Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #98436
    193 349 4 E
    post #98457
    298 428 9 E

    She's working her way up to man dick. ;3

    Is it just me or did she get a bit bigger? xD

  • |
  • 2
  • post #98486
    192 364 1 E

    Finally someone who got horse dick right on a anthro as most of the time they don't scale it down from feral to the anthro build, so you end up having anthro's with dick half the size of their body.

  • |
  • 11
  • post #96487
    360 531 3 E
    post #97819
    3 23 4 E

    dragonsaurmon said:
    Because this I don't make females.

    Well, that’s the thing. A lot of people make the mistake of trying to generate scat art in a single shot. It’s understandable, when AI art has come to the point of generating hands and such properly on your first, second, or third try. But to a model, a hole is a hole, and insertion is insertion, especially when it has to generate a single frame.

    The key is to generate a base image without scat, and then use inpainting features to re-generate the parts of the image where scat would actually appear.
    Even with a fitting LoRA, you still get results like this sometimes.

  • |
  • 2
  • 46 42 3 S

    Yeah, I have to check multiple times daily and jump on them and DL them instantly, some have been my favorite pieces that have been deleted do to some ambiguous "doesn't meet the uploading guidelines."

  • |
  • 0
  • 20 16 7 S
    post #98485
    221 380 3 E
    post #98459
    240 409 8 Q

    farmerbearlovesmoos said:
    Where can I pick up this magazine???

    Ah, you’ll find it nestled between Cat Fancy and What Doggos Do in Their Secret Lives at your local newsstand. 🐾 Disclaimer: Magazine may or may not come with a free squeaky toy and a doggo autograph (paw print included).

  • |
  • 0
  • 75 112 4 E
    58 86 9 E

    kingk said:
    What is the issue with this one? I'm not trying to be a jerk, but I'm honestly confused.

    I just save everything I like locally these days. Mods are far too strict with applying the guidelines.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98405
    121 194 2 E
    75 112 4 E

    I also don't understand why it's marked for deletion.?? 🧐
    there are obviously just some people who are a pain in the ass... 😤
    just because she looks young doesn't mean she is young....

  • |
  • 8
  • post #98459
    240 409 8 Q

    nagiman90 said:
    This would be awesome, especially in themes, like Nurse Edition, Maid Edition, Lingerie Edition, Sex Toys, etc...

    The idea was to create different breeds, but I'll consider those options too. By the way, I have some free time today. Second cover soon?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98449
    431 783 6 E
    post #98385
    111 192 4 E
    55 79 5 E

    ashgothorns said:
    I thought so at first glance, took me a bit to realize the leftmost finger had 2 nails, one growing form below.

    Hm, maybe so. I guess there's something there. I kinda overlooked it as indescernible since it's a sketchy style. I guess maybe I'm more forgiving of AI works when it comes to less glaring anatomical issues, considering what it sometimes throws out there, especially with pieces that use uncommon art styles.

  • |
  • 2
  • 55 79 5 E

    kingk said:
    Okay seriously mods, is this all the same person? What's the issue now? He has glaucoma? He's trans? I thought abusing the flag system was bannable? I know I'm also not supposed to complain, but it really seems as though somebody just has a vendetta, or an unrealistic expectation of an AI site.

    I thought so at first glance, took me a bit to realize the leftmost finger had 2 nails, one growing form below.

  • |
  • 0
  • 55 79 5 E
    post #66628
    101 169 5 E
    75 112 4 E

    I honestly didn't see this as young, based on her proportions and the tilt towards a breast in the first panel. It's just a flat coloring style common to anime that makes a shaved puss look hairless.

    I guess you see what you want to see.

    Updated

  • |
  • 12
  • 58 86 9 E

    danzabowo said:
    They usually cite it in your profile when it's deleted. I'm not sure either, but I assume maybe the teeth? idk

    Yeah that's all I can think of, but I don't see where odd creatures are against the guidelines. I mean, call him a kelpie if it makes you feel better. How is that not okay, but charr and bugbears are?

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98479
    156 265 3 E

    She's beautiful, and that blush is sooo adorable! I just wanna scoop her up and never let go 🥰

  • |
  • 1
  • post #98465
    59 124 1 E
    post #98454
    111 171 5 E
    post #92833
    295 408 16 E

    anotherfurryfan4679 said:
    So I take it the batfolk from that one image are from a different region? So Volume 3 eventually?

    Thanks! Funny you ask - the bat was in this lineup during the WIP phase. I ended up removing her though, they're more suitable for another thematic volume. So yes, something for later.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98493
    181 335 9 E

    I didn't pay much attention to the story at first, but when I read that it was the first comic on this site, I reread it from the beginning and have to say, it's not bad.
    Now I'm really curious to see how the story continues.

  • |
  • 10
  • post #98489
    180 307 4 E
    46 42 3 S
    post #98459
    240 409 8 Q

    This would be awesome, especially in themes, like Nurse Edition, Maid Edition, Lingerie Edition, Sex Toys, etc...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #98454
    111 171 5 E

    Actually, Saint in a church ? That idea is just so obvious that nobody have ever done it lmao, and I love it !

  • |
  • 1
  • 64 91 3 E
    64 91 3 E
    post #96282
    149 268 2 E
    post #81891
    137 268 4 E
    post #10359
    87 180 1 E
    post #98371
    191 332 6 E

    furriestguninthewest said:
    Yeah they're getting a bit excessive with the quality requirements. There are so many where I just can not find what they could possibly be complaining about.

    I flagged one a couple weeks ago here, legs bent horribly wrong.
    It was left up, but oh god you have a sixth knuckle that can only be seen by enlarging and nitpicking.
    Getting to the bullshit level.
    What about the hundreds of old crap posts here they won't delete.

    Believe it, the other site suddenly claims to have standards, just fricking funny with thousands of absolute shitposts they won't dump.
    I think they are both owned by the same person(s) being set up identically.

  • |
  • 4
  • 55 79 5 E
    post #53017
    59 83 1 E
    post #98456
    242 383 5 E
    post #98406
    138 256 5 E
    post #98421
    214 384 3 E

    The dog anthro is perfect - just change the human with a furry and it's gold tier

  • |
  • -10
  • 20 16 7 S
    46 42 3 S
    post #98143
    108 164 6 E
    post #98424
    120 134 1 S
    post #94939
    58 64 5 S

    Holy moly, she is a cutie-patooty even when she is angy.

    Great gen and thanks for sharing.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #66801
    169 308 1 E
    post #98371
    191 332 6 E

    ironhorse said:
    I liked the other post also ... the take downs are getting ridiculous ,, and they don't allow AI on e621 .. I thought the whole point of this site was to post art.

    Yeah they're getting a bit excessive with the quality requirements. There are so many where I just can not find what they could possibly be complaining about.

  • |
  • 2
  • 20 2 3 E
    post #66628
    101 169 5 E
    post #78755
    20 23 1 S
    post #92376
    305 484 3 E
    41 73 3 E
    post #98451
    72 79 3 S
    post #3
    124 122 45 S
    post #97427
    62 87 3 S
    post #98177
    116 204 16 Q

    feluniferal said:
    I made another post with the same character without the growth but I think I'm just gonna try to remake this one without the growth so it's just her walking.

    Honestly, I'd say just ignore the haters and keep doing whatever you're doing. It looks good for AI, too.

  • |
  • 5
  • 37 33 1 S
    post #98449
    431 783 6 E
    post #98371
    191 332 6 E

    I liked the other post also ... the take downs are getting ridiculous ,, and they don't allow AI on e621 .. I thought the whole point of this site was to post art.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #98456
    242 383 5 E
    post #98457
    298 428 9 E
    post #98459
    240 409 8 Q
    post #98431
    37 34 3 E
    21 30 1 E
    post #98451
    72 79 3 S
    post #98454
    111 171 5 E
    post #98458
    258 470 3 E
    post #98436
    193 349 4 E
    post #97756
    326 556 3 E
    post #98256
    163 263 1 E
    post #96902
    186 289 3 E
    post #94681
    154 250 4 Q
    post #98459
    240 409 8 Q