Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #106389
    45 70 1 E
    23 31 1 E

    The situation with the passive's left foot is somewhat confusing...When comparing it with the right one, it is not clear where this length goes. In a good way, they should be in the same position.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #93005
    252 418 4 E

    corsetlover69 said:
    100% agree with this!

    (Also totally unrelated but seeing someone use my gens as a pfp made my day :) )

    You are welcome. Zebras are also an underrated species, and it is rare to find "good" pictures. Zebra mare are my spirit animal. And your works are always a banger, so i found my pnp :D.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106447
    468 817 3 E

    My god...how i love this. More power to interspecies riding positions. :D

  • |
  • 4
  • post #106401
    632 1.1k 19 E

    assquatch said:
    Their double standards do not end on quality control either, they're extremely inconsistent in their calls. It's obvious that they can't separate their personal preferences from guidelines at all.

    As I am still convinced that in this and in other posts, people who watch it don't give a shit about any flaws/glitch in the video, as well as moderators as I see. But no, it's still such a hyper attitude towards video quality, like I'm being paid for video quality or making money off of it. Speaking of quality, https://e6ai.net/posts/105013 earlier such a video would have been deleted without question, but no, not only does it look like they wiped their ass, but also with multiple glitches, accepted by the way Сeti

  • |
  • 6
  • post #105931
    255 393 5 Q
    post #105833
    91 172 1 E
    post #106464
    237 410 1 E
    post #106390
    36 44 5 S
    post #79293
    139 245 2 E
    post #106004
    541 961 2 E
    post #106385
    147 218 6 E
    post #106384
    269 467 1 E
    post #106461
    113 153 1 Q
    post #102788
    423 799 6 E

    zaxxxer said:
    As rb2303 said under one of another post:

    Many thanks

    I have been enjoying these builds by otter very much over time

    Saw yours recently too !

    Awesome work to both of you!!!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106332
    158 348 3 E
    post #106290
    151 216 4 E
    post #106396
    277 504 6 E
    post #106300
    15 16 17 S

    assquatch said:
    *voice and reason*

    Thank you Mr. Ass for the intelligence, reading the whole jargon from others on my posts is very amusing

    :D

  • |
  • 0
  • post #105946
    244 514 1 E

    Gosh this just tickles me so much, the blush, the eye contact, the cum, so delicious together~

  • |
  • 6
  • post #106332
    158 348 3 E
    post #105875
    83 140 2 Q
    14 17 1 E
    post #105498
    287 442 5 E

    I think there are reserved places for you to link to those things (though the info is pretty scattered...). But looking at e621:rules#advertising and uploading guidelines#ads: Since this image is not paywalled, I'm pretty sure you use your DA post directly as the source (which I added already). The DA main user page might be problematic only because it doesn't show much except the paywall, at least without logging in. You can still link on your own profile on your user page (Settings > "About Me" and "Commission Info") and your director tag wiki page. (I expect them to eventually adapt the e621 "artists" page too.)

    I suspect the main issue is that additional links elsewhere starts to look spammy, and maybe also link farming or SEO.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #106348
    41 48 2 S
    post #106347
    266 499 3 E
    post #106403
    40 31 3 S
    post #106338
    186 352 3 E
    post #106385
    147 218 6 E
    post #106372
    120 175 1 S
    post #106239
    36 28 5 S
    post #99677
    79 128 1 E
    post #106290
    151 216 4 E
    post #106416
    139 261 1 E
    155 253 3 E
    post #106412
    266 461 2 E
    post #106401
    632 1.1k 19 E

    Can't wait what the future holds for us with this fast evolving ai. ^^

  • |
  • 4
  • post #106401
    632 1.1k 19 E

    vlrgromns said:
    I love moderators for double standards, sometimes fuck for wrong moving pixel, which only under a magnifying glass will notice, but some extra limb as at 0:20, we accept, do not care. The work is good, by the way. If you play the role of moderator even more, you can still get to the teeth of the dog, would write like this ”Does not meet minimum quality standards (Artistic - the dog's teeth look like needles)"

    Their double standards do not end on quality control either, they're extremely inconsistent in their calls. It's obvious that they can't separate their personal preferences from guidelines at all.

  • |
  • 26
  • post #105655
    378 612 3 E

    how did I miss this??? Sooo dang good, presentation and everything! Your romantic stuff hits home for me as well!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #106403
    40 31 3 S
    post #106401
    632 1.1k 19 E
    post #106275
    81 200 3 E
    post #106401
    632 1.1k 19 E

    I love moderators for double standards, sometimes fuck for wrong moving pixel, which only under a magnifying glass will notice, but some extra limb as at 0:20, we accept, do not care. The work is good, by the way. If you play the role of moderator even more, you can still get to the teeth of the dog, would write like this ”Does not meet minimum quality standards (Artistic - the dog's teeth look like needles)"

  • |
  • 21
  • post #106402
    177 289 3 E
    post #106399
    320 624 2 E
    post #106401
    632 1.1k 19 E
    post #106401
    632 1.1k 19 E

    This is amazing. Please do some other famous animated dog. Nana would be the best!

  • |
  • 5
  • post #52299
    93 155 1 E
    post #106399
    320 624 2 E
    post #106332
    158 348 3 E
    post #106401
    632 1.1k 19 E
    post #104991
    64 98 6 S
    post #106401
    632 1.1k 19 E

    Damn, nice job! One of the longer videos on this site for sure.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #106052
    202 295 9 Q
    post #106390
    36 44 5 S
    post #106065
    116 204 4 E

    pawprintz15 said:
    It's the lack of shadows on the ground under their feet. They're supposed to be cast on the ground by their bodies' silhouettes.

    That's what creates the floating, or having been pasted in, illusion. It happens in game design with character models not casting a shadow.

    Appreciate the advice. I'll keep that in mind for the future.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #106390
    36 44 5 S
    post #106363
    58 92 2 E
    post #106394
    71 85 1 S
    post #106383
    179 245 1 Q
    post #106289
    163 270 2 Q
    post #106393
    149 209 2 E
    post #106374
    135 195 6 E
    post #106390
    36 44 5 S
    post #106385
    147 218 6 E
    post #105296
    125 253 1 E
    post #106280
    108 189 1 E
    post #106249
    90 145 5 E

    birdlover said:
    My Goodness! Arsol (?), this is amazing!

    Please continue bringing more feral birds to this world :3

    Its not that good, but im glad you like it

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106350
    183 270 2 Q

    Can't blame her for wanting to get a little closer. These two are gorgeous and they make such a lovely pair. Love the expressions and that playful little grope.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #106052
    202 295 9 Q
    post #106374
    135 195 6 E
    post #105085
    54 69 1 E
    post #106369
    160 295 1 E

    "Tredici04" my mind saw "04" and finally came to the conclusion that anyone born in '04 is 21 and now I feel old, not the vibe I wanted when looking at some good AI stuff. 😭😭😭

  • |
  • 5
  • post #106374
    135 195 6 E
    post #105971
    81 111 3 E

    mikubraver said:
    I just love geckos, her head marking are my fav thing about her. :3

    Wonder if the male is Gex. ;3

    Fully Agree :3

    Indeed he's Gex xD (I was prompting for Gex, but I failed *facepalm*)

  • |
  • 2