Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #44187
    74 110 1 E
    post #52688
    102 153 1 E
    post #44186
    81 130 1 E
    post #61030
    61 100 1 E
    post #55660
    59 97 3 E
    post #108387
    311 540 4 E
    post #66565
    134 249 2 E
    post #114126
    137 229 2 Q
    post #60765
    251 428 2 E
    post #99830
    79 115 5 Q
    post #68948
    94 141 1 E
    post #72418
    198 321 1 E
    post #63893
    81 123 2 E
    post #107513
    90 141 1 Q
    post #49371
    47 73 1 E
    post #57333
    145 203 3 E
    82 136 1 Q
    post #112943
    168 253 2 E
    post #116148
    120 151 4 Q
    post #112918
    112 187 2 E
    post #65683
    37 58 1 E
    post #116061
    287 439 12 E

    yliaster said:

    ahahaha no, let's not conflate things that aren't really related. If you have at least one eye and enough GPU horsepower to kill god then you can use genAI. Beyond that you just dump it into an image editor, liquefy/smudge out dumb stuff, and pull the lever. Pull the lever. Pull the lever. Until you get what you want.

    Well, you're definitely producing some quality art regardless of the method so thank you for that.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #76356
    57 99 2 E
    post #80565
    46 52 1 Q
    post #116035
    221 359 1 E
    post #60531
    68 93 1 Q
    post #45201
    75 123 1 S
    post #44249
    116 208 1 E
    post #8092
    80 133 1 E
    post #116137
    82 103 2 Q
    post #47433
    40 47 1 E
    post #107039
    138 255 1 E
    post #113337
    107 198 1 E
    post #116196
    19 34 1 E
    post #115593
    173 331 5 E
    post #116177
    291 548 4 E
    post #116124
    212 309 2 Q

    She's absolutely beautiful! Could you please share the prompt and settings you used? I'd love to try and create something similar.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #114976
    230 371 3 E

    gobai said:
    yeah sadly, i'm also not really happy with the speed.
    But for a first experiment it came out good.

    Amp playback speed

  • |
  • 0
  • post #116106
    59 92 1 E
    post #116015
    177 232 6 E
    post #116181
    541 930 4 E
    post #115970
    143 230 2 E
    post #116061
    287 439 12 E
    post #116070
    274 346 12 Q
    post #116124
    212 309 2 Q
    84 110 4 E
    84 110 4 E
    post #116160
    278 475 2 E
    post #86892
    120 198 1 E
    post #116022
    161 313 1 E
    post #116070
    274 346 12 Q
    post #115885
    68 93 6 E

    kingk said:
    I think this one's a lot better than the other horse, personally. That one looked purely human apart from the head, feet and tail.

    Yup, her coloration was nicer, more equine contrast, but it was that lack of fur that diminished the picture.
    I still wish the model was more more feral waist down. Equines don't need any improvement in that department.

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
  • post #114172
    56 48 2 Q
    post #86559
    101 171 1 E
    post #116061
    287 439 12 E

    neta said:
    Any more information about the director?

    it me

    fluffscaler said:
    You should upload the cross section version of this too, that one was peak

    I would/will but I realized there's an oopsie fuckie with the anatomy that I gotta fix first

    ilmpbx said:
    This is the sort of thing that can happen when a high cal artist gets their hands on an AI toolset.

    ahahaha no, let's not conflate things that aren't really related. If you have at least one eye and enough GPU horsepower to kill god then you can use genAI. Beyond that you just dump it into an image editor, liquefy/smudge out dumb stuff, and pull the lever. Pull the lever. Pull the lever. Until you get what you want.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #27449
    29 62 7 Q
    post #115734
    157 276 2 E
    post #115965
    97 130 1 Q

    He knows he's got legs. Those stockings really show off how shapely they are, lol.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #115937
    120 191 6 Q

    plapenjoyer said:
    Oops! If I had any reading comprehension my original comment would have said "he is not a grower" :c

    I've got a pretty big image set lined up! Refining them into an acceptable quality just takes a little time :D

    Lol, it's fine, I got what you meant. ^_^ Based on the recent images, he's not allowed to be a grower XD

  • |
  • 2
  • post #116117
    66 117 1 E
    post #116161
    263 465 3 E
    54 70 1 E
    84 110 4 E
    post #116160
    278 475 2 E
    post #114691
    44 44 4 S
    post #116007
    129 200 4 E
    post #116154
    223 345 1 E
    post #116032
    56 73 5 E
    post #116146
    73 93 1 Q
    post #116015
    177 232 6 E
    post #116148
    120 151 4 Q
    79 122 1 E
    post #110974
    200 332 5 E

    velric_olrand said:
    In my humble opinion, this should be e6ai’s mascot.

    I upvoted this and after only one other upvoted it I got to say that this comment did not get enough love.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #113776
    216 366 2 E

    "collaborative_sex".... Might just be the best tag on the site...

    These two seriously give me the feels.

  • |
  • 0
  • 84 110 4 E

    More her please!

    Love the border collie girls of this quality...

    Sequences like this also magnify the sexy.

  • |
  • 2