Topic: [APPROVED] [BUR] sunderring ambient_ implication from specie tags

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #411 is active.

remove implication ambient_arthropod (52) -> arthropod (1043)
remove implication ambient_arachnid (0) -> arachnid (91)
remove implication ambient_crustacean (0) -> crustacean (18)
remove implication ambient_coral (68) -> coral (1)
remove implication ambient_fish (15) -> fish (940)
remove implication ambient_jellyfish (0) -> jellyfish (9)
remove implication ambient_barnacle (0) -> barnacle (0)
remove implication ambient_starfish (7) -> asterozoan (77)
remove implication ambient_insect (52) -> insect (616)
remove implication ambient_ant (0) -> ant (18)
remove implication ambient_bee (0) -> bee (82)
remove implication ambient_beetle (0) -> beetle (75)
remove implication ambient_butterfly (21) -> butterfly (103)
remove implication ambient_fly (0) -> dipteran (6)
remove implication ambient_firefly (18) -> firefly (69)
remove implication ambient_ladybug (0) -> ladybug (1)
remove implication ambient_moth (0) -> moth (89)
remove implication ambient_myriapod (0) -> myriapod (16)
remove implication ambient_bird (54) -> bird (3082)
remove implication ambient_owl (0) -> owl (468)

Reason:

1. Most of the time, we see very simplified version of the ambient_<specie>.

  • most of the time the level of detail is too low to really tell some shapes apart. e.g. are the ambient feys or butterflies?
  • Sometimes we just don't see them e.g. ambient fireflies are only flying wisp-like floating lights.

 

2. Users are much less likely to forget to tag the species of the characters, than forget to tag for ambient_<specie>.

  • E.i. *if* both specie and ambient_<specie> can apply, there's little change the that <specie> will have to be added by auto insertion of the implication.
  • Also gives more flexibility to the taggers to not include a specie tag if they deems that specie to not be present in the artwork.

 

3. e621 have don't have those links.

 

post #36645 post #112571 post #61160

EDIT: The bulk update request #411 (forum #3682) has been approved by @Jelloponies.

Updated by auto moderator