Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #21478
    15 24 6 S
    post #21761
    49 84 5 E
    post #21755
    87 126 4 E
    post #21665
    150 248 1 E
    post #21720
    192 334 9 E
    33 56 1 E

    If NSFW cub isn't allowed, then you can delete my account NOW. I don't want to be a part of a site that doesn't allow cub. Cope, Seethe, Kill yourselves.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #21670
    126 202 1 E
    post #21680
    35 58 2 E

    His armor was personally forged at Bethesda by Todd Howard,
    I mean, look how it glitches through his left chest.
    Outstanding work by Todd.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #21720
    192 334 9 E
    post #21731
    22 29 1 S
    post #21755
    87 126 4 E
    post #21595
    47 78 2 E

    Both are very pretty. But... I vote for the head on the left and the body on the right. Ears on the left are prettier too.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #21338
    56 83 2 E
    post #21682
    67 127 1 E
    post #21673
    161 294 2 E
    post #21680
    35 58 2 E
    2 0 2 Q
    post #21673
    161 294 2 E
    2 0 2 Q
    post #21696
    193 306 1 E
    post #21598
    136 235 1 E
    post #21602
    26 32 3 E
    post #21568
    152 275 2 E
    post #21611
    46 74 1 Q
    post #21672
    73 104 1 Q
    post #21495
    36 33 1 S
    post #21627
    146 301 2 E
    post #21628
    160 325 1 E
    post #21502
    5 21 4 E

    lickit69 said:
    Wouldn't a bullet be quicker?

    True, but it would not get the desired results: To show their dedication and willingness to go the extra mile to their Sire, Lord Abraxas.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #21509
    39 44 2 E
    post #21421
    162 274 1 E
    post #21633
    158 261 2 E

    yoshiba said:
    Ferals in lingerie is just so satisfying... appreciating all your pictures lately!

    I agree with you!
    It is my favourite niche of images.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #21508
    34 44 1 E
    post #21633
    158 261 2 E
    post #21502
    5 21 4 E

    reyneke said:
    Funny. That is a question I have been asking myself :)

    But, to answer your question, there is a rhyme and a reason behind that. In-universe Niko (and all of my other characters) exist in, have a reason to choose as they choose and do what they do.

    Wouldn't a bullet be quicker?

  • |
  • -1
  • post #21580
    46 70 1 E
    post #21509
    39 44 2 E
    post #21480
    33 54 1 Q
    post #21602
    26 32 3 E
    173 319 1 E
    post #21502
    5 21 4 E

    lickit69 said:
    The fuck is wrong with people?

    Funny. That is a question I have been asking myself :)

    But, to answer your question, there is a rhyme and a reason behind that. In-universe Niko (and all of my other characters) exist in, have a reason to choose as they choose and do what they do.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #21569
    9 15 1 E
    post #21602
    26 32 3 E
    post #21532
    6 24 1 E
    post #21502
    5 21 4 E
    post #21471
    97 145 1 Q
    post #21544
    15 28 1 E
    post #21497
    32 45 1 Q
    post #21320
    92 155 1 E
    post #21341
    37 38 6 S

    Aah! I begin to understand a little. I can see how ai generation would be referencing mostly character-focused art, so blending them with the scenery would be more difficult as its used to propping the character up in front of a background, instead of them being more.. integrated? Still, I am eager to witness your results. Good luck!

    Looking for examples, here is another image that is a bit closer to the kind composition I had in mind: post #19634. With that detail though I wonder how much is ai and how much the 'director' actually draws in on top, and then maybe does another ai pass to flesh-out their additions. (kudos to oldhroft, it must be a lot of work)

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #11788
    143 266 4 E

    aireveries said:
    And who made it then? Who did this piece?
    I'll tell you: He made it. With Ai tools.
    People like you don't seem to realizie the time and efferot it takes to achieve such polished results.
    Try it, before speaking.

    For quality like this I'd gladly support him with a Burger a month worth of value for his time.

    Keep up the good work! <3

    Spending less than 3 hours typing prompts and repeatedly generating an image until there is something usable isn’t a lot of effort.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #21323
    35 48 3 Q
    post #21478
    15 24 6 S
    post #21485
    113 167 1 E
    post #21478
    15 24 6 S
    post #18586
    64 123 1 E
    post #21387
    83 141 1 E
    post #21433
    27 51 1 E
    post #21341
    37 38 6 S

    digitaldigger said:
    Oh, I kinda feel presumptuous enough already suggesting the above things, I wouldn't want to impose. But if I may maybe explain my earlier thoughts a bit better; it's always a shame when cropping an existing image to fit a resolution that part of the scene is lost. Sure everyone uses different resolutions but I think the 16:9 ratio, either landscape for desktops or portrait for phones would fit most. Beyond that, scenes you 'can get lost in' like forests, fantasy ruins, nightime cities etc give your eyes something to wander over that arent just the character posing in the scene, so you don't get tired of the image. You have done some cute furs and avians in previous images, I wouldn't mind seeing them relaxing or posing in environments that are just as pretty. Hmm, like, this image has lovely scenery, though the character takes up most of it, so maybe something a bit further away from the character?

    Rambled a bit there, thanks for listening!

    Not imposing or presumptuous at all! :) AI art is the sorta thing I like to do as sort of an aimless side activity while doing other things... sorta a "set it and forget it" background task, and then if anything inspiring spawns, I'll spend a couple of hours focusing on that until I get an output that I like. Since I never have any defined direction I start with, it makes it real easy to try out new things as requested.

    What you ask might be a bit of a good challenge, actually. Most furry artwork is focused on the character in question, so the machine is trying to recreate that. Zooming out is easy- it's just infilling around the edges- but the result is that you still have an image where the focus is still on the character. You can shift it left or right all you want, but the character will still appear "central," and often out of scale. My first few attempts have all felt rather lackluster, but I'm always up for a good challenge.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #21379
    93 190 1 E
    post #21438
    58 83 1 E
    post #21341
    37 38 6 S

    I first was thinking about this with this image, post #11963. Something like: if there was a bit more tree to fill the scene and the character was part of it instead of the only focus. But! I have no idea the process of this AI generation or how hard it is to fill out scenery, so what I am suggesting may not really be feasible. Still I'd love to see how you go with it!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #21341
    37 38 6 S

    Oh, I kinda feel presumptuous enough already suggesting the above things, I wouldn't want to impose. But if I may maybe explain my earlier thoughts a bit better; it's always a shame when cropping an existing image to fit a resolution that part of the scene is lost. Sure everyone uses different resolutions but I think the 16:9 ratio, either landscape for desktops or portrait for phones would fit most. Beyond that, scenes you 'can get lost in' like forests, fantasy ruins, nightime cities etc give your eyes something to wander over that arent just the character posing in the scene, so you don't get tired of the image. You have done some cute furs and avians in previous images, I wouldn't mind seeing them relaxing or posing in environments that are just as pretty. Hmm, like, this image has lovely scenery, though the character takes up most of it, so maybe something a bit further away from the character?

    Rambled a bit there, thanks for listening!

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #21425
    92 180 1 E
    post #21098
    37 66 2 Q

    parszuki said:
    Oh my, who created you, my beauty deer! Gilgadex?
    What prompt and settings did the author use, and would you like to share it? Those beautiful udders on the belly....

    generator: pixai.art
    model: ONE FOR ALL furry v2.0
    loras: Better eyes+face+skin v1.0 at 0.7, Arm Grab Sex v1.0 at 0.7, Metal Collar 金属製首輪 v1.0 at 0.7

    prompt: female (deer), anthro, perfect eyes, long eyelashes, (deer), (red hair, open hair), brown fur, blue eyes, (eyelashes), BREAK (detailed background:1.3, (moan:1.5, (cinematic lighting), detailed ambient light, (detailed lighting), cute anatomy, (ambient light on the body), [by taran fiddler], by Foxovh, (sharp focus), (masterpiece, warm lighting, best quality, hi res, high resolution, high details, absurd res), (sex from behind, Doggystyle, Penetration), human on anthro, <lora:more_details:0.6>, <lora:furthermoreV9:0.8> high detail, highly detailed, (hyper realistic, intricate, intricate sharp details), (intricate details:1.4), (masterpiece:1.3), (best quality:1.4), (ultra highres:1.2), BREAK anthropomorphic:1.2, white-tailed deer:1.4, doe:1.4, BREAK female, 1girl, (solo), (animal genitalia:1.4), anatomically correct, flat chest, tail, sensual, animal pussy, (udder with four teats:1.4) Deer, hooves, brown hair, teal eyes, adult, female adult, female, solo, pussy, ass, medium breasts, young, deer tail, deer ears, long hair, single braid, french braid, bathroom, shower, running water, showering, steam, steaming body, dripping, dripping water, water droplets, hot, sexy, cute, innocent, shy, playful, tease, teasing, soap bubbles,Arm_Grab_Sex,metal collar

    negative prompt: worst quality, large head, low quality, extra digits, bad eye, EasyNegativeV2, ng_deepnegative_v1_75t

    DPM++ 2M Karras at 20 sampling steps

    cfg scale 6

    clip skip 2

    default vae model

  • |
  • 1
  • post #21373
    108 199 1 E
    post #14978
    55 76 2 Q
    post #20873
    262 426 2 E
    post #21300
    61 106 1 E
    post #21402
    72 98 1 E
    post #21417
    33 37 2 S
    post #21327
    16 22 2 S
    39 74 2 E

    Very nice!!! Have you tried to do any of the others? Fifi? Bimbette? Minnie? ^.^ If these turned out so good I am sure you could do just as good!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #21338
    56 83 2 E