Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #138519
    301 538 2 E
    post #135125
    89 93 7 Q

    This is very exciting! I'm glad you are back with more lovely otters <3 Good to see you again my friend

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138040
    41 43 1 S
    post #138071
    600 1.2k 13 E
    18 37 1 E
    post #138543
    208 377 10 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    What's even the point of pointing out inconsistencies with real life when you are talking about fictional animals..? Especially when said animal has a humanoid pussy in the first place. I honestly fail to understand.

  • |
  • 11
  • post #138549
    179 339 1 E
    post #130813
    210 333 1 E
    post #138510
    165 255 1 E
    post #138543
    208 377 10 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    Provide examples! 😍

  • |
  • 8
  • post #138499
    267 435 4 E
    post #138468
    125 189 2 Q
    post #138486
    106 165 2 E
    post #138504
    85 103 1 Q
    post #138505
    116 180 6 Q
    post #138466
    171 321 1 E
    post #135941
    175 309 2 E

    That's perfect. If it's not too much trouble, what do you use to generate it? It seems to me you only use a template, that's perfect.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138254
    133 212 3 E
    post #138541
    111 208 2 E
    post #136748
    103 101 12 S

    You have just generated the counterpart to the Mona Lisa's smile - furry style.

    I'll be coming back here anytime I feel down. That smile is heartwarming AF.
    Apologies if I'm being a creep here right now. :<

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #136741
    113 163 6 Q

    That level of realism and detailed fur/hair is... "stunning" wouldn't begin to describe it.
    And not just that. The detail on every rose, the paws, the irregularity of the fur... it's beyond anything i have seen generated.

    Makes me want to stop generating and posting anything really :x

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138431
    61 115 1 E
    post #138489
    186 306 4 E
    post #138542
    191 274 3 E
    238 379 2 E
    37 48 5 E

    tsuruchi said:
    Hunh. Would you believe me if I told you I didn't even pay attention to that at all? I do use negative prompts, "Signature, watermark, logo, patreon, name", but even doing that they still pop in and I don't catch them. Thanks for the heads up.
    I'll scrutinize and post another one, I'm just kinda "testing the waters" for uploading images.

    Heh, yeah I believe it. It's easy to miss little errors, and they're really strict about it here, so you'd be well advised to really scrutinize your stuff with a fine-tooth comb. Extra fingers/toes, weird-looking fingers or uneven numbers of them, misshapen eyes or even nostrils, JPG compression, AI signatures... they're all grounds for merciless deletion. 😮

    Well, like raiinbow dash pointed out, you can always remove this one by hand or crop it out, that's easy enough. Then you can just reupload it and it should pass, I think.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #137869
    43 50 1 E
    post #138518
    31 29 1 S
    24 44 2 E
    post #106147
    99 180 1 E
    post #57537
    89 154 3 Q
    post #137882
    122 139 9 E

    zeroabsolute said:
    Not exactly tattoos, but fur patterns are obtained by carefully shortening the hair, revealing the darker colored fur unerneath, or by cutting the hair altogether exposing the pale skin for contrast. Fur-art on camels is a thing for real.

    Interesting! Didn't know that. Yeah I could see some beastkin doing that practice too, then.
    The magical chromashift as pictured is a more permanent cosmetic solution, for the vixen-on-the-go - so much leg spreading to do, no time for tedious fur vanity!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138537
    107 185 3 E
    post #138084
    429 639 12 E

    zeroabsolute said:
    If there is one thing I learned about terraraptor's art, it's you can't have too many cats in one picture.

    This was originally going to be a pt II for post #136137 (all the same species + a jaguar), and they were gonna be plastered in cum, an after_sex scene. But sorta changed my mind and went another direction with it mid-way.

    juan-doe said:
    anatomically_correct_pussy would have made this peak. still quite enticing.

    Yeah I almost always go the anatomically correct route except for felines. Too small and subtle, not really much to look at IMO, you would barely see much in this composition. Maybe if it were a single closeup.

  • |
  • 2
  • 42 67 1 E
    post #138277
    426 804 3 E
    post #138537
    107 185 3 E
    post #138293
    35 61 29 S

    rawdog said:
    Did not expect pro-life arguments in an e6 comment section. A surprise for sure, but a welcome one

    denying people human rights is a welcome one? so how do you force someone to give birth and raise a child they don't want to have

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138456
    42 64 2 E

    angelofox said:
    "It's because of Ose, Joe!"

    I swear to God if I see a picture of Joe's dragonsona getting topped by Ose I'm going to lose it

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138533
    115 153 3 E
    post #138307
    303 435 8 E

    At this point I just want to know some midria insults, because saying "fuck you" to this lizard would probably miss the point.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #138084
    429 639 12 E

    juan-doe said:
    anatomically_correct_pussy would have made this peak. still quite enticing.
    gonna have to dock points for 2 lionesses and 0 leopards, though ;)

    Gonna have to give those points back because there IS a snow leopard there, and lionesses are based af.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138084
    429 639 12 E

    If there is one thing I learned about terraraptor's art, it's you can't have too many cats in one picture.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #118604
    74 119 1 E
    post #133507
    167 258 3 E
    post #137882
    122 139 9 E

    Not exactly tattoos, but fur patterns are obtained by carefully shortening the hair, revealing the darker colored fur unerneath, or by cutting the hair altogether exposing the pale skin for contrast. Fur-art on camels is a thing for real.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138401
    231 422 2 E
    119 203 1 E
    70 111 2 E
    post #138345
    104 125 2 Q
    173 305 1 E
    post #138525
    96 135 1 E

    OMG I love the way her claw shape came out on this one. Very catlike and sharper that the previous and her fur texture is crazy. Excellent gen. The black claws do give a nice contrast. She's so pretty.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #138530
    119 136 3 S
    post #138499
    267 435 4 E

    I know I'm probably in the minority, but thank you SO much for giving them humanoid dicks. It's a rare treat.

  • |
  • 12
  • 174 283 3 E
    post #138397
    139 231 5 E
    post #138516
    65 69 5 Q
    post #138516
    65 69 5 Q
    114 162 5 Q

    b1-rp_cogs said:
    I'm guessing they're Epic's. I hope he's ready to become a father-brother
    Might as well knock up his sister and grandmother, too. Have one big happy inbred family

    Now I want to see a picture of sis, mom, and grandma all pointing their positive tests at Epic while he's sweating nervously. Would be pretty funny.

    Updated

  • |
  • 5
  • post #138414
    127 190 1 E
    post #138516
    65 69 5 Q

    That's not ai, you just took a screenshot of the game after installing 3000 texture mods

  • |
  • 8
  • 37 48 5 E

    hammapajamma said:
    Unfortunately, I can already tell you now that it won't because of the 'signature' in the corner. :(

    Hunh. Would you believe me if I told you I didn't even pay attention to that at all? I do use negative prompts, "Signature, watermark, logo, patreon, name", but even doing that they still pop in and I don't catch them. Thanks for the heads up.
    I'll scrutinize and post another one, I'm just kinda "testing the waters" for uploading images.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138505
    116 180 6 Q

    Ok. I'm in awe of how good and smooth this looks.
    And she's cute and sexy too! So that's double thumbs up!

  • |
  • 1
  • 37 48 5 E

    hammapajamma said:
    Unfortunately, I can already tell you now that it won't because of the 'signature' in the corner. :(

    You can either attempt to remove the signature or just crop the image maybe to give better chances.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #134669
    151 249 1 E
    post #138333
    245 434 3 E

    beerwolf said:
    Why are you tagging literally EVERY deer image with blatant equine bits as "cervine" along with clitoral winking when clearly there ain't..?

    Think I've corrected a couple dozen of such uploads of yours...

    sorry.....
    it was not my intention......
    thank you for your work.......
    I just copied the tags from my previous images that had certain similarities.........
    ;-;

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138450
    198 305 2 E
    114 162 5 Q
    0 4 1 E
    37 48 5 E

    Hope this passes muster for a good post.

    Unfortunately, I can already tell you now that it won't because of the 'signature' in the corner. :(

  • |
  • 1
  • post #132684
    204 329 2 E
    post #138413
    128 208 3 E
    post #138445
    236 342 5 E
    post #138508
    33 66 1 E
    post #138505
    116 180 6 Q

    3rfl_she-her said:
    She's frustrated she can't see it either

    That could be a niche needing to be filled, no pun intended. But a tit periscope for busty gals to check out their bush.

  • |
  • 2