 E

    blp

    Member

    ironhorse said:
    OK .. I like the tail .. nice touch. Your back rounds are detailed and beautiful. Great work.. wish I had your imagination. Thanks !

    thanks for the comment! honestly i can't take much credit for the imagination, i mostly just do two things: 1) use extreme parameters/modifications that make models do interesting stuff and 2) mainly just aim in a general direction and go with whatever looks good.

    so in this case, i didn't ask for the flower tail or anything but i went with it since i liked it even though it probably wasn't very close to what i prompted for. by the way if you do your own generating, you actually don't have to work too hard to get backrounds like this, just use a model that can do them (the v-pred models that are so popular don't really do this kind of soft painting/lineless style very well) and use tags like amazing background, detailed background and describe some general stuff you want like flowers sunset mountains background. i don't remember which model this was but probably indigo furry mix realistic (maybe hybrid), alphatango or redwater. those are all great for this kind of style.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #29048
    58 72 4 E

    blp

    Member

    badwolf1 said:
    Nice, balls are still not in the right location, they belong further forward. Between the rear legs and no skin connecting the anus and balls.

    it's hard to directly control that stuff and since a lot of furry art uses that positioning, models just do what they've seen before. it's not impossible to fix, of course but i'm not an inpaint minor details for hours until it's just right kind of person. i'm a rush ahead to experiment with the next fun thing kind of person.

    hopefully i'm reaching a level of quality that's still worth posting, but my stuff will probably never be super super polished for that reason.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #29113
    84 109 1 E
    post #22722
    117 209 5 E
    post #29106
    65 83 1 E
    post #29108
    44 54 1 Q

    Nocheamante

    Member

    Crotch boobs with chest breasts always look odd to me... but the guy in me still wants to touch.

  • |
  • 6
    •
    post #27994
    45 54 3 Q

    Nocheamante

    Member

    marcus64 said:
    I can assure you that it's not just the tails.

    Yeah I know, also tails, fingers, eyes (especially catlike/reptilian), arms, legs, claws, nails, close figures meld, and nagas are like hitting the lotto. I just made some pics and OMG it's a horror show at times. I made some BAGI picks... not enough of her around. I plan on resurrecting some OG hot furries but I need a much higher resolution source. Any ideas?

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #28588
    271 420 6 E
    post #27718
    93 130 3 E

    ilmpbx

    Member

    lichking127 said:
    Would you mind sharing what model/prompts etc you're using? Because the level of detail and the fur is crazy!

    This was a quick turn I thought ended up pretty hot, I made several like it using the settings below. I wanted a sheep and otter but got fluffy otters instead XD.

    "Positive prompt: (perfect focus:1.1), 8k hd, photo, photorealistic, ultra realistic, hdr, bright lighting, realistic fur, sharp focus, BREAK male sheep mating press with female otter, fucking, mating press, vaginal penetration, saggy balls, close up, small realistic anus, realistic penis, realistic pussy, wet cock, rough sex, fluids flying,
    Negative prompt: easynegative, ng_deepnegative_v1_75t, boring_e621_v4, bwu, dfc, ubbp, updn, colored sclera, anime, painting ,cartoon, blurry, hole in nipples, more than one head, more than one pussy, more than one anus, puffy anus, deformed pussy, more than one face, more than 4 fingers on each hand, less than 4 fingers on each hand, watermark, too many balls,
    Steps: 50, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 19, Seed: 82813687, Size: 1024x1024, Model hash: b8b4c24fb6, Model: yiffymix_v41, TI hashes: "easynegative: c74b4e810b03, ng_deepnegative_v1_75t: 54e7e4826d53, boring_e621_v4: f9b806505bc2, ubbp: 047acf26d29c, updn: b4ae8ca1b247", Refiner: furRealify_v20 [ae85de05de], Refiner switch at: 0.89, Version: v1.7.0"

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #29089
    76 143 2 E
    post #28513
    115 149 2 E

    ilmpbx

    Member

    chupadorpro said:
    Amazing details, what AI was used to generate this art?

    Generated with Stable Diffusion. With this Model: yiffymix_v41 and this Refiner: furRealify_v20 [ae85de05de], Refiner switch at: 0.85

    Took several iterations and several inpainting steps to get right.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #16314
    167 286 2 E
    post #19812
    136 187 4 E
    post #29102
    40 56 1 E
    post #29054
    31 23 6 E

    IRONHORSE

    Member

    OK .. I like the tail .. nice touch. Your back rounds are detailed and beautiful. Great work.. wish I had your imagination. Thanks !

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #28108
    44 73 4 E

    RedactedPaws

    Member

    cybercraft said:
    I have the hardest time seeing all the details if they are all dark....and nit-picking aside the picture was a pleasant surprise when the ai turned it out. i just wish I had the know how to fix the mistakes myself.

    I'm right there with ya on that last one. Haven't quite figured out the in-painting stuff yet. Just kinda cherry picking the best results from batches of mostly failures.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #24194
    73 186 6 E

    RedactedPaws

    Member

    nightdancer said:
    Thank you very much!
    I love her as well. =3

    Any chance we'll get to see more of her? Hopefully she hasn't met an untimely end here. Would be such a waste of a perfectly good bunbun 👀

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #29097
    55 69 2 E
    post #27298
    116 175 1 E
    post #29046
    80 99 2 E