Topic: Perspective/close-up anomalies.

Posted under General

kalethOrebiter

Privileged

As far as I understand it, anatomical anomalies and weird joint angles refers to error made during AI generation.

Example: Mismatching count of fingers/toes between hand/feet of the same pair, missing limbs, mangled limbs, etc.

As far as I know, lack of consistency between multiple representations of the same character is not ground for deletion.. but maybe Jelloponies might want to chime in.

Oarebt

Member

Probably best to wait for a staff member to have a more clear answer.

As for my opinion, feel like that if you have multiple panel with a character, you should be responsible to keep it consistent as much as possible.
Maybe not having everything exactly the same depending angle and pose, but at the minimum should have the same anatomy.

kalethOrebiter

Privileged

oarebt said:
Probably best to wait for a staff member to have a more clear answer.

Out of curiosity, what is unclear? There is absolutely nothing in the uploading guidelines that mandate a character to be consistent from depiction to depiction, even in the same image.

Rules are reviewed when that kind of edge case happens — I poked the head admin to make sure, but I'm very very confident in my answer.

Now you might not like the answer, it might goes against what you feel is right, but discarding an answer from a member just because they are not staff member without even offering a rational grounded in the rules is just rude.

Oarebt

Member

kalethorebiter said:
Now you might not like the answer, it might goes against what you feel is right, but discarding an answer from a member just because they are not staff member without even offering a rational grounded in the rules is just rude.

Umm, what are you talking about?
I was not answering to your message at all, I was just sending my thought in regard to the original question. Your message could have not been there and I would have said the same thing o.o

You are not a staff member, so even if your answer is quite accurate in regard to the current guidelines, it might be something the they did not think about when making/updating the guidelines. The why waiting for a staff member answer would be more certain.

And you said it yourself just now:

kalethorebiter said:
Rules are reviewed when that kind of edge case happens

So, not sure how you thought I was disregarding your answer when you yourself seems to feels the same way that this could be an edge case that they might want to check to adjust the guidelines or not.

mlem

Moderator

I'm not sure why a simple misunderstanding had to devolve into a mini-crashout, but the reason there's been no communication from staff yet is because we're still actively debating what our stance on this is.

Thank you for bringing this up, Tamrad, we'll get back with an answer soon.

kalethOrebiter

Privileged

oarebt said:
/snip

My last answers, including the one hidden was extremely rude.

I want to publicly apologize.

I've been arrogant, mean and antagonistic. I shouldn't had taken your answer personally.

I'm in the wrong. I'm sorry.