Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #94661
    245 435 3 E
    post #94622
    158 247 2 E
    post #94651
    22 54 2 E
    post #94653
    213 328 2 E
    post #94608
    117 168 7 E

    Woah this is fantastic! Cleo doesnt get the love she deserves, be it on here or anywhere!

  • |
  • 2
  • post #94486
    26 31 2 E

    Very confused about the rating here. No sex organs on display, but explicit? Just a cute boi, spilling his creamer... Seems pretty SFW? 🤔

  • |
  • 0
  • 117 175 1 E
    post #94601
    79 91 1 S
    post #94628
    149 280 2 E
    post #94630
    158 247 3 Q
    post #94598
    116 156 1 Q
    post #94608
    117 168 7 E
    post #94615
    96 171 1 E
    post #94608
    117 168 7 E

    horsefucker5 said:
    It's always crazy seeing a character show up for the very first time on this website

    Yeah, I was a bit surprised there weren't any pictures of her here.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #94612
    79 154 1 E
    post #94618
    72 126 1 E

    Goat Mom rocking that thong. Visiting a hotel room for a little work maybe by the looks of it.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #94502
    67 82 1 Q
    post #94565
    120 176 3 Q
    post #94573
    66 117 4 E
    post #94608
    117 168 7 E
    post #94608
    117 168 7 E
    post #94109
    267 436 5 E

    This is the best kobold I’ve seen on here, amazing. I wonder if she is bubble gum flavored? 🤔

  • |
  • 1
  • post #94608
    117 168 7 E
    post #94609
    158 278 1 E
    post #94313
    123 220 2 E
    post #94313
    123 220 2 E
    post #79822
    75 88 4 S
    post #94565
    120 176 3 Q
    post #94602
    164 269 2 E
    post #94575
    676 1.1k 2 E

    Maned wolves are a species just obscure enough for me to regularly forget they exist, and be delighted all over again by how very legged they are when reminded.

  • |
  • 13
  • post #94551
    163 256 3 E
    post #94497
    183 326 2 E
    post #90365
    48 77 2 Q
    post #84818
    248 391 9 E
    post #94434
    126 201 4 Q
    post #93942
    37 55 3 E
    post #94547
    186 261 2 E

    horsefucker5 said:
    These are all very sexy shapes in essence. But her torso is actually completely disconnected from her haunches

    It was made using out of date models. I'm actually surprised it got approved. I'll flag it and try to find a replacement. Thanks for noticing it.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #94456
    134 239 1 Q
    post #24462
    105 179 1 E
    post #94573
    66 117 4 E
    post #94541
    131 188 3 E
    post #94547
    186 261 2 E

    These are all very sexy shapes in essence. But her torso is actually completely disconnected from her haunches

  • |
  • 0
  • post #94536
    90 166 1 E
    150 262 7 E

    lilac_clouds said:
    Hey, thanks for the comment! Really encouraging for me to see people actually like my work; I'm currently trying to rework some of the images that were deleted to bring them up to snuff. Till then, anyone who is interested is free to DM me and I'll gladly share the current edits (along with the rest of the series, a total of 14 images).

    Hey, good for you and I’m excited. This is one of the highest upvoted posts I’ve personally seen deleted so you are doing something right. Good luck!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #93302
    70 106 1 E
    post #56550
    139 259 3 E

    Time to create a separate save for um........ "future playthroughs"...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #94444
    398 678 6 E

    She certainly has been doing some training since last time~

    Always great to see your yeen, Mavefig!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #94451
    221 377 3 E
    post #94529
    129 209 2 E

    I love that she looks almost surprised haha. Anyways, this is such a great generation! Her wet mouth over his cock, her little tongue, a paw on his balls, the fluffy fur. All simply sublime!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #94549
    347 608 3 E
    post #94175
    236 392 2 E
    post #94180
    178 286 4 E
    post #94292
    99 138 2 E
    post #94384
    76 96 1 Q
    post #94444
    398 678 6 E
    post #87682
    540 868 7 E
    post #92876
    83 78 6 S

    theshoresofhell said:
    Did the AI interpreted that being that close to fire would burn the tip of their paw? hehe, that's quite impressive if it's that way

    As someone who has done a bit of inpainting, I'm going to guess:
    SD generated it with the paw overlapping the stones like that, and the genner decided to have fun with it, and added the smoke and burn mark.
    A giveaway, that I haven't figured out how to avoid, is brushstroke resolution. The grainyness elsewhere, mimicking the effect of bristles on canvas, changes in density when inpainting at a higher resolution.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #94549
    347 608 3 E
    post #93949
    298 532 3 E
    45 62 1 E
    post #94285
    42 37 1 S

    that's really nice. i wonder if it was fully generated with minor edits by hand or just selectively assisted with manual painting involved. and if it was mostly generated then i'd really like to get the model files needed for something like this

  • |
  • 2
  • post #94441
    78 127 3 E
    post #94573
    66 117 4 E
    post #49461
    188 378 2 E
    post #94573
    66 117 4 E
    25 23 1 Q
    post #94558
    46 54 2 Q
    post #94333
    131 183 6 E

    I was wondering if anyone can help me I am currently having a problem with Approver DeNatural. Every single new post I've been trying to post on the site I've been flagged multiple times I don't know why all of my stuff is legit made by a generator but somehow I've been flagged numerous occasions. So is there anyone that can help me solve my issue because I am getting a little angry about this.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90754
    273 458 20 E

    raiinbow_dash said:
    It's funny you point out those "similar images". You have the ability to blacklist them!

    I would advise you use "faceless_character" in your blacklist, instead of going to all of the faceless_character images to complain about them :)

    And pull quite a few images where NO character has eyes?

    Updated by Jelloponies


    User was banned for the contents of this message.
  • |
  • -4
  • 8 11 2 E

    hey @Dragonfox , thanks for the upload.

    I noticed you didn't seem to include a director tag.
    Are you the director of this ai-art?
    Do you know the director name of the director?? (ie. artist name of the ai-artist)

    In the meantime, I've tagged with unknown_director.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #94505
    207 358 1 E
    post #94549
    347 608 3 E
    post #94333
    131 183 6 E

    I like the partial transformation, with the black nips and skin myself. Perhaps a full on laying on back, POV with a cookie? Definitely something!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #94541
    131 188 3 E
    post #94511
    196 322 1 E