Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #90593
    31 35 1 S
    post #90680
    284 457 5 Q
    post #90750
    399 727 1 E
    post #90487
    463 818 1 E
    post #90515
    171 257 7 E

    shanti said:
    I find it more enjoyable to look at a full-figured person and imagine myself in their shoes when they have all their body parts in place.

    A preference issue isn't grounds for flagging 😐

  • |
  • 7
  • 45 68 5 E

    lemlem said:
    to no criticism of the piece itself i enjoyed the clothed version more with the clothing raggedy half on, i think it created a more fulfilled imaginary scene befit for the where the individuals are, that being a horny bar in this case

    I agree, but I was asked to do nudity

  • |
  • -1
  • post #61943
    163 289 4 E
    45 68 5 E

    to no criticism of the piece itself i enjoyed the clothed version more with the clothing raggedy half on, i think it created a more fulfilled imaginary scene befit for the where the individuals are, that being a horny bar in this case

  • |
  • 1
  • post #87097
    165 248 4 E

    She's super cute and sexy. She put her little fluffy tail on backwards, though. ;)

  • |
  • 0
  • 20 2 6 E

    technical-grid said:
    There wasn't. It's the pictogram of the mouse character being freaky in the restroom from the parent post - just in full res.
    Sometimes mods will nuke something for exaggerated reason and there's nothing you can really do about it

    I find it especially ironic that the image was already posted to the site within the parent post which is still up today.
    That's ignoring the whole high-schooler being marked as cub thing.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90697
    194 319 1 E
    post #90204
    356 718 3 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E
    post #90765
    180 270 2 Q
    132 302 2 E

    zheneric said:
    Is this a reupload?

    Whoops, forgot I had already uploaded a different version.
    It's sorted out now!

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90813
    96 136 3 Q
    132 302 2 E
    post #90831
    460 852 4 E
    post #90763
    115 183 12 E

    mikubraver said:
    When your a background character in a anime. xD

    Name me an anime where the secondary characters don't have eyes.

  • |
  • -9
  • post #90515
    171 257 7 E

    majinbreed said:
    I mean, you are welcome to just flat out call something 'stupid' but it doesn't affect the truth that a faceless male can be stylised without eyes as a means of the viewers self insertion into the image.
    It has been done plenty of times on both the AI Site and Main E6 site drawn by artists for that very reason.

    Want to make something with extra fingers, go for it, no one is stopping you. As long as it is actually part of the character, and not a temper tantrum over the rules, you are free to do what you want.

    Just remember that doing something just to be petty probably wont reflect well.

    Remember, personal growth also comes by sometime taking the L and moving on with the day
    e6 wiki page for anon, for your reading pleasure https://e621.net/wiki_pages/8336

    I find it more enjoyable to look at a full-figured person and imagine myself in their shoes when they have all their body parts in place.

  • |
  • -7
  • post #86512
    105 165 2 E
    post #90788
    67 99 1 S

    I need glasses that make my eyes glow like that. Cool Cookie moment.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90780
    264 417 5 E
    post #90760
    71 119 2 E
    post #90690
    146 231 2 E
    post #33011
    42 58 1 E
    post #90780
    264 417 5 E
    post #90381
    457 800 4 E
    post #90823
    405 740 5 E
    48 51 2 E

    badwolf1 said:
    So, what's the issue. I don't see anything messed up.

    Only thing I really saw are the hands are a bit disjointed, especially when you look at them at full res. Maybe the spear head, but the whole aesthetic of these tends to be raggedy, so I don’t mind it. I rather like this style

  • |
  • 2
  • post #90823
    405 740 5 E
    post #89186
    135 234 2 E
    post #90807
    52 89 1 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E
    154 260 1 E
    post #90519
    229 391 6 E

    Um...2 questions....
    Where are those sexy teats of hers?
    Where did those beautiful pink love buds go?
    Not that I'm complaining mind you.

  • |
  • 0
  • 45 68 5 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E
    post #90513
    139 231 1 E
    post #75206
    75 117 2 E
    post #90765
    180 270 2 Q

    I like this but it's SO very dark. Had to add some brightness, contrast, gamma, and a bit of saturation just to see her in her glory.

    Edit: Really guys? It's a lovely image. But it's a DARK, visually washed out image. Can't help that you disagree.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90813
    96 136 3 Q
    post #90780
    264 417 5 E
    post #90638
    215 356 3 E
    45 68 5 E

    phantom_tire_buyer said:
    Hell yeah! Thank you!

    I know you mentioned getting their bodies to play nice for the gen was a PITA but maybe some time her mouth can get a little closer to his uh... Zeenis. XD

  • |
  • 2
  • 45 68 5 E
    post #60689
    93 226 3 E
    post #60680
    101 217 1 E
    post #90785
    113 200 2 E

    phantom_tire_buyer said:
    Can you do a version where they are both totally nude? It's already got a bit of a fun Furronika vibe!

    I'll do it for you. I also like Furronica and Doctordj. Both draw without paints. I don't know about the vibe of Furronica and me, but his bear is good

  • |
  • 3
  • post #90635
    165 256 3 E
    post #90770
    103 169 1 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E
    5 7 1 S
    post #90754
    273 456 20 E

    Even though I still have my eyes and aren't build as good as this dude, I still wanna swap places with him.
    I could smex Glaceon 24/7.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90771
    45 62 1 E
    26 25 1 E
    post #90791
    189 296 4 E
    post #90783
    229 400 2 E
    post #90763
    115 183 12 E

    shanti said:
    More versatile? It seems to me that they are: Intentional generation errors.
    So because of some small error (an extra finger or lack thereof) we delete an image, but an image where the eyes are SPECIALLY removed, no!

    I intentionally removed the eyes through prompts "faceless man". I wanted it to be universal.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #90780
    264 417 5 E
    post #90791
    189 296 4 E
    post #90781
    248 424 2 E
    post #90686
    357 662 3 E
    post #90546
    14 10 1 S
    23 32 2 E
    post #90687
    241 435 2 E
    post #90791
    189 296 4 E
    post #90792
    201 336 1 E
    post #90743
    140 231 1 E
    32 51 1 E
    post #90724
    235 403 10 E

    This is by far the best representation of anatomically correct cow rear (udder included) I have ever seen on an anthro. Superb. Will be following your future work.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #90785
    113 200 2 E

    Can you do a version where they are both totally nude? It's already got a bit of a fun Furronika vibe!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90777
    208 298 3 E
    post #90737
    111 187 1 E
    post #90783
    229 400 2 E