Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #15361
    27 54 1 Q
    post #14626
    65 109 2 E
    post #15356
    585 1.0k 11 E
    post #7090
    166 291 3 E
    post #13503
    75 107 2 E
    post #14574
    126 241 5 E

    user 5965

    Member

    dragon_longsword said:
    Hah, what do you mean? The image? I leave all my metadata intact, you can download the image and see the prompt I used.

    This is great work, I'm also curious. I can see the prompt, but I'm a total noob at deciphering it. What model is this? is it local?

  • |
  • 0
    •
    11 14 2 E

    Kiyoka

    Member

    Hey guys, did you know that in terms of male human and female Pokémon breeding, Vaporeon is the most compatible Pokémon for humans? Not only are they in the field egg group, which is mostly comprised of mammals, Vaporeon are an average of 3”03’ tall and 63.9 pounds, this means they’re large enough to be able to handle human dicks, and with their impressive Base Stats for HP and access to Acid Armor, you can be rough with one. Due to their mostly water-based biology, there’s no doubt in my mind that an aroused Vaporeon would be incredibly wet, so wet that you could easily have sex with one for hours without getting sore. They can also learn the moves Attract, Baby-Doll Eyes, Captivate, Charm, and Tail Whip, along with not having fur to hide nipples, so it’d be incredibly easy for one to get you in the mood. With their abilities Water Absorb and Hydration, they can easily recover from fatigue with enough water. No other Pokémon comes close to this level of compatibility. Also, fun fact, if you pull out enough, you can make your Vaporeon turn white. Vaporeon is literally built for human dick. Ungodly defense stat+high HP pool+Acid Armor means it can take cock all day, all shapes and sizes and still come for more.

  • |
  • -3
    •
    post #15138
    21 21 2 S
    post #15346
    25 2 1 E
    post #15339
    53 79 1 E
    post #15008
    13 18 7 E
    post #15285
    96 109 8 E
    post #15264
    13 32 2 E

    Eqlipse

    Member

    Love your stuff! But... why no director tag? :( Makes finding the rest of your uploads a tad difficult ^_^; (plus, that's also how I organize files: by creator, lol!)

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #15264
    13 32 2 E

    Kiyoka

    Member

    Great work on it! Both the transformation sequence and species/gender change! Hope to see more of this type of generations here.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #15260
    34 79 1 Q
    post #15285
    96 109 8 E
    post #13846
    55 87 8 E

    Nenvul

    Member

    parszuki said:
    Unfortunately, I cannot use the tool "purrfectmerge" or "bb95":(

    https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1r32DLdntQ-PWgLUEQW5eDYi8-MukyFP3
    But the initial results are pleasing to the eye. How adorably she BLUSHES, and modestly covers her charms!!
    I'll work on the hints closer to the weekend, but the clue you gave me is good. Thanks!

    https://mega.nz/folder/R6h2VR7Y#mszMTntuL31nLDruBAdl-Q
    I can't give her bigger breasts without significantly changing the whole picture

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #15292
    30 40 2 S
    post #15285
    96 109 8 E
    post #15276
    39 82 1 E
    post #15005
    33 32 1 S
    post #15273
    223 419 1 E
    post #15126
    25 59 3 Q
    post #14660
    46 80 5 Q

    Kiyoka

    Member

    nexor said:
    I can understand the concerns and should the artist have a problem with the image I would remove it without hesitation ,I see it as a tribute to his character

    Perfectly understandable but you know how people can be. Even artists don't usually draw other people's OCs unless they get permission. Not singling you out or anything either, just a general concern I have which is why I don't post OCs unless it's from a franchise which is more open to 'fanart'.

  • |
  • -1
    •
    post #15243
    81 120 2 E
    post #15248
    75 151 1 E
    post #15224
    66 119 1 E
    post #10367
    85 134 6 E

    Marcus64

    Member

    marcus said:
    LOL I wouldn't doubt it. The pic is still amazing. Any female worgen content in the works?

    Never thought about making worgen, I promise nothing, but if I have an idea that uses it, why not.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #9662
    63 98 1 E
    post #9740
    74 121 5 E
    post #10367
    85 134 6 E

    Nocheamante

    Member

    marcus64 said:
    What if I told you that it was you who pointed it out to me.

    LOL I wouldn't doubt it. The pic is still amazing. Any female worgen content in the works?

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #12115
    23 47 1 E
    post #15031
    31 50 2 Q
    post #15029
    43 68 4 E
    post #15029
    43 68 4 E
    post #14557
    24 35 1 E
    post #14560
    75 128 2 E

    Nocheamante

    Member

    Very beautiful, IMHO this is the perfect mix of human/canid. Add the claws and digitigrade feet and there is perfection.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #13509
    55 101 1 E
    post #15142
    164 319 1 E
    post #15150
    158 257 1 E
    post #10190
    48 70 3 E

    FreeSillyString

    Member

    moglo said:
    have promp this?

    I usually save prompts for things I generate when starting with txt2img. I generated this starting from another image in img2img so unfortunately I don't have the prompt saved. I would post if I had it (I've got prompts for most of my other uploads)

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #15201
    4 9 1 E
    post #14981
    6 18 3 E

    KifuUsaki

    Member

    Indeed. Love this, "series", I guess you could call it. I have a folder dedicated for these beach/wedding/gathering settings from this director. But this one image doesn't meet the normal standards I've come to expect.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #15139
    114 219 1 E
    post #15070
    585 1.0k 5 E

    Stufferman

    Member

    So does the owl only come out when the sex is happening or done? I notice she wasn't there in the first version, starting to think it is more voyeur owl than judgemental owl :)

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #14981
    6 18 3 E

    Waraen

    Member

    celeste_shamrock said:
    Several directing errors here. Foreground character anatomy clipping and positioning errors. Multiple errors on background characters, mostly hands and leg issues. Tan foreground female character missing lower jaw. Foreground red-brown female character multiple ears, face/jaw/mouth errors, multiple legs. Furthest background character severely deformed and incomplete.

    I kinda wonder about the quality control.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #4876
    251 425 1 E
    post #15151
    178 290 1 E
    post #15123
    66 96 1 Q
    post #15074
    9 34 2 S

    BlackGum

    Member

    leonoser said:
    Fishnet stuff is often tricky, but it turned out great here!

    Painfully aware, but thank you. I tend to get better luck with the word 'mesh'.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #15126
    25 59 3 Q
    post #15100
    65 119 2 E
    post #15108
    21 59 8 E
    post #15122
    62 100 2 E
    post #15108
    21 59 8 E
    post #15103
    12 12 3 E
    post #15103
    12 12 3 E
    post #15074
    9 34 2 S
    post #15079
    13 51 1 S
    post #14978
    55 76 2 Q

    Kio Redpaw

    Member

    It's more than letting a young cub see her private place, he's gets to give grooming licks there too.

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #15093
    56 81 1 E
    post #14940
    763 1.3k 5 E
    post #15041
    101 208 3 E

    AnonTk

    Member

    blackgum said:
    Looks great, what was used to generate this one?

    Here's the prompt:

    <lora:kathrin-vaughan-v1-fluffyrock:1.0>, kathrin-vaughan, (best quality, masterpiece:1), solo, furry female anthro, fur texture, (nude, consentacles, vaginal penetration, anal penetration, double penetration, oral penetration, tentacle grab, tentacle in mouth, tentacle in pussy, tentacle in ass, tentacle around breast, tentacle around leg, tentacle penetration, tentacle sex, arms above head, all three filled), (oral penetration, thick tentacles, until they like it, ahegao, orgasm face, eyes rolled back, fucked silly, multiple insertions, mulitple penetration, restrained, twitching, suspended via penetration), (bodily fluids, cum, cum in pussy, anal juice, cum in mouth), blushing, fingers, finger claws, teal eyes, medium hair, large breasts, wolf tail, (outdoors, forest), upper body shot, by zackary911, by fluff-kevlar, by wizzikt, by ruaidri, by braeburned, by dacad, by zaush

Negative prompt: worst quality, low quality, monochrome, conjoined fingers, deformed fingers, (bad-hands-5), all the way through
  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #15029
    43 68 4 E

    FeralBreeder

    Member

    What I like of the other version is the presence of jewels and the larger areolas of one of the mares, but definitely prefer this version.
    Thanks for sharing.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #15008
    13 18 7 E
    post #15041
    101 208 3 E
    post #12759
    36 65 1 Q
    post #14941
    109 161 5 E

    ForbiddenTome

    Member

    liquidscales said:
    The model I was experimenting with (YiffyMix) doesn't quite have the data for wyvern-like poses and mammals, and found arms up and arms out to have the most success for bats. Completely removing arms by adding similar descriptors to negative prompts also did the trick for some poses like this one.

    As expected, I used inpainting and rebaked just the wings a couple dozen times to get a pair that looked decent at the current resolution.

    That's very useful, thanks. I've also had issues with bat wings.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #15029
    43 68 4 E
    post #15008
    13 18 7 E

    GoldAnthroWolf

    Member

    Of all the things I thought I'd never seen porn of, of course, someone does it up cause of AI. What a time to be alive!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    109 171 1 E
    post #7780
    59 88 2 E
    post #14940
    763 1.3k 5 E