Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    23 31 1 E

    The situation with the passive's left foot is somewhat confusing...When comparing it with the right one, it is not clear where this length goes. In a good way, they should be in the same position.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #93005
    252 420 4 E

    corsetlover69 said:
    100% agree with this!

    (Also totally unrelated but seeing someone use my gens as a pfp made my day :) )

    You are welcome. Zebras are also an underrated species, and it is rare to find "good" pictures. Zebra mare are my spirit animal. And your works are always a banger, so i found my pnp :D.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106447
    459 806 3 E

    My god...how i love this. More power to interspecies riding positions. :D

  • |
  • 4
  • post #106401
    616 1.0k 19 E

    assquatch said:
    Their double standards do not end on quality control either, they're extremely inconsistent in their calls. It's obvious that they can't separate their personal preferences from guidelines at all.

    As I am still convinced that in this and in other posts, people who watch it don't give a shit about any flaws/glitch in the video, as well as moderators as I see. But no, it's still such a hyper attitude towards video quality, like I'm being paid for video quality or making money off of it. Speaking of quality, https://e6ai.net/posts/105013 earlier such a video would have been deleted without question, but no, not only does it look like they wiped their ass, but also with multiple glitches, accepted by the way Сeti

  • |
  • 6
  • post #105931
    253 386 5 Q
    post #105833
    89 167 1 E
    post #106464
    228 392 1 E
    post #106390
    36 45 5 S
    post #79293
    137 246 2 E
    post #106004
    525 931 2 E
    post #106385
    147 217 6 E
    post #106384
    267 462 1 E
    post #106461
    113 153 1 Q
    post #102788
    411 776 6 E

    zaxxxer said:
    As rb2303 said under one of another post:

    Many thanks

    I have been enjoying these builds by otter very much over time

    Saw yours recently too !

    Awesome work to both of you!!!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106332
    157 346 3 E
    post #106290
    148 215 4 E
    post #106396
    277 503 6 E
    post #106300
    15 16 17 S

    assquatch said:
    *voice and reason*

    Thank you Mr. Ass for the intelligence, reading the whole jargon from others on my posts is very amusing

    :D

  • |
  • 0
  • post #105946
    237 501 1 E

    Gosh this just tickles me so much, the blush, the eye contact, the cum, so delicious together~

  • |
  • 6
  • post #106332
    157 346 3 E
    post #105875
    78 137 2 Q
    14 17 1 E
    post #105498
    280 434 5 E

    I think there are reserved places for you to link to those things (though the info is pretty scattered...). But looking at e621:rules#advertising and uploading guidelines#ads: Since this image is not paywalled, I'm pretty sure you use your DA post directly as the source (which I added already). The DA main user page might be problematic only because it doesn't show much except the paywall, at least without logging in. You can still link on your own profile on your user page (Settings > "About Me" and "Commission Info") and your director tag wiki page. (I expect them to eventually adapt the e621 "artists" page too.)

    I suspect the main issue is that additional links elsewhere starts to look spammy, and maybe also link farming or SEO.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #106348
    41 48 2 S
    post #106347
    261 491 3 E
    post #106403
    40 30 3 S
    post #106338
    183 345 3 E
    post #106385
    147 217 6 E
    post #106372
    119 173 1 S
    post #106239
    36 28 5 S
    post #99677
    79 128 1 E
    post #106290
    148 215 4 E
    post #106416
    138 258 1 E
    155 254 3 E
    post #106412
    263 457 2 E
    post #106401
    616 1.0k 19 E

    Can't wait what the future holds for us with this fast evolving ai. ^^

  • |
  • 4
  • post #106401
    616 1.0k 19 E

    vlrgromns said:
    I love moderators for double standards, sometimes fuck for wrong moving pixel, which only under a magnifying glass will notice, but some extra limb as at 0:20, we accept, do not care. The work is good, by the way. If you play the role of moderator even more, you can still get to the teeth of the dog, would write like this ”Does not meet minimum quality standards (Artistic - the dog's teeth look like needles)"

    Their double standards do not end on quality control either, they're extremely inconsistent in their calls. It's obvious that they can't separate their personal preferences from guidelines at all.

  • |
  • 26
  • post #105655
    372 604 3 E

    how did I miss this??? Sooo dang good, presentation and everything! Your romantic stuff hits home for me as well!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #106403
    40 30 3 S
    post #106401
    616 1.0k 19 E
    post #106275
    81 194 3 E
    post #106401
    616 1.0k 19 E

    I love moderators for double standards, sometimes fuck for wrong moving pixel, which only under a magnifying glass will notice, but some extra limb as at 0:20, we accept, do not care. The work is good, by the way. If you play the role of moderator even more, you can still get to the teeth of the dog, would write like this ”Does not meet minimum quality standards (Artistic - the dog's teeth look like needles)"

  • |
  • 21
  • post #106402
    173 287 3 E
    post #106399
    316 617 2 E
    post #106401
    616 1.0k 19 E
    post #106401
    616 1.0k 19 E

    This is amazing. Please do some other famous animated dog. Nana would be the best!

  • |
  • 5
  • post #52299
    92 151 1 E
    post #106399
    316 617 2 E
    post #106332
    157 346 3 E
    post #106401
    616 1.0k 19 E
    post #104991
    64 98 6 S
    post #106401
    616 1.0k 19 E

    Damn, nice job! One of the longer videos on this site for sure.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #106052
    196 289 9 Q
    post #106390
    36 45 5 S
    post #106065
    115 196 4 E

    pawprintz15 said:
    It's the lack of shadows on the ground under their feet. They're supposed to be cast on the ground by their bodies' silhouettes.

    That's what creates the floating, or having been pasted in, illusion. It happens in game design with character models not casting a shadow.

    Appreciate the advice. I'll keep that in mind for the future.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #106390
    36 45 5 S
    post #106363
    58 91 2 E
    post #106394
    71 84 1 S
    post #106383
    173 239 1 Q
    post #106289
    157 263 2 Q
    post #106393
    148 208 2 E
    post #106374
    134 193 6 E
    post #106390
    36 45 5 S
    post #106385
    147 217 6 E
    post #105296
    123 248 1 E
    post #106280
    107 186 1 E
    post #106249
    90 143 5 E

    birdlover said:
    My Goodness! Arsol (?), this is amazing!

    Please continue bringing more feral birds to this world :3

    Its not that good, but im glad you like it

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106350
    178 266 2 Q

    Can't blame her for wanting to get a little closer. These two are gorgeous and they make such a lovely pair. Love the expressions and that playful little grope.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #106052
    196 289 9 Q
    post #106374
    134 193 6 E
    post #105085
    54 69 1 E
    post #106369
    157 292 1 E

    "Tredici04" my mind saw "04" and finally came to the conclusion that anyone born in '04 is 21 and now I feel old, not the vibe I wanted when looking at some good AI stuff. 😭😭😭

  • |
  • 5
  • post #106374
    134 193 6 E
    post #105971
    79 114 3 E

    mikubraver said:
    I just love geckos, her head marking are my fav thing about her. :3

    Wonder if the male is Gex. ;3

    Fully Agree :3

    Indeed he's Gex xD (I was prompting for Gex, but I failed *facepalm*)

  • |
  • 2
  • post #106373
    143 189 1 Q