Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #172808
    21 13 5 E

    billythebob30466192 said:
    I originally started out with Wild Safari 2.0 for inpainting, then Mess of a furry fusion, before staying with IffyMix V6.0. I did use a canine anus LoRA along the way, but it looked too big for my liking and the style didn't fit the surrounding texture. So I continued generating without it.

    I'm also noticing that there is a chance that the areas where inpainting doesn't happen changes in saturation, and sometimes lowers the quality in the background. Saturation changes seems to be more common when zooming up to just the area of the masked area (framed area gets saturation change, very noticeable when comparing the framed and non-framed area), which is annoying as it's how one gets a better quality inpainting output. Might be an issue with just Draw Things, but an issue is an issue nonetheless.

    I have had the best results sketching over what I want a part to look like then using inpainting to add detail. I use InvokeAI as I have found it has the best tools for inpainting and it as a UI that is like photoshop that I am used to working in. I use Indigo Furry Mix XL for 2d and realistic inpainting as it has a good undstading of furry anatomy.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172684
    98 130 1 E

    "Could you give me a hand full of books, not those books, the ones at the top." ;3

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172064
    168 205 12 E
    post #172377
    62 90 5 E
    post #172798
    6 1 2 S
    post #172840
    3 2 1 S
    post #172835
    21 15 1 E
    post #172808
    21 13 5 E

    zabern said:
    What models are you using for inpainting? I use several ponyXL and Illustrious for 2d work, and there are several canine genitalia lora's that work well.

    I originally started out with Wild Safari 2.0 for inpainting, then Mess of a furry fusion, before staying with IffyMix V6.0. I did use a canine anus LoRA along the way, but it looked too big for my liking and the style didn't fit the surrounding texture. So I continued generating without it.

    I'm also noticing that there is a chance that the areas where inpainting doesn't happen changes in saturation, and sometimes lowers the quality in the background. Saturation changes seems to be more common when zooming up to just the area of the masked area (framed area gets saturation change, very noticeable when comparing the framed and non-framed area), which is annoying as it's how one gets a better quality inpainting output. Might be an issue with just Draw Things, but an issue is an issue nonetheless.

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
  • post #172832
    10 6 2 E

    n_n said:
    Niiiiice :D No mneed for him to eat a ton pineapple then

    LOL!!! 🤣🤣🤣 Nah! I incorporated some real world attributes! The lore is as deep as a shot glass but thought it would be a nice touch!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172808
    21 13 5 E

    Happy Canada Day!
    Hope you have a great one, with plenty of good food, good company, and something unapologetically Canadian!🍁

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172794
    52 75 5 E
    post #172833
    21 23 1 E
    post #172790
    68 103 1 E
    post #172804
    22 27 1 E
    post #167944
    15 19 1 Q
    post #172811
    28 42 1 E
    post #172798
    6 1 2 S

    И ты, брат, познал к чему ведут её слова: "Милый, давай купим маленькую собачку. Не волнуйся, выгуливать её буду только я".

  • |
  • 0
  • post #122412
    321 536 3 E
    post #172808
    21 13 5 E

    What models are you using for inpainting? I use several ponyXL and Illustrious for 2d work, and there are several canine genitalia lora's that work well.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172834
    42 51 1 E
    post #172772
    17 20 7 E

    fluffbringer said:
    I don't know Balloon does it or what pipeline he uses but he is the closest i've seen to make them perfect with things like this:

    post #157334

    And this:

    post #159466

    and he has this one that i still consider the most photorealistic video i've seen of an anthro:

    post #165799

    I wonder how he got such impressive results TBH. That last one, even if the video is blurry you can see the light diffuse through her fur in the chest. It's not like all of yours are bad either some look really good like this one:

    post #148607

    But I get that video models can be trickier to get the desired result.

    The only way I have found to get it to be consistantly furry is to have the chest shown already in the frame. The first frame you see in the video is the base image I create, and there I can create furry chests. There are lots of models to work with in the image department for realistic.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172830
    43 42 1 E
    post #172813
    19 28 2 E
    post #136392
    90 126 1 E
    post #172832
    10 6 2 E
    post #172813
    19 28 2 E
    post #111905
    162 312 4 E
    post #172809
    18 29 1 E
    post #149040
    121 204 3 E
    post #172772
    17 20 7 E

    zabern said:
    The biggest issue is that the models are trained on real human anatomy, as a majority of the data for photorealistic generation is real people.

    I don't know Balloon does it or what pipeline he uses but he is the closest i've seen to make them perfect with things like this:

    post #157334

    And this:

    post #159466

    and he has this one that i still consider the most photorealistic video i've seen of an anthro:

    post #165799

    I wonder how he got such impressive results TBH. That last one, even if the video is blurry you can see the light diffuse through her fur in the chest. It's not like all of yours are bad either some look really good like this one:

    post #148607

    But I get that video models can be trickier to get the desired result.

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172808
    21 13 5 E
    post #172807
    41 52 1 E
    post #156643
    128 207 2 E
    post #172794
    52 75 5 E
    post #172801
    12 16 1 Q

    Almost made me think of the shiba inu meme XD
    Big remake, so graphic, much wow

    Seriously tho this looks damn good 👍

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172799
    31 35 3 E
    post #172794
    52 75 5 E
    post #172794
    52 75 5 E

    inducive-thoughts said:
    Damn it's crazy the other 2 got deleted. I saw your other posts and they looked fine to me, I even favorited them. At least you're not discouraged, hope to see the animated version

    I agree, I thought they where fine. on close examination I agree with there notes on the teeth but you had to look close to notice anything. Like I noted, it dose encourage people to only post the best and to take there time with images, so I get it.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #122995
    286 431 7 E
    post #172793
    11 9 2 S
    post #172793
    11 9 2 S
    post #172794
    52 75 5 E

    Damn it's crazy the other 2 got deleted. I saw your other posts and they looked fine to me, I even favorited them. At least you're not discouraged, hope to see the animated version

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172787
    51 65 1 E
    post #172799
    31 35 3 E

    nocheamante said:
    Love your style with more natural sized bits and realism. Keep em coming

    Your wish is my command. And yes, part of why I'm doing this is just that, plenty of ridiculously huge bits around and not enough natural.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #172651
    114 155 6 E
    post #172751
    60 93 3 E
    post #172799
    31 35 3 E
    post #172761
    17 20 1 E
    post #163079
    21 14 6 S
    post #131986
    275 414 5 E
    post #172791
    13 13 1 S

    Not playing deadlock, so no idea who this char really is. But they look fun

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172789
    41 55 1 Q
    post #172788
    4 2 1 S
    post #172772
    17 20 7 E

    zabern said:
    The biggest issue is that the models are trained on real human anatomy, as a majority of the data for photorealistic generation is real people.

    Then someone would need to find images or videos where this was done well and train the model on them. After all, there are quite a few images and videos here where it turned out well.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #168383
    23 10 2 Q

    Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats. The rats made me crazy. Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room...

  • |
  • 0
  • post #170766
    30 42 5 S
    post #172784
    22 23 1 E
    post #172617
    59 89 2 E
    post #172772
    17 20 7 E

    fluffbringer said:
    I think the only thing AI misses when it comes to photorealism is fur and boobs. For some reason, those areas often get left as bare skin with no fur, which makes them look off. For the anatomy to look natural, it needs consistent fur coverage and flow, but in a lot of these generations, the boobs just look like human boobs edited onto an otherwise photorealistic anthro body.

    My thoughts exactly. Furry tiddy best tiddy.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172779
    30 34 4 S

    gridanon said:
    Wow, very nice one TricksterFox! The expression here is excellent! Details like the sweat and fan blowing worked out well too. And the dialog is a nice touch. Well done!

    Thanks!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172764
    3 2 1 S
    post #172772
    17 20 7 E

    fluffbringer said:
    I think the only thing AI misses when it comes to photorealism is fur and boobs. For some reason, those areas often get left as bare skin with no fur, which makes them look off. For the anatomy to look natural, it needs consistent fur coverage and flow, but in a lot of these generations, the boobs just look like human boobs edited onto an otherwise photorealistic anthro body.

    The biggest issue is that the models are trained on real human anatomy, as a majority of the data for photorealistic generation is real people.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172779
    30 34 4 S

    Wow, very nice one TricksterFox! The expression here is excellent! Details like the sweat and fan blowing worked out well too. And the dialog is a nice touch. Well done!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172600
    96 117 6 E
    post #172776
    55 63 1 E
    post #172772
    17 20 7 E

    I think the only thing AI misses when it comes to photorealism is fur and boobs. For some reason, those areas often get left as bare skin with no fur, which makes them look off. For the anatomy to look natural, it needs consistent fur coverage and flow, but in a lot of these generations, the boobs just look like human boobs edited onto an otherwise photorealistic anthro body.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172772
    17 20 7 E

    Beautiful otter that has that super-nice fur and cute feral like face ❤️

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172768
    26 28 4 E

    Chinese but ye :P i got no idea how to add the director tag so couldn't do that as well

  • |
  • 1
  • post #172779
    30 34 4 S

    commander said:
    "The summer in my country is really too hot for me... But I must continue to delight you with new works! Thanks for the support!"

    Hang in there; things are bound to get more pleasant again...

    Yes, i think. Thanks!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #172722
    66 81 2 Q
    post #172779
    30 34 4 S

    "The summer in my country is really too hot for me... But I must continue to delight you with new works! Thanks for the support!"

    Hang in there; things are bound to get more pleasant again...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #144138
    111 160 1 Q
    post #172674
    5 3 1 S
    post #172768
    26 28 4 E

    Someone get her one of those digital translators or at least the piece's director.

    "I think I'm turning Japanese, I think I'm turning Japanese, I really think so..."

  • |
  • 1
  • post #147914
    148 241 3 E

    I adore this beautiful bat and the grumpy blushing just makes here cuter 🥰

  • |
  • 0