Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #68666
    139 214 2 E
    post #68739
    22 28 1 E
    post #68733
    83 148 1 Q
    post #68717
    70 93 2 E
    post #68751
    15 18 3 S

    just a note: need to tag what you see, not what you prompted with. tags also should use an underscore rather than spaces. looking at viewer is three separate tags - looking, at and viewer which is probably not what you want.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #68741
    111 155 3 E
    post #68098
    227 381 5 Q
    post #68741
    111 155 3 E

    Ooft this is amazing work, thanks for sharing and looking forward to seeing more!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #61956
    74 88 1 E
    post #45308
    83 114 1 E
    post #60725
    7 6 1 S
    150 325 5 E
    post #64224
    75 102 1 Q
    post #68048
    120 190 1 E
    post #68698
    183 302 4 E
    post #68508
    104 182 2 E

    kabar308 said:
    Only flaw in this logic that I see is that now you have left a new dinosaur that was never supposed to exist in the timeline. Thus, you have altered the timeline even more.

    Maybe it's following the Novikov self-consistency principle. The current timeline always was one with a sudden extra dinosaur.

  • |
  • 2
  • 60 91 1 E
    post #68677
    128 210 1 E
    60 69 3 Q
    10 19 1 Q
    post #68633
    99 165 1 Q
    post #66666
    38 51 4 E
    post #68073
    52 65 1 E
    post #68098
    227 381 5 Q
    post #68208
    86 162 1 E
    post #67627
    395 646 7 E
    post #68326
    64 90 2 E
    post #68328
    168 261 1 Q
    post #68467
    62 84 3 Q
    post #68414
    93 152 3 E
    post #68615
    88 128 3 E
    post #68609
    76 135 2 E
    post #68627
    93 144 1 E
    post #68668
    65 118 2 E

    'macedmousy' - dude, your watermark is heinous, reel it in so we can see the good work you're doing (smaller & translucent)

  • |
  • 6
  • post #68023
    138 194 4 E
    post #68680
    32 13 2 E
    post #68640
    70 108 2 E
    post #67644
    88 114 5 E
    post #68668
    65 118 2 E
    post #68671
    186 267 4 E
    post #68680
    32 13 2 E
    post #68683
    17 26 1 S
    post #68686
    29 41 2 S
    post #68200
    77 118 1 E
    post #67940
    204 336 13 E
    post #68574
    106 136 4 E

    denatural said:
    What an absolute cutie, she looks much better now.

    Ty :D hoping to revisit some of my older ones and update them with superior versions among some of my unrelease stuff :D

  • |
  • 0
  • post #68623
    209 341 4 E
    post #68480
    104 187 5 Q
    post #68635
    97 160 1 Q
    post #68671
    186 267 4 E
    post #68568
    33 26 1 Q
    post #68574
    106 136 4 E
    post #68637
    118 173 2 E
    post #68571
    52 81 2 Q
    post #68578
    38 55 1 E
    post #68474
    57 97 1 E

    Interesting to see a feral render by an AI trained on a Strictly anthro artist. That being Chunie. It looks lovely.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #67983
    148 267 1 E

    This pretty lass has a particularly sweet expression. It's rare to see these turn out so relaxed and natural looking.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #68508
    104 182 2 E

    Only flaw in this logic that I see is that now you have left a new dinosaur that was never supposed to exist in the timeline. Thus, you have altered the timeline even more.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #68519
    166 273 2 E
    post #68661
    20 23 1 S
    post #68654
    51 68 1 E
    post #68586
    85 140 1 Q
    post #68640
    70 108 2 E
    post #68571
    52 81 2 Q
    post #68637
    118 173 2 E
    post #68434
    93 174 1 E

    sometimes i see a rly good AI video and i js think how much better it would be if it looped cleanly 😭

  • |
  • 5
  • post #68582
    65 129 1 E
    post #68623
    209 341 4 E

    They're all tempting in different ways. Like they all appeal to a certain taste individually.

  • |
  • 9
  • post #68564
    66 99 7 E
    post #10089
    47 94 2 E
    post #68577
    64 131 2 E
    post #68480
    104 187 5 Q
    post #68453
    5 7 2 S

    majinbreed said:
    This should not be flagged for review
    Under mainsite and ai site rules Viera are perfectly acceptable to be here
    taken from the guidelines
    do not remove this piece.

    there is both a human ear and bunny "ears"
    this just looks like a human with a bunny ears headwear
    the ear rings makes this more apparent

  • |
  • 0
  • post #68421
    11 14 2 S