Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #114459
    47 98 1 E
    post #114488
    173 258 9 E
    post #114441
    99 186 1 E

    I saw when this got removed for having 3 fingers. Smh. I see alot of bad ai stuff here and it was weird to see the first one get removed

  • |
  • 1
  • post #85787
    390 665 7 E

    I'm surprised this made it here. The pussy stroke magically adds another finger.

    horsefucker5 said:
    Maybe the AI doesn't recognize animal pussy, because this is uncensored AF

    Exactly this. I ran a few things and as long as it wasn't something vanilla porn-like, it didn't detect it as anything bad. The detection model was created using far too innocent a dataset.
    Hyena with plump, black labia? Sure.
    A bear in panties? NOPE!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #113312
    84 83 5 E
    post #113696
    81 136 4 E
    post #114488
    173 258 9 E

    motelsaint said:
    They aren't brothers through blood, purely through their bond together. Brothers from another mother basically.

    Ahh, so brothers in the spiritual sense, gotcha.
    Still, I love 'em. They're great 💜

  • |
  • 2
  • post #114488
    173 258 9 E

    sergalbutt said:

    Fuck yes


    Also, I do have to wonder: is this an actual incest or a technical incest situation?

    Not that I'm bothered either way, I just want to understand your adorable characters more 💜 (and for tag reasons :P)

    They aren't brothers through blood, purely through their bond together. Brothers from another mother basically.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #114489
    122 172 2 Q
    post #114488
    173 258 9 E

    Fuck yes


    Also, I do have to wonder: is this an actual incest or a technical incest situation?

    Not that I'm bothered either way, I just want to understand your adorable characters more 💜 (and for tag reasons :P)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #114363
    50 108 1 E
    post #114474
    54 83 2 E
    post #114371
    66 130 4 E

    caballus_j said:
    I think the telegram channel link doesn't work anymore.
    Is there a new chat?

    The Telegram channel link is a permalink so it should never not work.

    I suggest checking the settings in the app
    Settings -> Chat Settings -> Show 18+ Content
    And if you can't do it in the app, if you log in via a web browser, you can enable it there and that setting carries over to the app.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #114424
    43 45 1 S
    post #114446
    75 107 1 E
    post #114444
    413 701 4 E
    post #114411
    179 283 2 E
    post #114234
    124 232 1 E
    post #114443
    145 235 2 E
    16 16 1 Q
    post #114248
    173 309 4 E
    post #98512
    281 479 5 E

    kemowolf said:
    One of these days, male creators will learn you can't pierce the cervix with a dick, and if you did, you would cause permanent damage to the woman.

    And yet we can't stop seeing furry art with the woman in rapture with an internal to show her cervix being punctured.

    Yes
    But some kinds of canines can enter the tip of their urethra into the cervix. But not like on the art.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114269
    238 393 1 E
    post #114278
    145 231 2 E
    22 24 1 S
    post #109456
    65 100 13 E
    post #114386
    91 138 1 E
    post #113753
    184 252 3 E

    fuck yes. Eyes looks some creepy, but its already so good

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114391
    107 181 1 E

    Don't know if I'm being drawn in by her behind or her eyes. ;3

    Just something about green glowing eyes really pull you in.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #114418
    253 418 2 E
    97 175 1 E
    106 0 7 E

    haroldleviticusgrimm said:
    There's a little face above her tailhole. 0_0

    Damn, that's embarrassing. Is it possible to directly replace it with a fixed image direct or do I have to flag it for deletion or how do I do?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #113127
    129 179 4 Q
    post #114411
    179 283 2 E

    Nah, one isn't enough, it'll be at least 5 bangs to make sure she's howling and walking funny.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114179
    34 46 1 E
    post #114371
    66 130 4 E
    106 0 7 E
    post #113872
    71 94 1 E
    post #114351
    104 132 2 Q
    post #105118
    117 197 1 E
    post #114180
    34 47 1 S
    post #114371
    66 130 4 E
    post #114232
    224 360 2 E
    17 29 2 E

    Not a huge fan of the face but the fur detail around the crotch area is super good. Can has nude version?

  • |
  • 1
  • post #71235
    13 29 3 Q
    post #99487
    496 837 3 E
    post #114277
    234 402 1 E
    post #57411
    20 28 1 E
    post #114320
    45 84 4 E
    post #107153
    50 64 15 E
    post #114222
    108 157 2 E
    post #114076
    116 171 1 E
    post #114371
    66 130 4 E
    38 11 1 E

    flagged ..... must be an upscale problem .. i'm just amazed, art with eye problems or a pixel out of place get deleted within hours of posting .. but this remains. Don't get me wrong I like this, but clearly seems too human.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114262
    93 147 1 E
    post #114341
    394 705 3 E
    post #114377
    401 659 4 E

    Nerd Facts: Cheetahs aren't the smallest of large felines, but the largest of small felines. They're very much upscaled housecats built specifically for GOTTA GO FAST.

  • |
  • 11
  • post #114199
    71 86 1 S
    26 1 3 S
    post #114217
    276 463 3 E
    17 29 2 E
    26 1 3 S

    I'm not a downvoter, but I can take some guesses as to why people are doing it.

    • The first minute of the video is literally just text.
    • The first bit of AI video is a static image for far too long before there's any animation.
    • The 10 seconds of just logo color cycling at 1:54
    • The off-to-the-side static images
    • The "editorial commentary" style subtitles over the lyric subtitles
    • I also think the overall WIP nature of it all - even with you clarifying as such - has a lot to do with it.

    On that last point also, the Quality Standards in the Uploading guidelines do state

    Only upload finalized, polished works. We want the best representation of your work, not placeholders intended for later fixes. Please complete any necessary edits before uploading.

    What you have here is, at best, a draft, but it's not a completed work.

    Personally, I think it's an interesting concept, you just gotta cook it a little more.
    (and don't pay attention to the numbers on your posts on this site. That's a great way to send yourself kookoo-bananas.)

    Hopefully the randoms haven't dissuaded you, because I think once this is completed, this will be as interesting as it is in your mind's eye. 👍

  • |
  • 2
  • post #97157
    116 188 2 E
    post #114341
    394 705 3 E
    post #113862
    358 619 5 E
    post #114213
    355 605 1 E
    post #114255
    84 147 2 E

    I'm all in for pony x dragon. But I dont like her legs. It looks like a wierd mix of pony and anthro.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #114247
    77 71 5 Q

    thatbighorsey said:
    I think the AK element is more VZ-57, but yeah I totally want this. :)

    Hmm... I can see that on the receiver cover, but the barrel, front sight and hand guard look rather AK-esque to me – albeit in "modern" polymer for the hand guard.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #107587
    35 36 4 E
    post #107738
    84 142 5 E
    post #114150
    195 361 3 E
    post #114217
    276 463 3 E
    post #114219
    116 155 4 S

    Now you have a pristine, well nourished silver scale.
    She owns: One black dress, and one blue flower.
    She owes: Everything.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #114133
    375 616 4 E
    post #114327
    171 292 2 E