Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #122412
    321 536 3 E
    post #172808
    14 12 2 E

    What models are you using for inpainting? I use several ponyXL and Illustrious for 2d work, and there are several canine genitalia lora's that work well.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172834
    13 16 1 E
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    fluffbringer said:
    I don't know Balloon does it or what pipeline he uses but he is the closest i've seen to make them perfect with things like this:

    post #157334

    And this:

    post #159466

    and he has this one that i still consider the most photorealistic video i've seen of an anthro:

    post #165799

    I wonder how he got such impressive results TBH. That last one, even if the video is blurry you can see the light diffuse through her fur in the chest. It's not like all of yours are bad either some look really good like this one:

    post #148607

    But I get that video models can be trickier to get the desired result.

    The only way I have found to get it to be consistantly furry is to have the chest shown already in the frame. The first frame you see in the video is the base image I create, and there I can create furry chests. There are lots of models to work with in the image department for realistic.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172830
    21 19 1 E
    post #172813
    10 17 2 E

    grove_ellar said:
    He does a great job wearing it, he does a poor job hiding it.

    I think he is very much aware :3

  • |
  • 0
  • post #136392
    90 123 1 E

    How did i miss this till now? This kobold is awesome!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172832
    6 4 1 E

    Niiiiice :D No mneed for him to eat a ton pineapple then

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172813
    10 17 2 E
    post #111905
    162 312 4 E
    post #172809
    14 25 1 E
    post #149040
    121 204 3 E
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    zabern said:
    The biggest issue is that the models are trained on real human anatomy, as a majority of the data for photorealistic generation is real people.

    I don't know Balloon does it or what pipeline he uses but he is the closest i've seen to make them perfect with things like this:

    post #157334

    And this:

    post #159466

    and he has this one that i still consider the most photorealistic video i've seen of an anthro:

    post #165799

    I wonder how he got such impressive results TBH. That last one, even if the video is blurry you can see the light diffuse through her fur in the chest. It's not like all of yours are bad either some look really good like this one:

    post #148607

    But I get that video models can be trickier to get the desired result.

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172808
    14 12 2 E
    post #172807
    31 36 1 E
    post #156643
    128 207 2 E
    post #172794
    39 56 4 E
    post #172801
    10 15 1 Q

    Almost made me think of the shiba inu meme XD
    Big remake, so graphic, much wow

    Seriously tho this looks damn good 👍

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172799
    24 30 3 E
    post #172794
    39 56 4 E
    post #172794
    39 56 4 E

    inducive-thoughts said:
    Damn it's crazy the other 2 got deleted. I saw your other posts and they looked fine to me, I even favorited them. At least you're not discouraged, hope to see the animated version

    I agree, I thought they where fine. on close examination I agree with there notes on the teeth but you had to look close to notice anything. Like I noted, it dose encourage people to only post the best and to take there time with images, so I get it.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #122995
    286 431 7 E
    post #172793
    8 8 2 S
    post #172793
    8 8 2 S
    post #172794
    39 56 4 E

    Damn it's crazy the other 2 got deleted. I saw your other posts and they looked fine to me, I even favorited them. At least you're not discouraged, hope to see the animated version

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172787
    38 45 1 E
    post #172799
    24 30 3 E

    nocheamante said:
    Love your style with more natural sized bits and realism. Keep em coming

    Your wish is my command. And yes, part of why I'm doing this is just that, plenty of ridiculously huge bits around and not enough natural.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172651
    108 149 6 E
    post #172751
    53 88 3 E
    post #172799
    24 30 3 E
    post #172761
    16 18 1 E
    post #163079
    21 14 6 S
    post #131986
    275 414 5 E
    post #172791
    9 9 1 S

    Not playing deadlock, so no idea who this char really is. But they look fun

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172789
    32 45 1 Q
    post #172788
    3 2 1 S
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    zabern said:
    The biggest issue is that the models are trained on real human anatomy, as a majority of the data for photorealistic generation is real people.

    Then someone would need to find images or videos where this was done well and train the model on them. After all, there are quite a few images and videos here where it turned out well.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #168383
    23 10 2 Q

    Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats. The rats made me crazy. Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room...

  • |
  • 0
  • post #170766
    30 42 5 S
    post #172784
    19 22 1 E
    post #172617
    56 87 2 E
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    fluffbringer said:
    I think the only thing AI misses when it comes to photorealism is fur and boobs. For some reason, those areas often get left as bare skin with no fur, which makes them look off. For the anatomy to look natural, it needs consistent fur coverage and flow, but in a lot of these generations, the boobs just look like human boobs edited onto an otherwise photorealistic anthro body.

    My thoughts exactly. Furry tiddy best tiddy.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172779
    25 28 4 S

    gridanon said:
    Wow, very nice one TricksterFox! The expression here is excellent! Details like the sweat and fan blowing worked out well too. And the dialog is a nice touch. Well done!

    Thanks!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172764
    2 2 1 S
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    fluffbringer said:
    I think the only thing AI misses when it comes to photorealism is fur and boobs. For some reason, those areas often get left as bare skin with no fur, which makes them look off. For the anatomy to look natural, it needs consistent fur coverage and flow, but in a lot of these generations, the boobs just look like human boobs edited onto an otherwise photorealistic anthro body.

    The biggest issue is that the models are trained on real human anatomy, as a majority of the data for photorealistic generation is real people.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172779
    25 28 4 S

    Wow, very nice one TricksterFox! The expression here is excellent! Details like the sweat and fan blowing worked out well too. And the dialog is a nice touch. Well done!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172600
    93 114 6 E
    post #172776
    42 53 1 E
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    I think the only thing AI misses when it comes to photorealism is fur and boobs. For some reason, those areas often get left as bare skin with no fur, which makes them look off. For the anatomy to look natural, it needs consistent fur coverage and flow, but in a lot of these generations, the boobs just look like human boobs edited onto an otherwise photorealistic anthro body.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    Beautiful otter that has that super-nice fur and cute feral like face ❤️

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172768
    20 23 4 E

    Chinese but ye :P i got no idea how to add the director tag so couldn't do that as well

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172779
    25 28 4 S

    commander said:
    "The summer in my country is really too hot for me... But I must continue to delight you with new works! Thanks for the support!"

    Hang in there; things are bound to get more pleasant again...

    Yes, i think. Thanks!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172722
    63 79 2 Q
    post #172779
    25 28 4 S

    "The summer in my country is really too hot for me... But I must continue to delight you with new works! Thanks for the support!"

    Hang in there; things are bound to get more pleasant again...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #144138
    111 161 1 Q
    post #172674
    4 3 1 S
    post #172768
    20 23 4 E

    Someone get her one of those digital translators or at least the piece's director.

    "I think I'm turning Japanese, I think I'm turning Japanese, I really think so..."

  • |
  • 1
  • post #147914
    148 241 3 E

    I adore this beautiful bat and the grumpy blushing just makes here cuter 🥰

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172689
    20 39 2 E
    post #172705
    55 87 1 E
    post #172525
    26 10 12 E
    17 15 1 E

    谢谢你带来这件美好的事物。🤩

    "Thank you for this beauty 🤩"

  • |
  • 0
  • 17 27 1 E

    Translation:
    "An Encounter in the Bathroom"

    😍 Super hot shower scene!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172525
    26 10 12 E

    n_n said:
    I find these more funny / entertaining akin to the rl "Stoned Fox" or "Lion of Gripsholm Castle"

    If i was to guess why the dislikes it would be the realistic feral parts with the anthro parts sorta not forming the most realistic creature. This is a good way tho to avoid getting the post deleted because if it's TOO realistic it gets nuked.

    This is about as close as you can get wo overstepping it seems.

    Not sure if i can suggest anything as i am unable to make a proper stick figure myself, But maybe a more cartoony look with the same formula would work while still keeping the same level of realistic details?

    Tried that the mods took it down.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172768
    20 23 4 E
    post #172768
    20 23 4 E

    Translation:
    "What would you like to eat?"

    Thank you sweetie :) i would love some macarons and for dessert who knows 😘

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172766
    61 95 1 E
    post #172751
    53 88 3 E
    post #172729
    65 91 1 E
    post #172685
    69 93 5 E

    The heat coming off the grill alone should be pretty dang uncomfortable with his dong hovering over it. 😶

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172517
    63 116 1 E
    post #113605
    15 20 1 S
    post #29797
    7 4 1 S
    post #169151
    24 71 2 E
    post #51196
    38 56 1 E