Topic: [APPROVED] [BUR] Happy Tree Friends

dfY6C

Privileged

The bulk update request #638 is active.

create implication fliqpy_(htf) (0) -> flippy_(htf) (0)
create implication giggles'_mother_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication splendont_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication the_rat_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication tricksy_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication barthur_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication edward_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication tiger_general_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication ka-pow!_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication pockets_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication panda_baby_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication panda_mom_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication sweets_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication the_ants_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication sensei_orangutan_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication elaine_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication char_sui_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication whistle_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication ricky_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication zoe_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication quentin_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication cursed_idol_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication buddhist_monkey_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication tiger_soldier_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)
create implication webster_(htf) (0) -> happy_tree_friends (28)

Reason: Went ahead and collected more HTF tags with existing posts on e621. There's something I'm slightly unsure of, and that's specifically fliqpy_(htf). From my bit of research, this is a split personality character to Flippy, and I genuinely don't know the standard for how split personality characters get tagged (e621 doesn't have an existing implication for this tag). Doing a quick search on e621 seems to show that the general consensus is to tag both on a Fliqpy post even if it only shows one body. With that as my reference, I have Fliqpy currently set to imply Flippy rather than skipping straight to happy_tree_friends, but I just want to be sure if people are ok with this here. Part 2

EDIT: The bulk update request #638 (forum #4612) has been approved by @mlem.

Updated by auto moderator