Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #68098
    228 384 5 Q
    post #68741
    114 158 3 E

    Ooft this is amazing work, thanks for sharing and looking forward to seeing more!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #61956
    74 87 1 E
    post #45308
    83 115 1 E
    post #60725
    7 6 1 S
    150 325 5 E
    post #64224
    76 102 1 Q
    post #68048
    121 191 1 E
    post #68698
    184 302 4 E
    post #68508
    106 182 2 E

    kabar308 said:
    Only flaw in this logic that I see is that now you have left a new dinosaur that was never supposed to exist in the timeline. Thus, you have altered the timeline even more.

    Maybe it's following the Novikov self-consistency principle. The current timeline always was one with a sudden extra dinosaur.

  • |
  • 2
  • 60 90 1 E
    post #68677
    128 209 1 E
    60 68 3 Q
    10 19 1 Q
    post #68633
    100 164 1 Q
    post #66666
    39 51 4 E
    post #68073
    53 66 1 E
    post #68098
    228 384 5 Q
    post #68208
    86 161 1 E
    post #67627
    399 646 7 E
    post #68326
    64 88 2 E
    post #68328
    168 263 1 Q
    post #68467
    62 84 3 Q
    post #68414
    94 152 3 E
    post #68615
    88 127 3 E
    post #68609
    76 134 2 E
    post #68627
    93 143 1 E
    post #68668
    65 116 2 E

    'macedmousy' - dude, your watermark is heinous, reel it in so we can see the good work you're doing (smaller & translucent)

  • |
  • 6
  • post #68023
    139 194 4 E
    post #68680
    32 13 2 E
    post #68640
    70 108 2 E
    post #67644
    88 114 5 E
    post #68668
    65 116 2 E
    post #68671
    187 267 4 E
    post #68680
    32 13 2 E
    post #68683
    17 25 1 S
    post #68686
    29 40 2 S
    post #68200
    77 117 1 E
    post #67940
    205 337 13 E
    post #68574
    109 136 4 E

    denatural said:
    What an absolute cutie, she looks much better now.

    Ty :D hoping to revisit some of my older ones and update them with superior versions among some of my unrelease stuff :D

  • |
  • 0
  • post #68623
    210 343 4 E
    post #68480
    105 186 5 Q
    post #68635
    99 161 1 Q
    post #68671
    187 267 4 E
    post #68568
    33 27 1 Q
    post #68574
    109 136 4 E
    post #68637
    121 173 2 E
    post #68571
    52 83 2 Q
    post #68578
    38 56 1 E
    post #68474
    58 99 1 E

    Interesting to see a feral render by an AI trained on a Strictly anthro artist. That being Chunie. It looks lovely.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #67983
    149 267 1 E

    This pretty lass has a particularly sweet expression. It's rare to see these turn out so relaxed and natural looking.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #68508
    106 182 2 E

    Only flaw in this logic that I see is that now you have left a new dinosaur that was never supposed to exist in the timeline. Thus, you have altered the timeline even more.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #68519
    166 277 2 E
    post #68661
    20 23 1 S
    post #68654
    51 68 1 E
    post #68586
    85 139 1 Q
    post #68640
    70 108 2 E
    post #68571
    52 83 2 Q
    post #68637
    121 173 2 E
    post #68434
    93 174 1 E

    sometimes i see a rly good AI video and i js think how much better it would be if it looped cleanly 😭

  • |
  • 5
  • post #68582
    66 132 1 E
    post #68623
    210 343 4 E

    They're all tempting in different ways. Like they all appeal to a certain taste individually.

  • |
  • 9
  • post #68564
    67 99 7 E
    post #10089
    47 94 2 E
    post #68577
    64 131 2 E
    post #68480
    105 186 5 Q
    post #68453
    5 7 2 S

    majinbreed said:
    This should not be flagged for review
    Under mainsite and ai site rules Viera are perfectly acceptable to be here
    taken from the guidelines
    do not remove this piece.

    there is both a human ear and bunny "ears"
    this just looks like a human with a bunny ears headwear
    the ear rings makes this more apparent

  • |
  • 0
  • post #68421
    12 14 2 S
    post #68524
    4 58 5 E
    post #68540
    130 222 2 E
    post #68524
    4 58 5 E

    djffr234 said:
    Could we all agree,that Pictures like this should be tagged with 'mid_transformation' or something? I think it would fit

    Or just "transformation" seems reasonable. I mean, most are going to be mid-transformation pics if "tag what you see" is respected.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #64233
    284 473 1 E
    post #67262
    23 58 1 E
    post #68533
    117 168 1 E
    post #68527
    105 167 1 E