Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #126139
    178 234 1 Q
    post #126055
    107 189 11 E

    raif said:
    No, if you don't like it, you can block me so that you don't see this content.

    Well someone clearly had their shit stolen.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #126138
    64 79 2 Q

    Love her. An old Jennie still going up on stage and showing off. Definitely need to see more of her.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #123728
    113 170 3 Q
    post #126008
    52 106 7 E

    ironhorse said:
    I completely understand e6ai wanting to avoid legal entanglements.... on the other hand, the nature of AI generated images can create these images more precisely. I believe this is why e6ai was spun off of e621 .. AI images got deleted from e621. As AI evolves it's not unrealistic to expect images with this "photorealistic" quality being posted. I thought that's why this site was created. It would be nice if an alternative to deleting these images could be found. Maybe a 24, 48, or 72 hour warning before deletion so downloading is possible for those that want to save the image. Oh well, ,,,,, that's my 2 cents....

    fyi, not even the uploader gets a warning.
    there isn't even a link to see your deleted content.
    you just have to know that https://e6ai.net/posts?tags=user:Dirtyfinger+status:deleted shows your deleted stuff.

    jelloponies said:
    If you'd like to discuss the specifics of the rule feel free to reach out to me in dmail or on discord.
    If you think a post was removed unjustly there's also procedures for that.

    I am sure you have some sort of reasons.
    It would be nice if you had posted your rules or reasons in the Uploading Guidelines or Avoid Posting or e621:rules

    That photorealistic human face rule is completely absent for one.

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
  • post #59405
    116 171 1 E
    post #125761
    147 228 1 E

    Saphira and Firren? or Saphira and thorn? And Eragon?

    At least that is what I am thinking because of the trend of the last few pictures with Saphira and this generation artist

  • |
  • 2
  • post #126055
    107 189 11 E
    post #126043
    108 143 2 E
    post #126124
    354 575 3 E
    post #125976
    65 119 1 E
    post #125916
    69 111 4 E
    post #126026
    122 223 4 E
    post #126025
    70 119 2 E
    post #126008
    52 106 7 E

    I completely understand e6ai wanting to avoid legal entanglements.... on the other hand, the nature of AI generated images can create these images more precisely. I believe this is why e6ai was spun off of e621 .. AI images got deleted from e621. As AI evolves it's not unrealistic to expect images with this "photorealistic" quality being posted. I thought that's why this site was created. It would be nice if an alternative to deleting these images could be found. Maybe a 24, 48, or 72 hour warning before deletion so downloading is possible for those that want to save the image. Oh well, ,,,,, that's my 2 cents....

  • |
  • 0
  • post #126108
    12 15 2 S
    post #126087
    336 578 3 E
    post #126108
    12 15 2 S

    I would have found that even better with white instead of gray at the back of the eye, but otherwise I like it

  • |
  • 1
  • 51 92 3 E
    post #126099
    64 132 1 E
    post #126098
    167 301 1 E
    post #126091
    369 637 3 E
    post #126026
    122 223 4 E
    post #126025
    70 119 2 E
    post #126026
    122 223 4 E
    post #126094
    256 406 1 E

    all that faith and praying paid off. she turned into a sexy canine goddess. bit of an adjustment phase though....

  • |
  • 3
  • post #124711
    431 796 5 E
    post #126008
    52 106 7 E

    dirtyfinger said:
    Honestly, legal reasons?
    I get deepfake rules, but this face was obviously generated directly from the ancient Peter Pan cartoon.

    If you'd like to discuss the specifics of the rule feel free to reach out to me in dmail or on discord.
    If you think a post was removed unjustly there's also procedures for that.

  • |
  • -5
  • post #122714
    82 124 2 E
    post #126008
    52 106 7 E

    jelloponies said:
    Your malicious compliance gave me a good laugh! +1

    Honestly, legal reasons?
    I get deepfake rules, but this face was obviously generated directly from the ancient Peter Pan cartoon.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #125966
    196 276 5 Q

    delken said:
    I can see where you're getting your inspiration from lmao

    yep, learning from the best! :)

  • |
  • 3
  • post #126008
    52 106 7 E
    post #125516
    310 504 2 E

    I must be doing something wrong because I can NEVER get this sort of angle with a fortune cookie.
    This?
    This is awesome!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #123679
    76 108 2 E
    post #115607
    205 348 7 E
    post #125966
    196 276 5 Q
    post #126056
    82 115 1 E

    The right hand is strangely positioned. It seems to go straight down from the shoulder, but at the same time it is located next to the left.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125517
    150 200 3 Q
    post #126057
    145 178 3 Q
    post #124315
    192 348 1 E
    post #125970
    112 149 2 Q
    post #125978
    191 323 3 E
    post #126083
    94 154 2 E
    post #125991
    508 827 7 E
    post #126082
    267 511 2 E

    I wish Femboy Arcanines were real and not fake.

    Yes it's a worthless plead to the void but damn do I mean it! I'm still waiting for the geek that's gonna make a VR that converts jpegs into entire experiences.

    Updated

  • |
  • 6
  • post #124634
    123 187 1 Q
    post #121743
    194 305 6 E
    post #125725
    89 131 1 Q

    I love the Imagination Theory. Unintentionally showing just enough to become aroused by what you have yet to see.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #125630
    87 157 1 E
    post #125553
    394 674 1 E
    post #107964
    78 102 3 E

    More like a female Gen Shishio from the anime Kekkaishi. If you haven't seen the show it's worth it to watch. Also, would like to see more of her.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #126081
    97 164 1 E
    post #126083
    94 154 2 E
    post #125785
    59 86 4 S
    post #125872
    164 255 2 E

    Wow,this might be my favorite pic of the day. She absolutely pops off the page with her bright colors and unique character design

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125874
    212 390 3 E
    post #126019
    255 421 1 E
    post #126008
    52 106 7 E

    ironhorse said:
    what fault was found with the image without the bucket ????

    This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

    [DELETION] photorealistic human depictions are prohibited for legal reasons (unless the face is hidden) - ceti - about 21 hours ago

  • |
  • 2
  • post #92213
    327 532 1 E

    "Thank you for purchasing the "How to Lay Awkwardly" comprehensive instructional video on VHS..."

  • |
  • 0
  • 8 15 1 E

    I'm curious: why is this image marked as "intersex"? There's nothing in the actual show or in this image to indicate a need or objective reason for that tag.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #126079
    137 242 1 E
    post #92017
    182 288 4 E
    post #124393
    157 235 2 E
    post #126003
    84 71 6 S
    post #125685
    114 183 2 E
    post #125988
    75 132 1 E
    post #124402
    135 189 3 S
    post #126002
    169 251 2 Q
    post #125703
    256 407 4 E
    post #126026
    122 223 4 E
    post #125901
    142 197 4 E

    p1xel~d0g said:
    If this was cloaca/slit sex, it would be great.

    there's plenty of feminine submissive arts, let us get a few "bones" :p

  • |
  • 0
  • post #122578
    504 805 7 E
    post #123237
    149 222 7 E
    post #37072
    111 179 2 E
    post #126055
    107 189 11 E