Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #138595
    296 495 3 E
    177 335 4 E
    post #138542
    191 274 3 E
    post #38789
    82 110 1 E
    post #138562
    54 79 1 E
    post #138084
    429 639 12 E
    post #138505
    116 180 6 Q
    110 175 1 E
    post #136252
    210 332 2 E
    post #138567
    149 188 5 E
    post #138573
    74 124 1 E
    109 180 1 E
    170 289 3 E
    post #138498
    234 364 1 Q
    post #128964
    100 166 1 E
    post #116054
    84 133 1 Q
    post #138513
    279 551 4 E
    post #138530
    119 136 3 S

    This is my favorite type of video. Just enough movement to bring a great picture to life, but avoiding the uncanny valley of trying to create movement that the ai isn't quite ready to handle

  • |
  • 2
  • post #138537
    107 185 3 E
    post #138543
    208 377 10 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    And natural selection would never create pupils that become heart shaped during mating. Very unscientific🧐

  • |
  • 6
  • post #138569
    173 292 2 Q
    63 90 2 E

    Could you repost with a fix? I thought it was perfect and was just about to save it.

  • |
  • 0
  • 238 379 2 E

    A great view. truly one of the best ways of presenting.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138569
    173 292 2 Q
    post #124622
    120 175 1 E
    post #138576
    27 37 2 Q
    post #138576
    27 37 2 Q
    post #138545
    103 140 1 Q
    post #121802
    11 12 2 E
    post #138397
    139 231 5 E
    post #138539
    234 433 1 E
    post #37055
    35 5 6 Q
    post #118481
    244 430 2 E
    post #133586
    175 281 1 E
    post #118353
    88 158 1 E
    post #138519
    301 538 2 E
    post #138489
    186 306 4 E
    post #138513
    279 551 4 E
    post #138365
    138 244 3 E
    post #138536
    276 454 1 Q
    post #138516
    65 69 5 Q
    post #138568
    104 194 1 E
    post #138519
    301 538 2 E
    post #135125
    89 93 7 Q

    This is very exciting! I'm glad you are back with more lovely otters <3 Good to see you again my friend

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138040
    41 43 1 S
    post #138071
    600 1.2k 13 E
    18 37 1 E
    post #138543
    208 377 10 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    What's even the point of pointing out inconsistencies with real life when you are talking about fictional animals..? Especially when said animal has a humanoid pussy in the first place. I honestly fail to understand.

  • |
  • 11
  • post #138549
    179 339 1 E
    post #130813
    210 333 1 E
    post #138510
    165 255 1 E
    post #138543
    208 377 10 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    Provide examples! 😍

  • |
  • 8
  • post #138499
    267 435 4 E
    post #138468
    125 189 2 Q
    post #138486
    106 165 2 E
    post #138504
    85 103 1 Q
    post #138505
    116 180 6 Q
    post #138466
    171 321 1 E
    post #135941
    175 310 2 E

    That's perfect. If it's not too much trouble, what do you use to generate it? It seems to me you only use a template, that's perfect.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138254
    134 213 3 E
    post #138541
    111 208 2 E
    post #136748
    103 101 12 S

    You have just generated the counterpart to the Mona Lisa's smile - furry style.

    I'll be coming back here anytime I feel down. That smile is heartwarming AF.
    Apologies if I'm being a creep here right now. :<

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #136741
    113 163 6 Q

    That level of realism and detailed fur/hair is... "stunning" wouldn't begin to describe it.
    And not just that. The detail on every rose, the paws, the irregularity of the fur... it's beyond anything i have seen generated.

    Makes me want to stop generating and posting anything really :x

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138431
    61 115 1 E
    post #138489
    186 306 4 E
    post #138542
    191 274 3 E
    238 379 2 E
    37 48 5 E

    tsuruchi said:
    Hunh. Would you believe me if I told you I didn't even pay attention to that at all? I do use negative prompts, "Signature, watermark, logo, patreon, name", but even doing that they still pop in and I don't catch them. Thanks for the heads up.
    I'll scrutinize and post another one, I'm just kinda "testing the waters" for uploading images.

    Heh, yeah I believe it. It's easy to miss little errors, and they're really strict about it here, so you'd be well advised to really scrutinize your stuff with a fine-tooth comb. Extra fingers/toes, weird-looking fingers or uneven numbers of them, misshapen eyes or even nostrils, JPG compression, AI signatures... they're all grounds for merciless deletion. 😮

    Well, like raiinbow dash pointed out, you can always remove this one by hand or crop it out, that's easy enough. Then you can just reupload it and it should pass, I think.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #137869
    43 50 1 E
    post #138518
    31 29 1 S
    24 44 2 E
    post #106147
    99 180 1 E
    post #57537
    89 154 3 Q
    post #137882
    122 139 9 E

    zeroabsolute said:
    Not exactly tattoos, but fur patterns are obtained by carefully shortening the hair, revealing the darker colored fur unerneath, or by cutting the hair altogether exposing the pale skin for contrast. Fur-art on camels is a thing for real.

    Interesting! Didn't know that. Yeah I could see some beastkin doing that practice too, then.
    The magical chromashift as pictured is a more permanent cosmetic solution, for the vixen-on-the-go - so much leg spreading to do, no time for tedious fur vanity!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138537
    107 185 3 E