Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #40592
    83 106 1 Q
    post #37571
    134 209 1 E
    post #21792
    91 128 2 E
    post #40523
    111 191 2 E
    post #40576
    62 104 3 E

    mechanic31 said:
    You may not like this one, but I have plans for a little break with this topic. For myself, I see several main topics (on fetishes), and after three consecutive publications on the topic of chastity, I'm thinking of posting some images with diapers. Thus, I plan to publish some kind of diverse content, and not be limited to just one series (both you and I will get tired of it pretty quickly).

    Completely understandable, I am sure it will be fine with whatever you do. Looking forward to it 8-)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #40576
    62 104 3 E

    chastitycoyote said:
    Loving this little series and thanks for sharing it 8-)

    You may not like this one, but I have plans for a little break with this topic. For myself, I see several main topics (on fetishes), and after three consecutive publications on the topic of chastity, I'm thinking of posting some images with diapers. Thus, I plan to publish some kind of diverse content, and not be limited to just one series (both you and I will get tired of it pretty quickly).

  • |
  • 1
  • post #40576
    62 104 3 E
    post #40531
    36 48 3 E
    post #40541
    40 44 1 E
    post #40496
    21 42 2 E
    post #39996
    196 352 2 E

    xenomorph-lv426 said:
    This Leafeon of yours is very beautiful, I love the fact that even though she feels a little embarrassed, she still makes an effort to try to seduce us. A little suggestion, if I may, of course? You could post another image exactly like this one, but with a very small and subtle detail, which would be: in the place where her juice is falling, which is this trunk, you could place a small and beautiful flower or mushroom emerging from her juice. , as if this were the result of its energy as a plant-type Pokemon, at least for me it's a really cool idea, besides it's a good reference to ''Shrek 2''!.

    That's a super cute idea. Originally I wanted to have the juices run down the log more clearly, but I had way too many inpaints where her juices instead turned into acid and split the entire log in half, which was fun, but didn't exactly fit the image. Chances are I'm gonna do another Leafeon at some point, she's my fav Eeveelution after all.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #40495
    231 346 6 E
    post #40450
    37 44 2 Q
    post #40495
    231 346 6 E
    post #40495
    231 346 6 E
    post #40319
    39 68 3 E

    mechanic31 said:
    Do you want more similar publications? I already have several images on the theme that are waiting to be uploaded.

    Yes, I do ^-^
    I don't know about other people, but I find ferals in chastity very hot. Especially equines <3

  • |
  • 2
  • post #34438
    118 190 4 E
    post #37773
    169 284 5 E
    post #19185
    55 73 5 Q

    sagefurry said:
    It's not worth calling animated, it's just puppet-warping between different angles in the feature-temporal space. It's done by creating a batch and then interpolating between the similar weights. It's temporally consistent here because the motion module is overfitted to this exact animation. The trouble with MM tensors is they're limited to small clips before running out of memory, they're like 3D bitmap proportions of heavy data processing.

    Animation has timing and flow to it. Just because it's moving like a jerry-rig doesn't mean it's animated, it looks like its dragging MPEG artifacts around in an over-compressed video. The motion aspect isn't really a part of the neural network either so you don't get actual control over the video logic at all.
    AI animation just doesn't exist yet. Or well it does actually but current AI anim is so low res it looks like a mess of noise that barely differs from the stock trained video. Read the Tune a Video paper, it's not generating any original movement but you can use ControlNet and TD to do vid2style pretty well now. I've not seen a single so-called AI video that had original movement, the most creative it can do is just add a bit of head/arm movement to an otherwise still image. Not seen any papers yet either. Besides it's better to generate mocap data and then rotoscope that with AI. 2D copy buffer AI isn't the future of AI anims, gaussians is. Seeing these puppet animations is cringe, it's not worth the GPU cycles at all. Even NFT AI videos from 3 years ago are 100x better than these head-turn-arm-wiggle anims. Just see LeiaPix and other crap if you want cheesy parallax effects.

    using puppets are actually an animation technic, unless you are thinking about animated filters on real actors

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #40520
    200 258 15 E

    ausfer said:
    Hey now, that text is cut-off for a reason! It could say anything! Like .... multiple organ evisceration.

    Definitely not something along the lines of 'excitability, multiple orgasms, euphoric and ...' 😆

  • |
  • 4
  • post #40534
    45 78 1 E
    post #40563
    38 94 1 E
    post #37737
    92 118 1 Q
    post #40520
    200 258 15 E

    avvviaria said:
    side effects include multiple orgasms? is that supposed to deter me 0_0

    Hey now, that text is cut-off for a reason! It could say anything! Like .... multiple organ evisceration.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #40520
    200 258 15 E
    post #38069
    75 152 2 E
    post #40480
    126 205 4 E
    post #40516
    68 107 1 E
    post #40521
    53 50 3 S
    post #40520
    200 258 15 E
    post #40486
    60 109 2 S
    post #40511
    135 229 2 E

    Can't blame her with cute protogens like that running around!
    Thanks for the collab c:

  • |
  • 2
  • post #40495
    231 346 6 E
    post #40512
    160 270 1 E
    237 363 2 E
    post #39996
    196 352 2 E

    This Leafeon of yours is very beautiful, I love the fact that even though she feels a little embarrassed, she still makes an effort to try to seduce us. A little suggestion, if I may, of course? You could post another image exactly like this one, but with a very small and subtle detail, which would be: in the place where her juice is falling, which is this trunk, you could place a small and beautiful flower or mushroom emerging from her juice. , as if this were the result of its energy as a plant-type Pokemon, at least for me it's a really cool idea, besides it's a good reference to ''Shrek 2''!.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #40495
    231 346 6 E
    post #40442
    269 492 5 E
    post #40031
    156 262 6 E

    redactedpaws said:
    Wait... How the hell did I miss that? xD

    It happens so easy...

    I did turn a lot of your tags when they got a name into character tags.
    Its not a hard process at all but many do not know they can do it.

    The first upload I did here was my created content, and I put my username in as the director, as it should have been, but it said something about restoring a tag... Im guessing the DB has a clone of the tag environment from e621, as my username there has actual "character" tags for my username as a character with some commissions and gifts with my OC. So its why now all my posts list my username as the character instead of director.

    I should fix it at some point.

    I really like the tag what you see aspect they implemented at e621 and extended here. Its not perfect, but its a far cry more useful than anything else regardless IMHO.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #40396
    80 127 1 E
    post #40473
    149 272 6 E
    post #36119
    97 148 4 E

    jackson_maxston said:
    The donut is nice, but that face pattern design is hot as hell. <3
    She looks dangerous, exotic, and GOTH AS F*CK!!!! I love it.

    She was really just a one-off generation. Wasn't really trying for anything specific. But, she is gorgeous.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #17207
    73 126 3 E
    post #40031
    156 262 6 E
    post #40317
    205 318 3 E
    post #40473
    149 272 6 E

    ausfer said:
    They are a creature I created using NovelAI Diffusion's Furry v3 model and the Vibe Check module (AKA image prompt adapter).

    I love them and their design.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #40360
    74 97 4 E

    redactedpaws said:
    Oh my god, look at those hind leg muscles! o.O
    The anatomy portrayed here is fucking beautiful.

    thanks! my anatomy isn't always the most amazing but like they say, even a blind cat (or coyote?) can catch a mouse from time to time.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #30431
    79 154 1 E
    post #40462
    50 84 1 E
    post #40485
    98 122 1 E
    post #40473
    149 272 6 E

    ripto said:
    Hell yeah, keep 'em coming! I don't know if these creatures are from a movie or something or if they're original stuff, but boy, do I love them!

    They are a creature I created using NovelAI Diffusion's Furry v3 model and the Vibe Check module (AKA image prompt adapter).

  • |
  • 0
  • post #40401
    127 180 2 E

    mercrantos said:
    My man's rubbing them titties like some kind of xbox controller

    The OG xbox controller tho. The clunky one that was too big for people's hands.

    Look at him using that dual analog stick action!

  • |
  • 2
  • post #40410
    168 252 4 E

    nocheamante said:
    This is a wonderfully beautiful character. Are you the same Ausfer from FA with the dragon stories?

    As an ausfer, I exist simultaneously in multiple realities, multiple planes of existence, and sometimes -- even multiple websites.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #40128
    14 31 2 Q

    hiroshifox said:
    Really like the diaper art you do. Great work on this piece. Look forward to seeing more of your work in the future.

    Thank you for the kind words, I have something to show you). Including, not only with ponies (but ponies are a priority for me).

  • |
  • 0
  • post #40282
    187 312 3 E
    post #40401
    127 180 2 E
    post #40128
    14 31 2 Q

    Really like the diaper art you do. Great work on this piece. Look forward to seeing more of your work in the future.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #40442
    269 492 5 E

    despairworld said:
    1) Was the background created first or outpainted to the sides?
    2) have you tried to use forge couple ?
    3) side characters , you used big denoise, or many times small denoise ?

    1: I genned all 3 chars with similar prompts and then just smushed them onto one canvas, every seam and most major background regions received inpaint passes to blend them together. If I did it again I would do the middle character, then outpaint the side regions, then drop the other 2 characters on top. Or if I can be bothered install the krita plugins, those seem the best for higher effort stuff. In hindsight this was super inefficient but I had fun doing it. (for point of reference: https://files.catbox.moe/d47mha.png)
    2: Forge couple as far as I saw was similar to the other regional prompters I've used, which always have trouble with loras, and I use like 5 here. I decided against it, back in SD1.5 I used regional prompting more frequently, but since I'm now inpainting a lot more, I kinda don't see the need, since it takes 10 seconds to inpaint even major characters in.
    3: The values I usually use are 96padding/0.55 denoise for detailing, 256padding/0.65 or 0.75 for major regions. I did use an image editor to paint in some specific things the AI was hard to wrangle on, like Vapys tail anus. I try to get the major regions done, then do a detailing pass over every limb. So for Jolteon it would be, 1 times over the legs and paws, once over the thighs and butt, upper body, and then the face. Since I kept adding more stuff I obviously did some regions again, at first Jolty wasn't spreading but I felt like it right before finishing.

    I did start finishing some guides, currently you can find an Inpainting and PDXL spoonfeed guide here, might help https://rentry.org/fluffscaler
    PDXL guide features prompt templates as well, this pic largely used what I named "2.5D Kemono mix"

  • |
  • 2
  • post #40160
    123 163 1 E
    post #40347
    136 209 1 E
    post #40410
    168 252 4 E

    This is a wonderfully beautiful character. Are you the same Ausfer from FA with the dragon stories?

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #40442
    269 492 5 E

    "Do NOT ask how long this took."
    exactly what I wanted to ask...but I will only say that it looks amazing :D.

    I just have a couple of technical questions.
    1) Was the background created first or outpainted to the sides?
    2) have you tried to use forge couple ?
    3) side characters , you used big denoise, or many times small denoise ?

  • |
  • 1
  • post #40473
    149 272 6 E

    Hell yeah, keep 'em coming! I don't know if these creatures are from a movie or something or if they're original stuff, but boy, do I love them!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #34844
    46 48 1 E

    i changed the tags on this back to ambiguous_gender from andromorph/intersex. andromorph would be a masculine body type: in this case it's ambiguous and on an anthro character leaning toward the feral side a female wouldn't necessarily have obvious human like breasts. i think ambiguous_gender is more accurate (was originally intended to be a female also).

  • |
  • 0
  • post #40360
    74 97 4 E
    post #40444
    160 277 2 E
    post #40379
    35 49 2 E
    post #39750
    60 76 2 Q

    celeste_shamrock said:
    Not a bad first effort, but her foot kind of makes no sense in its anatomy.

    Yep, I tried to fix it with hundreds of prompts, but no chance. Maybe in the future when i learn that inpainting magic ;)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #38272
    117 219 2 E
    post #9557
    217 302 3 E
    post #40348
    224 412 4 E
    post #40362
    135 222 1 Q
    post #40379
    35 49 2 E

    fixed a whole bunch of your tags for you.
    including your director tag
    please get better at tagging soon... for my sanity

  • |
  • 4
  • post #40437
    52 62 1 Q
    post #40389
    65 88 2 E