Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #104672
    408 581 11 E
    post #104531
    74 121 2 Q
    post #104563
    104 163 5 E

    shanti said:
    A cat with a dog's pussy ... Okay. 😕

    Of all the possibilities in conceptual space that both actually exist and don't, THAT is what stands out to you? ... word? 😮‍💨☠️

  • |
  • 3
  • post #104665
    219 303 8 S
    post #103024
    423 547 18 S
    47 79 3 E

    ashgothorns said:
    Really love to see people experimenting with some new art styles on the site, and this one looks really good so far.

    If you don't mind, may I know what models are you using to achieve the style?
    I've tried in the past using fluffyrock, but never got it to generate "drawings"/"sketches" consistently.

    Thanks! I use Novel AI, with a mix of sketching for img2img, various Vibe Transfers, in-painting, and manual touch-ups. You can see some of the process here!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #104600
    333 614 6 E

    To add my 2 cents to the discussion:

    First of all even if I end up frustrated at times I don't hold any animosity/grudge toward the moderation.
    They must have a massive amount of images to moderate at any given time so they need to have rules and to sometimes make difficult decisions.

    I agree with you StableXai the second one is far superior to the first one and I could have fixed everything before uploading.

    But my issue resides more in what raiinbow dash is saying, my perception of what is "good enough" to upload here.
    It might be the consistency of the moderation (in the recent top posts I found a few images that, I feel, were not held to the same standard as mine, but honestly not as much as I thought I'd find)
    Or I could just be out of touch with the current rules.

    In the end, the result is the same for me.
    If I feel that I'm done/satisfied with an image that ended up removed, I'll move on to something else.
    Going back to edit and re-upload an image is time consuming and sometimes not worth it to me.
    (especially since e6 upload process requires more attentions than the other platform that I use)

    For this image I was on the fence, my first goal was just to include everyone to the poll.
    But since this style is winning, the image will be used as the first of the serie, so making it nicer makes sense.

    (also now I know that in my uploads the paw/hand/foot in the foreground needs defined features, otherwise I'm better off hidding as many as possible like in a lot of the top posts)

  • |
  • 4
  • post #104646
    79 113 7 E
    post #103906
    223 360 3 E
    post #104620
    37 54 1 E
    post #104642
    328 521 5 E

    Woah.. uh.. yeah! That's nice! That's a nice spade! And like NotThatClassic, that face, that's so great!

  • |
  • 4
  • post #104646
    79 113 7 E
    post #104657
    161 207 3 S
    post #104665
    219 303 8 S
    post #104672
    408 581 11 E
    post #104673
    110 157 2 Q
    post #104510
    50 54 2 S
    post #104580
    448 754 15 E

    Kinda got flash banged by the first frame. If you want the full res starting image I probably still have it.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #104661
    46 39 14 Q
    post #104500
    285 515 1 E
    post #104574
    120 187 3 E
    post #104575
    148 252 2 E
    post #104583
    114 190 3 Q
    post #104593
    370 641 4 E
    post #104659
    159 260 7 E
    post #104659
    159 260 7 E
    post #104661
    46 39 14 Q
    post #91244
    194 338 3 E

    darkykunn said:
    So should it be used when there's more than one?

    If the focus is on one character, then yes, but there are also other characters or parts of them in the frame.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #104562
    161 222 4 E

    ponyanonimniy said:
    This is second pic after first was deleted. Where i can find first? Do you have any accounts on other sites?

    Hehe, I'm currently trying out e6ai to share some of my huge stash of AI stuff (previously just some things on the furry discord). Its a bit of a learning to find out what gets rejected for what reasons.... so I'll upload bit by bit :)
    Maybe i'll do some toe or whatever correction on the different red dragon later :)

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #41921
    41 54 4 S
    post #104643
    114 176 3 E
    post #104580
    448 754 15 E
    post #104665
    219 303 8 S
    post #38034
    92 135 3 E
    post #75079
    88 127 1 E
    post #104199
    515 936 12 E
    post #104637
    130 197 2 S

    syntheticvixen said:
    All that time spent chasing tennis balls around the park really paid off!

    Seriously, she is a total cutie, and she looks amazing! Love the rather shyly proud smile on her face, and the outfit looks lovely on her. Those lil floppy ears are so darn cute, too!

    Thank you! I've never had a furry OC before, so I'm glad people actually like her

  • |
  • 1
  • post #104661
    46 39 14 Q
    post #104661
    46 39 14 Q
    post #104613
    139 241 2 E
    post #104572
    159 251 2 E
    post #104580
    448 754 15 E

    veld said:
    Huff, this is gorgeous from start to finish. The hints of visible tongue all the way through is what sells it for me.

    Glad I'm not the only one who loves seeing that in these animations

  • |
  • 4
  • post #104452
    129 243 4 E
    post #104499
    87 150 6 E
    post #104580
    448 754 15 E
    post #104419
    183 279 2 E
    post #103608
    136 211 4 E
    post #104448
    39 52 2 S
    post #104657
    161 207 3 S
    post #103974
    84 145 1 E
    post #104499
    87 150 6 E
    post #103536
    115 179 1 Q

    Beautiful image but something about the placement of her tail on the rear doesn't seem quite right...

  • |
  • -1
  • post #104450
    80 106 1 Q
    post #104501
    644 1.2k 5 E
    post #104510
    50 54 2 S
    post #104544
    153 327 1 E
    post #104642
    328 521 5 E
    post #104583
    114 190 3 Q
    post #104642
    328 521 5 E
    1 1 2 S

    Chunky bees are such a delight

    Edit: NOOO MY CHUNKY BEE I'VE BEEN ROBBED OF HAPPINESS

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #104646
    79 113 7 E

    It's rare to have such a high-resolution photo of a super-assive black hole; absolutely marvelous to behold. Nature is so beautiful.

  • |
  • 10
  • post #104646
    79 113 7 E
    post #95230
    107 170 7 E
    post #104643
    114 176 3 E
    post #104637
    130 197 2 S

    All that time spent chasing tennis balls around the park really paid off!

    Seriously, she is a total cutie, and she looks amazing! Love the rather shyly proud smile on her face, and the outfit looks lovely on her. Those lil floppy ears are so darn cute, too!

  • |
  • 2
  • post #104635
    178 276 2 S

    Aw, now isn't she a cutie? She's such a pretty vixen, and I love those big, fluffy tails of hers and that adorably eager pose. Such a good girl deserves all the head pats. And ear scritchies, too!

  • |
  • 4
  • post #23845
    9 27 4 E
    post #104612
    74 123 3 Q
    post #104635
    178 276 2 S
    post #104501
    644 1.2k 5 E
    post #104600
    333 614 6 E

    stablexai said:
    You could say it is art style for the front paws agreed - but not for the hind paw imo. Those are no claws, but an AI unrecognisable thing? Not trying to be offensive, it is a great picture even not fixed, but I can see why they removed it. Just compare it with the original on twitter. We have so good and powerful tools to fix things quick and comfortable. I understand why they do it. Even when it's a bit annoying. Much love.

    I think we're on the same page, just different opinions on what looks natural I guess. Even still, my main argument is for consistency, which seems to be lacking.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #104588
    106 148 5 E
    post #104628
    86 157 2 E
    post #104600
    333 614 6 E

    raiinbow_dash said:
    I actually do agree that the claws look better, but you could easily argue that the previous claws were stylized rather than incorrect. Just because one looks better, doesn't mean the other wasn't good. By that logic, any picture of Vaporeon with blue-like-claws should also be removed, no? or any picture where the pupils are even slightly off (I'm going off the reasoning for the removal of the previous version - there was no reason stating anything about general image quality/resolution/etc.).

    You could say it is art style for the front paws agreed - but not for the hind paw imo. Those are no claws, but an AI unrecognisable thing? Not trying to be offensive, it is a great picture even not fixed, but I can see why they removed it. Just compare it with the original on twitter. We have so good and powerful tools to fix things quick and comfortable. I understand why they do it. Even when it's a bit annoying. Much love.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #104600
    333 614 6 E

    stablexai said:
    I compared both versions, and I have to say the new version is a lot better. I fav this one, but would not have faved the other.
    I can see that the moderation is sometimes a bit weird or appears unfair, it sometimes really is, but the claws on the lifted hinpaws are a reason for me to be happy you fixed them and now it's an amazing piece!
    Anything you fixed looks better now to be honest when I switch between both versions back and forward. Good job. Much love.

    I actually do agree that the claws look better, but you could easily argue that the previous claws were stylized rather than incorrect. Just because one looks better, doesn't mean the other wasn't good. By that logic, any picture of Vaporeon with blue-like-claws should also be removed, no? or any picture where the pupils are even slightly off (I'm going off the reasoning for the removal of the previous version - there was no reason stating anything about general image quality/resolution/etc.).

  • |
  • 1