Topic: [BUR] Happy Tree Friends

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

dfY6C

Privileged

The bulk update request #635 is pending approval.

create implication cuddles_(htf) (3) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication flaky_(htf) (4) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication flippy_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication giggles_(htf) (2) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication lammy_(htf) (3) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication lifty_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication lumpy_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication nutty_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication petunia_(htf) (2) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication pop_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication shifty_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication splendid_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication toothy_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication cub_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication disco_bear_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication handy_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication mime_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication mr._pickels_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create alias mr_pickels_(htf) (0) -> mr._pickels_(htf) (0)
create implication russell_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication sniffles_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication the_mole_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication happy_tree_friends (11) -> mondo_media (0)

Reason: Missing implications brought up by gridanon on Discord. A little over half of these are ported from e621, although all of the ones after Toothy are entirely new additions. These other names are based on the e621 wiki pages for the HTF characters having these characters listed on there, but e621 did not have implications implemented for them yet. There is one alias to handle a potential punctuation confusion.

Updated

dfY6C

Privileged

flowersylveon said:
shouldn't happy_tree_friends also imply mondo_media?

I'm not too familiar with HTF so I was going off of what I could immediately see from the e621 wikis, and they didn't have a mondo_media implication so I just wasn't aware. I've added your suggestion to the BUR.

dfy6c said:
I'm not too familiar with HTF so I was going off of what I could immediately see from the e621 wikis, and they didn't have a mondo_media implication so I just wasn't aware. I've added your suggestion to the BUR.

mondo media does indie animation stuff which in turns is kinda of like, sponsor to htf to put in an extremely simplified sense

dfY6C

Privileged

The bulk update request #638 is pending approval.

create implication fliqpy_(htf) (0) -> flippy_(htf) (0)
create implication giggles'_mother_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication splendont_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication the_rat_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication tricksy_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication barthur_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication edward_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication tiger_general_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication ka-pow!_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication pockets_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication panda_baby_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication panda_mom_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication sweets_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication the_ants_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication sensei_orangutan_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication elaine_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication char_sui_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication whistle_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication ricky_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication zoe_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication quentin_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication cursed_idol_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication buddhist_monkey_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication tiger_soldier_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)
create implication webster_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (11)

Reason: Went ahead and collected more HTF tags with existing posts on e621. There's something I'm slightly unsure of, and that's specifically fliqpy_(htf). From my bit of research, this is a split personality character to Flippy, and I genuinely don't know the standard for how split personality characters get tagged (e621 doesn't have an existing implication for this tag). Doing a quick search on e621 seems to show that the general consensus is to tag both on a Fliqpy post even if it only shows one body. With that as my reference, I have Fliqpy currently set to imply Flippy rather than skipping straight to happy_tree_friends, but I just want to be sure if people are ok with this here. Part 2

Updated