Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #68686
    29 41 2 S
    post #68727
    90 160 2 E
    post #68734
    37 89 1 Q
    post #68666
    139 217 2 E
    post #68739
    22 28 1 E
    post #68733
    83 150 1 Q
    post #68717
    70 92 2 E
    post #68751
    15 18 3 S

    just a note: need to tag what you see, not what you prompted with. tags also should use an underscore rather than spaces. looking at viewer is three separate tags - looking, at and viewer which is probably not what you want.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #68741
    111 154 3 E
    post #68098
    227 381 5 Q
    post #68741
    111 154 3 E

    Ooft this is amazing work, thanks for sharing and looking forward to seeing more!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #61956
    74 88 1 E
    post #45308
    83 114 1 E
    post #60725
    7 6 1 S
    150 325 5 E
    post #64224
    75 102 1 Q
    post #68048
    120 190 1 E
    post #68698
    184 302 4 E
    post #68508
    104 181 2 E

    kabar308 said:
    Only flaw in this logic that I see is that now you have left a new dinosaur that was never supposed to exist in the timeline. Thus, you have altered the timeline even more.

    Maybe it's following the Novikov self-consistency principle. The current timeline always was one with a sudden extra dinosaur.

  • |
  • 2
  • 60 90 1 E
    post #68677
    128 210 1 E
    60 69 3 Q
    10 19 1 Q
    post #68633
    99 163 1 Q
    post #66666
    38 51 4 E
    post #68073
    52 65 1 E
    post #68098
    227 381 5 Q
    post #68208
    86 162 1 E
    post #67627
    397 646 7 E
    post #68326
    64 90 2 E
    post #68328
    168 261 1 Q
    post #68467
    62 84 3 Q
    post #68414
    93 152 3 E
    post #68615
    88 128 3 E
    post #68609
    76 135 2 E
    post #68627
    93 144 1 E
    post #68668
    65 117 2 E

    'macedmousy' - dude, your watermark is heinous, reel it in so we can see the good work you're doing (smaller & translucent)

  • |
  • 6
  • post #68023
    138 194 4 E
    post #68680
    32 13 2 E
    post #68640
    70 108 2 E
    post #67644
    88 114 5 E
    post #68668
    65 117 2 E
    post #68671
    186 267 4 E
    post #68680
    32 13 2 E
    post #68683
    17 26 1 S
    post #68686
    29 41 2 S
    post #68200
    77 118 1 E
    post #67940
    204 336 13 E
    post #68574
    106 136 4 E

    denatural said:
    What an absolute cutie, she looks much better now.

    Ty :D hoping to revisit some of my older ones and update them with superior versions among some of my unrelease stuff :D

  • |
  • 0
  • post #68623
    209 341 4 E
    post #68480
    104 186 5 Q
    post #68635
    98 161 1 Q
    post #68671
    186 267 4 E
    post #68568
    33 26 1 Q
    post #68574
    106 136 4 E
    post #68637
    118 173 2 E
    post #68571
    52 82 2 Q
    post #68578
    38 55 1 E
    post #68474
    57 97 1 E

    Interesting to see a feral render by an AI trained on a Strictly anthro artist. That being Chunie. It looks lovely.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #67983
    149 267 1 E

    This pretty lass has a particularly sweet expression. It's rare to see these turn out so relaxed and natural looking.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #68508
    104 181 2 E

    Only flaw in this logic that I see is that now you have left a new dinosaur that was never supposed to exist in the timeline. Thus, you have altered the timeline even more.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #68519
    166 275 2 E
    post #68661
    20 23 1 S
    post #68654
    51 68 1 E
    post #68586
    85 140 1 Q
    post #68640
    70 108 2 E
    post #68571
    52 82 2 Q
    post #68637
    118 173 2 E
    post #68434
    93 174 1 E

    sometimes i see a rly good AI video and i js think how much better it would be if it looped cleanly 😭

  • |
  • 5
  • post #68582
    65 129 1 E
    post #68623
    209 341 4 E

    They're all tempting in different ways. Like they all appeal to a certain taste individually.

  • |
  • 9
  • post #68564
    66 99 7 E
    post #10089
    47 94 2 E
    post #68577
    64 131 2 E