Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #90844
    260 465 3 E

    This Leafeon is SUPER cute and I hope we do see more of the like from you
    as Palpatine once said. 'We will watch your career with great interest.'

  • |
  • 2
  • post #90869
    79 104 3 Q
    post #90646
    145 220 1 E

    I really like the head shape and wider muzzle, more like a real hyena than a lot of other images. (Where it feels like they are just recoloured wolves with rounded ears.) Thanks for sharing.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #87449
    100 152 4 Q
    post #90872
    568 936 4 E
    post #90871
    158 293 6 E

    quick question gentlemen. why my penis feel hard on inside of pants

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90812
    110 197 2 E
    post #90876
    396 694 6 E
    post #75791
    264 397 15 E
    post #48034
    159 269 2 E
    68 115 3 E
    post #90016
    237 393 5 E
    146 220 2 E
    post #77359
    59 84 1 Q
    post #59724
    92 140 1 E
    post #23768
    46 78 2 E

    iaracagei said:
    It's beautiful, but the right hand looks like the left one.

    I was less attentive to the old ones than I am now.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90866
    180 315 2 E
    post #90870
    268 412 2 E
    post #90639
    189 297 2 E

    I like this very much! It's rare to see black female goats. Just give her an udder and anatomical correct female goat pussy, and it would be perfect.

  • |
  • -2
  • post #90851
    143 206 2 E
    post #90861
    250 416 3 E
    post #90774
    34 54 2 E
    post #90861
    250 416 3 E
    post #90813
    96 135 3 Q

    asscas

    Former Staff

    Absolutely adorable babe.

    Give her a gun, she'd be quite the boss.

    Great gen!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #87495
    270 320 6 Q
    post #84564
    96 116 2 S

    "Did you know gators aren't green?"

    Oh yes, plenty wild gators around here in the Southern USA. The colors vary usually from grey to black. Lighter colors don't do well in the wild.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #87884
    31 32 2 S

    mavefig said:
    What model is this? It's really impressive. Amazing detail and lighting.

    Unfortunately, there is no specific model, I merge and add loras to them myself depending on the desired result. These are merges of different types of models, and many of the pictures that I make are not made only on one checkpoint. This one, for example, is based on Helheim, where I completely cut out its CLIP and mixed it with wuxaifilmis/midgard/midnight. Therefore, there is no universal solution, alas. But this is not the highest quality generation, later I made better ones

  • |
  • 1
  • post #73344
    70 81 4 S
    post #90754
    276 462 20 E
    post #90823
    424 770 5 E
    post #67583
    204 317 4 E

    footlover95 said:
    how do you make this so realistc, its insane

    Thanks! I achieve this with a ton of different models- all good at different things, applied to different parts of the image, then a bunch of photomanip and color adjustments ;P

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90519
    232 397 6 E

    coughfuk said:
    Um...2 questions....
    Where are those sexy teats of hers?
    Where did those beautiful pink love buds go?
    Not that I'm complaining mind you.

    We haven't decided on her final look yet :)

    It would be more canonical to leave her without nipples - she is a Pokemon, not a dog, afterall. On the other hand... Within the AU, this is, as it were, quite possible.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #90760
    71 118 2 E
    post #90787
    282 458 1 E
    post #90707
    50 90 2 E
    post #90196
    228 407 2 E
    post #90754
    276 462 20 E

    shanti said:
    And what am I wrong about saying re: That eye removal is intentional and it's dumb?

    1. Comments like that are not helpful. It would be like me going on to something you created and saying "wow I think this looks dumb". Not constructive.
    2. You seem to be kind of annoying, because you really like to repeat yourself.

  • |
  • 6
  • post #90593
    31 34 1 S
    post #90680
    290 462 5 Q
    post #90750
    401 731 1 E
    post #90487
    471 831 1 E
    post #90515
    172 258 7 E

    shanti said:
    I find it more enjoyable to look at a full-figured person and imagine myself in their shoes when they have all their body parts in place.

    A preference issue isn't grounds for flagging 😐

  • |
  • 7
  • 45 68 5 E

    lemlem said:
    to no criticism of the piece itself i enjoyed the clothed version more with the clothing raggedy half on, i think it created a more fulfilled imaginary scene befit for the where the individuals are, that being a horny bar in this case

    I agree, but I was asked to do nudity

  • |
  • -1
  • post #61943
    165 291 4 E
    45 68 5 E

    to no criticism of the piece itself i enjoyed the clothed version more with the clothing raggedy half on, i think it created a more fulfilled imaginary scene befit for the where the individuals are, that being a horny bar in this case

  • |
  • 1
  • post #87097
    167 251 4 E

    She's super cute and sexy. She put her little fluffy tail on backwards, though. ;)

  • |
  • 0
  • 20 2 6 E

    technical-grid said:
    There wasn't. It's the pictogram of the mouse character being freaky in the restroom from the parent post - just in full res.
    Sometimes mods will nuke something for exaggerated reason and there's nothing you can really do about it

    I find it especially ironic that the image was already posted to the site within the parent post which is still up today.
    That's ignoring the whole high-schooler being marked as cub thing.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90697
    194 320 1 E
    post #90204
    366 730 3 E
    post #90761
    103 184 6 E
    post #90765
    180 271 2 Q
    132 302 2 E

    zheneric said:
    Is this a reupload?

    Whoops, forgot I had already uploaded a different version.
    It's sorted out now!

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90813
    96 135 3 Q
    132 302 2 E
    post #90831
    474 871 4 E
    118 187 12 E

    mikubraver said:
    When your a background character in a anime. xD

    Name me an anime where the secondary characters don't have eyes.

  • |
  • -9
  • post #90515
    172 258 7 E

    majinbreed said:
    I mean, you are welcome to just flat out call something 'stupid' but it doesn't affect the truth that a faceless male can be stylised without eyes as a means of the viewers self insertion into the image.
    It has been done plenty of times on both the AI Site and Main E6 site drawn by artists for that very reason.

    Want to make something with extra fingers, go for it, no one is stopping you. As long as it is actually part of the character, and not a temper tantrum over the rules, you are free to do what you want.

    Just remember that doing something just to be petty probably wont reflect well.

    Remember, personal growth also comes by sometime taking the L and moving on with the day
    e6 wiki page for anon, for your reading pleasure https://e621.net/wiki_pages/8336

    I find it more enjoyable to look at a full-figured person and imagine myself in their shoes when they have all their body parts in place.

  • |
  • -7
  • post #86512
    105 165 2 E
    post #90788
    68 99 1 S

    I need glasses that make my eyes glow like that. Cool Cookie moment.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90780
    271 425 6 E
    post #90760
    71 118 2 E
    post #90690
    148 236 2 E
    post #33011
    41 57 1 E
    post #90780
    271 425 6 E
    post #90381
    466 808 4 E
    post #90823
    424 770 5 E
    48 51 2 E

    badwolf1 said:
    So, what's the issue. I don't see anything messed up.

    Only thing I really saw are the hands are a bit disjointed, especially when you look at them at full res. Maybe the spear head, but the whole aesthetic of these tends to be raggedy, so I don’t mind it. I rather like this style

  • |
  • 2
  • post #90823
    424 770 5 E
    post #89186
    138 238 2 E
    post #90807
    53 90 1 E
    post #90761
    103 184 6 E
    154 259 1 E
    post #90519
    232 397 6 E

    Um...2 questions....
    Where are those sexy teats of hers?
    Where did those beautiful pink love buds go?
    Not that I'm complaining mind you.

  • |
  • 0
  • 45 68 5 E
    post #90761
    103 184 6 E