Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #183694
    83 136 4 E
    post #184176
    39 59 2 E
    post #184348
    80 47 27 S

    DRLa

    Developer

    n_n said:
    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

    Posts approved before the current quality guidelined are allowed to stay. Otherwise we'd have to pretty much delete everything from the first two years of the site...

  • |
  • 11
  • post #184348
    80 47 27 S

    That tooth line is a bit thick on the front... could be dental abnormality. And that dot between the tail and body, possible artifact!

  • |
  • 5
  • post #184348
    80 47 27 S

    n n

    Member

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184348
    80 47 27 S

    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

  • |
  • 13
  • 48 3 2 Q
    post #184348
    80 47 27 S
    post #184348
    80 47 27 S

    ok lets get the Magnifying glass out and see if it is a Pass.

  • |
  • 7
  • post #184348
    80 47 27 S
    post #184348
    80 47 27 S
    34 36 9 Q

    n n

    Member

    Can't stop showing this to friends lol. This is just my kinda fun

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184274
    35 38 3 S

    n n

    Member

    grove_ellar said:
    I wish the depth of field wasn't so potent (for purely selfish reasons) but she does have gracefully enchanting eyes.

    I get ya 😉
    Luckily there are more great gens in the gallery to watch that aren't dof'd

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184347
    156 209 6 E
    post #184347
    156 209 6 E

    n n

    Member

    I think the only thing dropped here was pants XD

  • |
  • 6
  • post #182021
    47 66 2 Q
    post #184167
    153 237 7 E

    medicineball said:
    I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

    I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

    That's great to hear, thank you. Regarding the question, I mean that some things I generate work perfectly, without any inpainting or regeneration, but others, like this one, take a very long time to render. Most models probably aren't trained to do this, which is why the whole picture falls apart, even with a detailed sketch for Scribble. Idk, just trying to explain this to myself.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184340
    124 181 2 E

    n n

    Member

    Haven't seen such a sexy red squirrel in a while now :D

  • |
  • 2
  • post #184331
    64 78 2 Q
    post #184290
    57 79 8 E
    post #184327
    172 274 3 E
    post #184324
    69 90 1 Q
    post #184300
    32 43 2 Q

    A lot of Zoc's gens have this kind of subtle hint of fur texture that I absolutely adore: it gives just enough to impart a look of fuzzy softness without crossing into the territory of over-rendered, long rough fur. I must learn how to reproduce a similar effect by hand in Krita- it's so damn nice.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184318
    208 326 3 E
    post #184314
    68 136 2 E

    n n

    Member

    XD Ain't furry logic just the best? Girthy snake-balls and juicy peen complete with foreskin :P

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184303
    94 142 1 E

    n n

    Member

    Treat the lovely lady to some molerat kebabs ❤️

  • |
  • 2
  • post #184274
    35 38 3 S

    n_n said:
    These closeups of precious kobold faces are such a treat ❤️

    I wish the depth of field wasn't so potent (for purely selfish reasons) but she does have gracefully enchanting eyes.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #184028
    89 143 2 E

    zheneric said:
    I might just "accidentally" trip and fall while appearing to steal some copper.

    Oh don't worry, I'm sure they'll help you get back up (after you get down), they're not bad sports.

    Only issue is that the law usually arrives before they get the chance to. Turns out a knot at each end is a pretty effective way of keeping a person detained. (°ー°〃)

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • 34 36 9 Q
    post #184314
    68 136 2 E
    post #184219
    30 34 1 E
    post #184343
    109 152 2 E
    post #184167
    153 237 7 E

    ilillililli said:
    Btw... By looking at some works on the site I am feeling like I am using some sort of orchish technics. Some others having a more clean results. I've tried to switch between models, experimented with upscalers/without them... Still the result is much worse. What am I doing wrong?!

    I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

    I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184315
    105 150 1 E
    post #184318
    208 326 3 E
    post #184322
    129 189 6 E
    post #184327
    172 274 3 E
    post #183675
    105 100 9 S

    TerraRaptor

    Privileged

    turtonturakon11 said:
    My first impression of them being extremelly cold, aloof, distant. I thought befriending with them is borderline impossible.

    Yeah, course correction, I may have overdone it in the earlier art. There is some of that, but ultimately, individuality still allows for all types.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #182817
    124 202 3 E
    post #183867
    73 71 10 E
    12 16 1 Q
    post #184288
    81 114 2 E
    post #184289
    72 93 3 E

    n n

    Member

    Well deserved 🥰 & bonus ear scratches

  • |
  • 2
  • post #184061
    18 14 1 S
    87 0 6 E
    34 36 9 Q
    post #183990
    149 214 2 E

    Because she always says yes (and is probably a great lover too)

  • |
  • 2
  • post #184028
    89 143 2 E

    I might just "accidentally" trip and fall while appearing to steal some copper.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184027
    92 83 5 Q

    She'd give the best hugs bar none.

    She definitely looks more feline. What species did you have in mind?

  • |
  • 3
  • post #183890
    27 18 5 S
    post #184024
    76 87 2 E
    post #184112
    194 312 3 E
    post #184109
    277 423 7 E
    post #184180
    94 128 2 E
    post #184202
    76 129 3 E
    post #184234
    156 262 2 E
    post #184285
    57 95 1 E
    post #184287
    117 156 4 E
    post #184288
    81 114 2 E
    87 0 6 E
    34 36 9 Q
    post #184286
    32 45 2 E
    34 36 9 Q
    post #184222
    151 230 1 E
    post #184233
    137 234 3 E
    post #184176
    39 59 2 E
    post #184269
    65 96 10 E

    n n

    Member

    ducksiri said:
    Gotta show her a good time! The night is still young! 😉

    Too true

  • |
  • 2
  • 48 3 2 Q
    post #183646
    3 7 1 E
    34 36 9 Q
    post #184070
    30 35 1 E
    34 36 9 Q
    34 36 9 Q
    post #184269
    65 96 10 E

    n_n said:
    Very sweet action 🥰 I can't wait to see what he has in store :P

    Gotta show her a good time! The night is still young! 😉

  • |
  • 3
  • 97 146 2 E

    n n

    Member

    I'm so torn between wanting to set her free and also wanting to see what happens next to her >_>"

  • |
  • 2