Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #181518
    68 96 1 E
    post #184381
    22 125 2 E
    post #184347
    72 85 6 E
    post #184347
    72 85 6 E
    post #184381
    22 125 2 E
    post #184336
    61 91 2 E
    post #183885
    54 61 1 E

    - Девушка у вас всё хорошо? (Спрашивает мужчина, что мимо проходил).
    - Уже да... (Отвечает лиса трясясь от хочки).

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #183300
    50 63 1 E
    post #183948
    11 2 3 E

    У меня есть ощущение, что ИИ это не только рисует, но и грузит. При этом представления о прекрасном у него весьма специфические.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #170832
    71 107 1 E
    post #183769
    221 346 3 E

    deadcookie said:
    the wrinkles of cloth the moist fat red cock, and the strings of precum as lubricant... oh my god this is peak.

    It's one of the pics I spend the most time on, plus it also got really popular on Xitter for a week which was cool. Was fun to do because the base for this was an Anima gen that looked way different.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #183499
    140 206 1 E
    post #184158
    86 102 5 E

    На самом деле это офигенный концепт для секс-андроида, особенно если живот сделать мягким, как, собственно, человеческий живот.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184375
    26 22 2 E
    post #184291
    16 13 2 S
    post #184388
    27 29 3 E
    post #184385
    22 12 1 E

    I know what you're thinking, but I won't tell anyone~

    That dino chicken nuggets are the best chicken nuggets? I don’t mind if you tell.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184392
    6 1 1 S
    post #184375
    26 22 2 E
    post #184336
    61 91 2 E
    post #184388
    27 29 3 E
    post #184367
    37 42 3 E
    post #184388
    27 29 3 E
    post #184366
    31 35 2 E

    nerothunderfox said:
    Is it possible to see the last picture somewhere else?

    That would be awesome if so X3

    Unfortunately not. There was an imgbox, but it's gone now. Linking it would be against da rules anyway I assume, otherwise I could just post a catbox link in the description. Already asked about uploading it here with the babies censored like a japanese vagina, nope.

    I quite like the picture, but it's nothing impressive and you're not missing much that's not in the description. Kinda ruins the breast_envy conclusion tho

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184159
    44 78 1 E
    post #184366
    31 35 2 E
    post #184348
    38 23 21 S

    Wow did not expect such a spirited discussion! Please be respectful either way, I’m not trying to steer the conversation in any direction I just thought the comic was funny so I posted it here

  • |
  • 1
  • post #183644
    115 178 4 E

    underwolf69 said:
    More than anything else in this gen it's the motion of that TAIL that captivates. Was that something the generator did on its own or was it prompted?
    Because it's seductive as hell.

    Nope, i only really use grok imagine and kinda force it to make stuff like that. This gen took about 7-8ish tries, but some get through the moderation on the first go. I asked for:

    a sexy naked anthro female cat, sitting seductively on a couch inviting the viewer. +18, nsfw, furry animation style.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184348
    38 23 21 S

    A do wonder if the quality demands -not guidelines- are for future throwing up a paywall on part of the site.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184367
    37 42 3 E
    post #184291
    16 13 2 S
    post #184347
    72 85 6 E
    post #184367
    37 42 3 E

    If that is a shooting star, I think this guy's wish has already come true

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184360
    10 7 1 S
    post #183769
    221 346 3 E

    the wrinkles of cloth the moist fat red cock, and the strings of precum as lubricant... oh my god this is peak.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #183785
    22 11 2 S
    post #184362
    41 46 2 Q
    post #184362
    41 46 2 Q

    Enjoy youth while it lasts flora, You will get there soon enough :P

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184357
    36 49 1 Q
    post #184358
    29 25 3 S

    Awww that has to be the gen that has given me the biggest smile of the day. so wonderfully cute 🥰

  • |
  • 3
  • post #184348
    38 23 21 S

    lor7n said:
    I admit this was my mistake. I didn’t look carefully enough, and I only noticed it after the post had already been deleted. I apologize for that. However, the finger count mismatch is indeed an obvious issue. Though perhaps I shouldn’t be discussing deletion decisions here. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    It's no big deal; I'm not offended.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #100728
    107 297 2 E
    post #184183
    128 182 4 E
    post #184325
    45 52 1 Q
    post #184088
    107 155 1 E
    post #184068
    158 225 3 E

    Amazing. Love the outfit, the pose, and the character design. Hope to see more of them in the future!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184348
    38 23 21 S

    foxlover78982 said:
    I totally get where you're coming from. Recently, one of my images was removed, and one of the reasons given was that the character was missing a left ear. But the ear was actually there—it just blended in a bit with the color of the hair.
    But I'm too lazy to even argue about these things anymore.

    I admit this was my mistake. I didn’t look carefully enough, and I only noticed it after the post had already been deleted. I apologize for that. However, the finger count mismatch is indeed an obvious issue. Though perhaps I shouldn’t be discussing deletion decisions here. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184358
    29 25 3 S

    You've perfectly captured the canine in all it's natural grace and wonder.

    Excellent job! ^^

  • |
  • 4
  • post #184183
    128 182 4 E
    post #184290
    31 41 3 E
    post #184356
    56 54 1 E
    post #181956
    108 160 3 E
    post #184322
    66 73 2 E
    post #184348
    38 23 21 S

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    I totally get where you're coming from. Recently, one of my images was removed, and one of the reasons given was that the character was missing a left ear. But the ear was actually there—it just blended in a bit with the color of the hair.
    But I'm too lazy to even argue about these things anymore.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184358
    29 25 3 S
    post #182556
    63 84 1 Q
    post #184331
    34 43 2 Q
    post #184318
    106 145 3 E

    Why spend the energy chasing your prey when all you need to do is lay there looking gorgeous and delicious?

  • |
  • 2
  • post #184269
    36 56 6 E

    n_n said:
    All appreciated :P

    As are all the comments, compliments and inspirations from you and everyone who’s been keeping up with the comic so far! Cannot thank you enough! ❤️

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184290
    31 41 3 E
    post #184312
    82 105 1 E
    post #184289
    46 55 2 E
    post #184269
    36 56 6 E

    ducksiri said:
    I may be drawing it out, but I wanna make up for all the story and lore I put in the beginning!

    All appreciated :P

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184354
    44 63 1 E
    post #184195
    104 161 1 E
    post #184347
    72 85 6 E
    post #184348
    38 23 21 S

    lizzyroo said:
    I think we need something like e6ai2 where quality guidelines are bit more well relaxed, well thats just me.
    IE if eye is slightly messed up, thats fine, if bit blurry, thats fine.
    Where images aren't 100% perfect like it needs to be on e6ai.
    This is where e6ai2 comes in, where images aren't 100% perfect, but people want to post them. perhaps others can comment on it and give tips and helpful suggestion

    *this is also my bad apparently I did a Report and did Not read I was doing a Report. I am Truly Sorry.

    You should checkout the Discord then. We have a gen sharing channel where we don't enforce quality guidelines. We also have channels for getting feedback on WIPs and asking for help. Some users post more often-or even exclusively-on Discord.

  • |
  • 7
  • post #184348
    38 23 21 S
    post #184348
    38 23 21 S

    I appreciate the high quality standards, even if they are frustrating at times. I've had my fair share of submissions deleted, some several times for new errors one after another.
    See this image above and other cartoony images can be sloppy, aside from apparent anatomical anomalies. It's part of being cartoony. But in more realistic images, as I and many others try to make, a little slop is much more apparent and ruins the image. I don't know, it's a difficult line to draw. Maybe drop the demands by about 10%, then again maybe it's good with demands of perfection the way it is, even if it is frustrating.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184348
    38 23 21 S

    lizzyroo said:
    ok lets get the Magnifying glass out and see if it is a Pass.

    Better not or you'll the the jpg artifacts 💀
    (Which is easily fixable by 1:1 upscaling it and then saving it as a png)

  • |
  • 3
  • post #184335
    55 56 1 E
    post #184326
    39 45 1 E
    post #184348
    38 23 21 S

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    Inpainting is your friend. All these little sloppy bits can be easily corrected with a bit of inpainting. And, in my experience, the janitors are quite forgiving with backgrounds, because the ai is still not there yet. Unless it's a glaring problem like the horizon line not matching up on both sides of a character, which happened to me, and I fixed in about 10 minutes with some quick inpainting and the picture was validated.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #184300
    23 24 2 Q
    post #184348
    38 23 21 S

    drla said:
    Posts approved before the current quality guidelined are allowed to stay. Otherwise we'd have to pretty much delete everything from the first two years of the site...

    I think we need something like e6ai2 where quality guidelines are bit more well relaxed, well thats just me.
    IE if eye is slightly messed up, thats fine, if bit blurry, thats fine.
    Where images aren't 100% perfect like it needs to be on e6ai.
    This is where e6ai2 comes in, where images aren't 100% perfect, but people want to post them. perhaps others can comment on it and give tips and helpful suggestion

    *this is also my bad apparently I did a Report and did Not read I was doing a Report. I am Truly Sorry.

  • |
  • 1