Topic: [APPROVED] [BUR] sunderring ambient_ implication from specie tags

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #411 is active.

remove implication ambient_arthropod (59) -> arthropod (1119)
remove implication ambient_arachnid (0) -> arachnid (97)
remove implication ambient_crustacean (0) -> crustacean (20)
remove implication ambient_coral (68) -> coral (3)
remove implication ambient_fish (16) -> fish (991)
remove implication ambient_jellyfish (0) -> jellyfish (9)
remove implication ambient_barnacle (0) -> barnacle (0)
remove implication ambient_starfish (9) -> asterozoan (83)
remove implication ambient_insect (59) -> insect (658)
remove implication ambient_ant (0) -> ant (18)
remove implication ambient_bee (0) -> bee (93)
remove implication ambient_beetle (0) -> beetle (85)
remove implication ambient_butterfly (26) -> butterfly (115)
remove implication ambient_fly (0) -> dipteran (6)
remove implication ambient_firefly (19) -> firefly (79)
remove implication ambient_ladybug (0) -> ladybug (1)
remove implication ambient_moth (0) -> moth (95)
remove implication ambient_myriapod (0) -> myriapod (16)
remove implication ambient_bird (61) -> bird (3258)
remove implication ambient_owl (0) -> owl (489)

Reason:

1. Most of the time, we see very simplified version of the ambient_<specie>.

  • most of the time the level of detail is too low to really tell some shapes apart. e.g. are the ambient feys or butterflies?
  • Sometimes we just don't see them e.g. ambient fireflies are only flying wisp-like floating lights.

 

2. Users are much less likely to forget to tag the species of the characters, than forget to tag for ambient_<specie>.

  • E.i. *if* both specie and ambient_<specie> can apply, there's little change the that <specie> will have to be added by auto insertion of the implication.
  • Also gives more flexibility to the taggers to not include a specie tag if they deems that specie to not be present in the artwork.

 

3. e621 have don't have those links.

 

post #36645 post #112571 post #61160

EDIT: The bulk update request #411 (forum #3682) has been approved by @Jelloponies.

Updated by auto moderator