Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #106300
    15 16 17 S

    joemother7712017 said:
    Thank you Mr. Ass for the intelligence, reading the whole jargon from others on my posts is very amusing

    :D

    I wholeheartedly believe that weak minded people who have no standards and fold under the slightest pressure should not hold any power whatsoever. Post got deleted because someone got offended, as a Pole I got offended by the post getting deleted, so how can I report that then? Also from the interactions in the comments and/or score it was obvious that the majority of people were fine with that gen, so why the chopping block? Moderation on this site is dogshit.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106209
    92 160 1 E
    post #106249
    90 143 5 E

    gammavali said:
    I don't know who you are, anonymous director. But I beg you to create more feral birds, this is wonderful~

    You can see who uploaded it though via tag history.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #106358
    146 216 3 E
    86 145 4 E
    post #106003
    344 592 2 E
    post #105182
    200 301 6 Q
    post #106403
    40 30 3 S

    How I experience after eating something with habanero and ghost pepper hot sauce.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106412
    262 456 2 E
    post #105498
    280 432 5 E

    jakal179 said:
    Always enjoy seeing your generations here, and see you posting less and less. Sad to see you go but I can find you on deviant art I believe?

    appreciate that! i was hesitant to even mention the DA username at this point since i don't want to do anything that could be considered deliberately flouting the rules. thanks to lurkingfox it should be relatively easy to find if you're actually looking for it now.

    lurkingfox said:
    The DA main user page might be problematic only because it doesn't show much except the paywall, at least without logging in. You can still link on your own profile on your user page (Settings > "About Me" and "Commission Info") and your director tag wiki page. (I expect them to eventually adapt the e621 "artists" page too.)

    thanks for doing that! just way to say what you saw on the DA main user page is absolutely not paywalled content. DA just doesn't show you mature stuff if you're not logged in, which isn't something i can control. all the stuff you see in the featured, anthro and feral galleries there is full quality, unwatermarked, uncensored and allows download of the full quality version. a lot of stuff there is marked as adoptables but since i'm already posting the full quality version without any watermarks or censoring it's really just for people who enjoy collecting things and having their name associated with the image, people that didn't adopt something still get to see/download the image without restrictions.

    there is some exclusive content but i have it in one specific gallery that i don't promote to the featured or normal category pages so people don't have to wade through a bunch of stuff they're not allowed to see. some people will disagree with any type of monetization of AI stuff so those people probably won't be happy whatever i do but i actually do try quite hard to make it as unobtrusive as possible.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #106385
    147 217 6 E
    post #106389
    45 70 1 E
    23 31 1 E

    The situation with the passive's left foot is somewhat confusing...When comparing it with the right one, it is not clear where this length goes. In a good way, they should be in the same position.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #93005
    252 419 4 E

    corsetlover69 said:
    100% agree with this!

    (Also totally unrelated but seeing someone use my gens as a pfp made my day :) )

    You are welcome. Zebras are also an underrated species, and it is rare to find "good" pictures. Zebra mare are my spirit animal. And your works are always a banger, so i found my pnp :D.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106447
    459 807 3 E

    My god...how i love this. More power to interspecies riding positions. :D

  • |
  • 4
  • post #106401
    613 1.0k 19 E

    assquatch said:
    Their double standards do not end on quality control either, they're extremely inconsistent in their calls. It's obvious that they can't separate their personal preferences from guidelines at all.

    As I am still convinced that in this and in other posts, people who watch it don't give a shit about any flaws/glitch in the video, as well as moderators as I see. But no, it's still such a hyper attitude towards video quality, like I'm being paid for video quality or making money off of it. Speaking of quality, https://e6ai.net/posts/105013 earlier such a video would have been deleted without question, but no, not only does it look like they wiped their ass, but also with multiple glitches, accepted by the way Сeti

  • |
  • 6
  • post #105931
    253 386 5 Q
    post #105833
    89 167 1 E
    post #106464
    225 390 1 E
    post #106390
    36 45 5 S
    post #79293
    137 246 2 E
    post #106004
    523 925 2 E
    post #106385
    147 217 6 E
    post #106384
    265 460 1 E
    post #106461
    113 154 1 Q
    post #102788
    409 775 6 E

    zaxxxer said:
    As rb2303 said under one of another post:

    Many thanks

    I have been enjoying these builds by otter very much over time

    Saw yours recently too !

    Awesome work to both of you!!!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106332
    157 345 3 E
    post #106290
    148 215 4 E
    post #106396
    277 503 6 E
    post #106300
    15 16 17 S

    assquatch said:
    *voice and reason*

    Thank you Mr. Ass for the intelligence, reading the whole jargon from others on my posts is very amusing

    :D

  • |
  • 0
  • post #105946
    233 494 1 E

    Gosh this just tickles me so much, the blush, the eye contact, the cum, so delicious together~

  • |
  • 6
  • post #106332
    157 345 3 E
    post #105875
    77 136 2 Q
    14 17 1 E
    post #105498
    280 432 5 E

    I think there are reserved places for you to link to those things (though the info is pretty scattered...). But looking at e621:rules#advertising and uploading guidelines#ads: Since this image is not paywalled, I'm pretty sure you use your DA post directly as the source (which I added already). The DA main user page might be problematic only because it doesn't show much except the paywall, at least without logging in. You can still link on your own profile on your user page (Settings > "About Me" and "Commission Info") and your director tag wiki page. (I expect them to eventually adapt the e621 "artists" page too.)

    I suspect the main issue is that additional links elsewhere starts to look spammy, and maybe also link farming or SEO.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #106348
    41 48 2 S
    post #106347
    260 490 3 E
    post #106403
    40 30 3 S
    post #106338
    183 342 3 E
    post #106385
    147 217 6 E
    post #106372
    119 173 1 S
    post #106239
    36 28 5 S
    post #99677
    79 128 1 E
    post #106290
    148 215 4 E
    post #106416
    137 259 1 E
    155 254 3 E
    post #106412
    262 456 2 E
    post #106401
    613 1.0k 19 E

    Can't wait what the future holds for us with this fast evolving ai. ^^

  • |
  • 4
  • post #106401
    613 1.0k 19 E

    vlrgromns said:
    I love moderators for double standards, sometimes fuck for wrong moving pixel, which only under a magnifying glass will notice, but some extra limb as at 0:20, we accept, do not care. The work is good, by the way. If you play the role of moderator even more, you can still get to the teeth of the dog, would write like this ”Does not meet minimum quality standards (Artistic - the dog's teeth look like needles)"

    Their double standards do not end on quality control either, they're extremely inconsistent in their calls. It's obvious that they can't separate their personal preferences from guidelines at all.

  • |
  • 26
  • post #105655
    372 603 3 E

    how did I miss this??? Sooo dang good, presentation and everything! Your romantic stuff hits home for me as well!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #106403
    40 30 3 S
    post #106401
    613 1.0k 19 E
    post #106275
    81 194 3 E
    post #106401
    613 1.0k 19 E

    I love moderators for double standards, sometimes fuck for wrong moving pixel, which only under a magnifying glass will notice, but some extra limb as at 0:20, we accept, do not care. The work is good, by the way. If you play the role of moderator even more, you can still get to the teeth of the dog, would write like this ”Does not meet minimum quality standards (Artistic - the dog's teeth look like needles)"

  • |
  • 21
  • post #106402
    173 286 3 E
    post #106399
    315 615 2 E
    post #106401
    613 1.0k 19 E
    post #106401
    613 1.0k 19 E

    This is amazing. Please do some other famous animated dog. Nana would be the best!

  • |
  • 5
  • post #52299
    91 151 1 E
    post #106399
    315 615 2 E
    post #106332
    157 345 3 E
    post #106401
    613 1.0k 19 E
    post #104991
    64 98 6 S
    post #106401
    613 1.0k 19 E

    Damn, nice job! One of the longer videos on this site for sure.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #106052
    196 289 9 Q
    post #106390
    36 45 5 S
    post #106065
    114 197 4 E

    pawprintz15 said:
    It's the lack of shadows on the ground under their feet. They're supposed to be cast on the ground by their bodies' silhouettes.

    That's what creates the floating, or having been pasted in, illusion. It happens in game design with character models not casting a shadow.

    Appreciate the advice. I'll keep that in mind for the future.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #106390
    36 45 5 S
    post #106363
    58 92 2 E
    post #106394
    71 84 1 S
    post #106383
    173 239 1 Q
    post #106289
    157 263 2 Q
    post #106393
    148 208 2 E
    post #106374
    133 191 6 E
    post #106390
    36 45 5 S