Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #121608
    104 174 1 E
    post #121845
    129 232 1 E
    post #121833
    70 109 1 E
    post #121850
    367 584 3 E
    post #121719
    209 331 2 E
    post #121652
    177 293 1 E
    post #58517
    150 254 1 E
    post #59955
    163 308 2 E
    post #95480
    229 359 3 E

    Boltz

    Member

    Now I understand why all the dogs wanted Georgette... look at this beauty

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #100256
    171 248 2 E
    post #121851
    342 566 4 E
    post #121733
    89 129 1 S
    post #121817
    125 189 1 S
    post #121851
    342 566 4 E
    post #121777
    177 287 1 E
    post #121754
    191 370 1 E
    post #121766
    191 311 1 E
    post #121703
    170 325 1 E
    post #121747
    277 447 5 E
    post #111757
    90 150 2 E
    post #121676
    195 327 1 E
    post #62895
    56 103 2 E
    post #121855
    104 128 2 S
    post #121846
    76 113 1 S

    Nagiman90

    Member

    She is such a cutie. Nerdy glasses, shy attitude, tiny tits, she's just the perfect little nerdy girl next door.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #118494
    34 43 4 E
    post #121855
    104 128 2 S
    post #121662
    51 57 1 Q
    post #121841
    115 187 2 E

    Vargrklaw

    Member

    ironhorse said:
    this is I believe the third time these were re-posted ... wondering what the problem is with these images ... just curious

    Anomalies and watermark/signatures that I missed and cleaned up.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #121844
    64 104 1 Q
    post #121841
    115 187 2 E

    IRONHORSE

    Member

    this is I believe the third time these were re-posted ... wondering what the problem is with these images ... just curious

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #121762
    214 362 2 E
    109 151 2 E
    post #121701
    13 9 2 S
    post #121668
    87 127 2 Q
    post #119934
    103 99 7 Q
    post #121802
    11 12 2 E
    post #121710
    66 67 2 S
    post #121759
    172 272 3 E
    post #121798
    14 29 1 E

    jons

    Member

    Look, I think they were onto something. I'd have liked to see more of this Snivy

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #121751
    140 254 1 E
    post #121673
    292 497 1 E
    post #121210
    110 176 1 E
    post #121532
    48 66 1 Q

    BoShamp95

    Member

    Man, I came across her bad time in my life cause some problems with her story. I didn’t see the warnings at the beginning of the video so my fault but yeah.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #121688
    230 406 1 E
    post #121745
    110 183 3 Q
    post #121740
    156 234 4 E
    post #121583
    191 327 3 E

    Zaddha

    Member

    chaos475 said:
    Your style is something very unique. I adore each and every one of your generations. Please - keep them coming!

    This is the artist snowskau's style, not mine!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #121743
    190 299 6 E

    Namsi

    Member

    Dang, thats good!
    Can't afford a card to get any video diffusion model running :(

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #121763
    78 136 3 E
    post #121731
    250 365 7 E

    nosuitnosoul

    Member

    zerphy said:
    my bad, I think it should work now

    I really hope this doesn't get deleted for realism but even if it does just more reason to follow your telegram! Please keep up the great realistic and less-realistic work!

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #121745
    110 183 3 Q
    4 1 1 E
    post #121747
    277 447 5 E

    ClF3

    Member

    mikubraver said:
    Thank god that the wings only show Silhouettes one way. ;3

    Well, can't exactly show a silhouette of someone when there's no light source to cast their shadow in that direction.

    Although at the angle of the only know source of illumination here, one can argue that their shadow shouldn't reach unless they were right up against the wing.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #121759
    172 272 3 E
    post #121503
    95 159 2 Q
    post #110412
    33 46 2 Q
    post #121731
    250 365 7 E
    post #121745
    110 183 3 Q
    102 182 1 E
    post #121731
    250 365 7 E
    post #121713
    532 954 4 E
    post #121731
    250 365 7 E
    post #121655
    421 692 8 E

    Meh6

    Member

    Wow, this is amazing! If you don't mind me asking, what model did you use for this? Did you also use some additional loras, embeddings or styles? I would love to try this for myself

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #121740
    156 234 4 E
    post #121747
    277 447 5 E
    post #121722
    229 420 4 E

    WhereWolf

    Member

    Well fortunately I work from home. So I drop everything and *run* to the bedroom to help my hot bunny gf who is clearly in dis-dress. :P

  • |
  • 3
    •
    109 151 2 E

    badwolf1

    Member

    I would not mistake this for IRL, but I suppose some dumb people could.

  • |
  • 7
    •
    post #121665
    39 51 2 S

    crashbandit

    Member

    heavengosthh said:
    Hello,
    might I ask if you have an automated way to generate the generation metadata present in the description ?

    It is automated. ComfyUI saves the workflow metadata with the file. My actual setup is a bit more complicated than this, but basically I have a process which reads the metadata attached to the image and generates the description. It also populates some of the tags.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #121731
    250 365 7 E
    post #121668
    87 127 2 Q
    post #121128
    18 25 1 E
    post #121195
    17 27 2 E
    post #121609
    23 37 2 E
    post #121701
    13 9 2 S
    post #121665
    39 51 2 S

    heavengosthh

    Member

    Hello,
    might I ask if you have an automated way to generate the generation metadata present in the description ?

  • |
  • 0
    •