Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #98405
    120 195 2 E
    75 112 4 E

    I also don't understand why it's marked for deletion.?? 🧐
    there are obviously just some people who are a pain in the ass... 😤
    just because she looks young doesn't mean she is young....

  • |
  • 8
  • post #98459
    240 410 8 Q

    nagiman90 said:
    This would be awesome, especially in themes, like Nurse Edition, Maid Edition, Lingerie Edition, Sex Toys, etc...

    The idea was to create different breeds, but I'll consider those options too. By the way, I have some free time today. Second cover soon?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98449
    434 787 6 E
    post #98385
    111 192 4 E
    55 79 5 E

    ashgothorns said:
    I thought so at first glance, took me a bit to realize the leftmost finger had 2 nails, one growing form below.

    Hm, maybe so. I guess there's something there. I kinda overlooked it as indescernible since it's a sketchy style. I guess maybe I'm more forgiving of AI works when it comes to less glaring anatomical issues, considering what it sometimes throws out there, especially with pieces that use uncommon art styles.

  • |
  • 2
  • 55 79 5 E

    kingk said:
    Okay seriously mods, is this all the same person? What's the issue now? He has glaucoma? He's trans? I thought abusing the flag system was bannable? I know I'm also not supposed to complain, but it really seems as though somebody just has a vendetta, or an unrealistic expectation of an AI site.

    I thought so at first glance, took me a bit to realize the leftmost finger had 2 nails, one growing form below.

  • |
  • 0
  • 55 79 5 E
    post #66628
    101 169 5 E
    75 112 4 E

    I honestly didn't see this as young, based on her proportions and the tilt towards a breast in the first panel. It's just a flat coloring style common to anime that makes a shaved puss look hairless.

    I guess you see what you want to see.

    Updated

  • |
  • 12
  • 58 86 9 E

    danzabowo said:
    They usually cite it in your profile when it's deleted. I'm not sure either, but I assume maybe the teeth? idk

    Yeah that's all I can think of, but I don't see where odd creatures are against the guidelines. I mean, call him a kelpie if it makes you feel better. How is that not okay, but charr and bugbears are?

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98479
    156 265 3 E

    She's beautiful, and that blush is sooo adorable! I just wanna scoop her up and never let go 🥰

  • |
  • 1
  • post #98465
    59 125 1 E
    post #98454
    112 172 5 E
    post #92833
    298 411 16 E

    anotherfurryfan4679 said:
    So I take it the batfolk from that one image are from a different region? So Volume 3 eventually?

    Thanks! Funny you ask - the bat was in this lineup during the WIP phase. I ended up removing her though, they're more suitable for another thematic volume. So yes, something for later.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98493
    182 337 9 E

    I didn't pay much attention to the story at first, but when I read that it was the first comic on this site, I reread it from the beginning and have to say, it's not bad.
    Now I'm really curious to see how the story continues.

  • |
  • 10
  • post #98489
    180 309 4 E
    46 42 3 S
    post #98459
    240 410 8 Q

    This would be awesome, especially in themes, like Nurse Edition, Maid Edition, Lingerie Edition, Sex Toys, etc...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #98454
    112 172 5 E

    Actually, Saint in a church ? That idea is just so obvious that nobody have ever done it lmao, and I love it !

  • |
  • 1
  • 64 91 3 E
    64 91 3 E
    post #96282
    149 268 2 E
    post #81891
    137 271 4 E
    post #10359
    87 180 1 E
    post #98371
    192 332 7 E

    furriestguninthewest said:
    Yeah they're getting a bit excessive with the quality requirements. There are so many where I just can not find what they could possibly be complaining about.

    I flagged one a couple weeks ago here, legs bent horribly wrong.
    It was left up, but oh god you have a sixth knuckle that can only be seen by enlarging and nitpicking.
    Getting to the bullshit level.
    What about the hundreds of old crap posts here they won't delete.

    Believe it, the other site suddenly claims to have standards, just fricking funny with thousands of absolute shitposts they won't dump.
    I think they are both owned by the same person(s) being set up identically.

  • |
  • 4
  • 55 79 5 E
    post #53017
    59 84 1 E
    post #98456
    242 385 5 E
    post #98406
    138 256 5 E
    post #98421
    215 386 3 E

    The dog anthro is perfect - just change the human with a furry and it's gold tier

  • |
  • -10
  • 20 15 7 S
    46 42 3 S
    post #98143
    109 166 6 E
    post #98424
    120 134 1 S
    post #94939
    58 64 5 S

    Holy moly, she is a cutie-patooty even when she is angy.

    Great gen and thanks for sharing.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #66801
    170 309 1 E
    post #98371
    192 332 7 E

    ironhorse said:
    I liked the other post also ... the take downs are getting ridiculous ,, and they don't allow AI on e621 .. I thought the whole point of this site was to post art.

    Yeah they're getting a bit excessive with the quality requirements. There are so many where I just can not find what they could possibly be complaining about.

  • |
  • 2
  • 20 2 3 E
    post #66628
    101 169 5 E
    post #78755
    20 23 1 S
    post #92376
    305 484 3 E
    41 73 3 E
    post #98451
    72 79 3 S
    post #3
    124 122 46 S
    post #97427
    62 87 3 S
    post #98177
    117 204 16 Q

    feluniferal said:
    I made another post with the same character without the growth but I think I'm just gonna try to remake this one without the growth so it's just her walking.

    Honestly, I'd say just ignore the haters and keep doing whatever you're doing. It looks good for AI, too.

  • |
  • 5
  • 37 33 1 S
    post #98449
    434 787 6 E
    post #98371
    192 332 7 E

    I liked the other post also ... the take downs are getting ridiculous ,, and they don't allow AI on e621 .. I thought the whole point of this site was to post art.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #98456
    242 385 5 E
    post #98457
    303 431 9 E
    post #98459
    240 410 8 Q
    post #98431
    38 34 3 E
    21 30 1 E
    post #98451
    72 79 3 S
    post #98454
    112 172 5 E
    post #98458
    258 474 3 E
    post #98436
    194 351 4 E
    post #97756
    327 558 3 E
    post #98256
    163 264 1 E
    post #96902
    187 290 3 E
    post #94681
    154 250 4 Q
    post #98459
    240 410 8 Q
    post #98459
    240 410 8 Q
    post #98318
    309 553 2 E
    65 102 4 S
    post #98333
    184 330 3 E

    Always love seeing this pairing. Two furry queens engaged in some sweet lovin'

  • |
  • -1
  • post #98385
    111 192 4 E
    post #98416
    175 279 3 Q
    post #98439
    109 191 1 E
    post #98446
    174 317 1 E
    post #98459
    240 410 8 Q
    post #98436
    194 351 4 E
    post #98416
    175 279 3 Q