Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #15008
    13 18 7 E
    post #15041
    101 209 3 E
    post #12759
    36 65 1 Q
    post #14941
    109 160 5 E

    liquidscales said:
    The model I was experimenting with (YiffyMix) doesn't quite have the data for wyvern-like poses and mammals, and found arms up and arms out to have the most success for bats. Completely removing arms by adding similar descriptors to negative prompts also did the trick for some poses like this one.

    As expected, I used inpainting and rebaked just the wings a couple dozen times to get a pair that looked decent at the current resolution.

    That's very useful, thanks. I've also had issues with bat wings.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #15029
    43 67 4 E
    post #15008
    13 18 7 E

    Of all the things I thought I'd never seen porn of, of course, someone does it up cause of AI. What a time to be alive!

  • |
  • 3
  • 109 170 1 E
    post #7780
    59 86 2 E
    post #14940
    769 1.3k 5 E
    post #14910
    62 100 1 E
    post #15008
    13 18 7 E
    post #15008
    13 18 7 E
    post #14981
    6 18 3 E

    Several directing errors here. Foreground character anatomy clipping and positioning errors. Multiple errors on background characters, mostly hands and leg issues. Tan foreground female character missing lower jaw. Foreground red-brown female character multiple ears, face/jaw/mouth errors, multiple legs. Furthest background character severely deformed and incomplete.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #14667
    94 182 2 E

    That's absolutely amazing!
    I'm so glad you moved to female characters too, cause I have always admired the quality of your images, but I'm not attracted by males.
    I would love to see a version with an anatomically correct vagina, if possible.
    Thanks for sharing!

  • |
  • 5
  • post #14834
    132 245 1 E
    post #14835
    125 239 1 E
    post #14938
    95 179 2 E
    post #14941
    109 160 5 E
    109 190 2 E

    It would be an amazing image if the vagina wouldn't be so unrealistically sized, but that's just my opinion...
    I think her muzzle is amazingly realistic, and I really like her detailed fur too.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #14985
    83 181 1 E

    I absolutely love both her face and her position, and I really like the pawpads.
    I appreciate the background, I think it is detailed enough.
    Thanks for sharing.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #14941
    109 160 5 E

    terraraptor said:
    Rare species, nice. I wonder how long this took, because I've tried bats before and they take awhile 'cause of AI really struggling with the wings.

    The model I was experimenting with (YiffyMix) doesn't quite have the data for wyvern-like poses and mammals, and found arms up and arms out to have the most success for bats. Completely removing arms by adding similar descriptors to negative prompts also did the trick for some poses like this one.

    As expected, I used inpainting and rebaked just the wings a couple dozen times to get a pair that looked decent at the current resolution.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #14461
    46 98 2 E
    post #14941
    109 160 5 E
    post #14940
    769 1.3k 5 E

    oo123 said:
    to many choices!

    Nono, i'm not struggling to decide which one to fuck, i'm trying to decide which ongoing rat joke to go for. Do i go for the R.O.U.S? Do I make a skaven reference? Maybe a bit of Jerma?

    One vote for Skaven, please.

  • |
  • 8
  • post #14941
    109 160 5 E

    Rare species, nice. I wonder how long this took, because I've tried bats before and they take awhile 'cause of AI really struggling with the wings.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #13702
    18 29 1 E
    95 162 2 E

    Not anatomically correct, balls are not placed correctly.
    Between the rear legs, not that.

  • |
  • -7
  • 109 190 2 E
    post #14940
    769 1.3k 5 E

    to many choices!

    Nono, i'm not struggling to decide which one to fuck, i'm trying to decide which ongoing rat joke to go for. Do i go for the R.O.U.S? Do I make a skaven reference? Maybe a bit of Jerma?

  • |
  • 6
  • post #14938
    95 179 2 E
    post #14937
    33 35 1 S
    95 162 2 E
    post #14935
    30 70 1 E
    125 241 1 E
    post #14859
    19 50 1 Q
    post #14903
    16 14 1 S
    post #14660
    46 81 5 Q

    I can understand the concerns and should the artist have a problem with the image I would remove it without hesitation ,I see it as a tribute to his character

  • |
  • 1
  • post #14898
    54 79 1 E
    post #14660
    46 81 5 Q

    kiyoka said:
    While it's awesome I am not sure I'd advise making OCs of others without permission because they might want to raise a stink on the site about copyrighted content and could use it as an excuse. I know, unpopular opinion and all but you usually want to be on the safe side cause the artist might claim you used their art to train the LORA used. :(

    concuerdo, pero igual rico

  • |
  • 0
  • post #14890
    4 9 1 E
    post #14064
    82 154 1 E
    post #14691
    96 157 1 E
    post #14829
    22 33 1 E
    post #13956
    1 25 1 E
    post #14812
    88 131 2 E

    What artist was targeted for this render? You can see tags in the upper and lower left, but I don't recognize the signature style.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #14845
    63 117 2 E
    post #14061
    35 68 2 E
    post #14858
    100 166 1 E
    post #14697
    126 215 2 E
    post #14820
    25 42 1 E
    post #14845
    63 117 2 E
    post #14837
    85 144 1 E
    post #14802
    52 99 1 E
    post #14825
    90 155 1 E
    post #14416
    90 159 3 E
    post #14817
    78 119 2 E
    post #14799
    91 178 1 E
    post #14519
    46 88 4 E

    tuckster said:
    i don't have an account on there but i have seen multiple people here on e6ai say it's not working for them and that they get a "502 gateway" error. i checked google and it recommends to reset you're modem, try incognito mode or refresh browser it also might just be a problem on their end and we have to wait for them to fix it :(

    It is working now. I posted a few thing already ;)

  • |
  • 1
  • 34 0 3 Q
    post #14561
    26 36 2 E

    latexpony said:
    10/10 Here! I'm loving these Rodian girls. This is really something that you never see!

    Thank you, in all honesty I was surprised that so little else was done.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #14589
    84 146 2 E
    post #14797
    110 181 2 E
    post #14767
    61 133 1 E
    post #14734
    96 168 2 E
    34 0 3 Q
    post #14519
    46 88 4 E

    glue_sniffer said:
    Will do, but happyaccidentsai is not working for me rn. Can you check if it works on youre divice? For now i will look for something older from my gallery and post it when my posts will be approved

    i don't have an account on there but i have seen multiple people here on e6ai say it's not working for them and that they get a "502 gateway" error. i checked google and it recommends to reset you're modem, try incognito mode or refresh browser it also might just be a problem on their end and we have to wait for them to fix it :(

  • |
  • 0
  • post #14727
    35 53 3 E
    34 0 3 Q
    post #14737
    10 19 1 Q
    post #14561
    26 36 2 E
    post #14338
    92 149 2 E

    feralbreeder said:
    It is an amazing image, as usual by the Director.
    The genitals seem to be real flesh!
    For my own personal taste, the dildo or vibrator or whatever it is, unfortunately ruins everything.

    Thank you for all your comments, happy you like my "work". And that's some good insight as your opinions validity seems to be reflected in the amount of faves.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #14742
    30 45 2 E
    post #14697
    126 215 2 E
    post #14529
    288 451 2 E