Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #90763
    117 185 12 E

    mikubraver said:
    When your a background character in a anime. xD

    Name me an anime where the secondary characters don't have eyes.

  • |
  • -9
  • post #90515
    172 258 7 E

    majinbreed said:
    I mean, you are welcome to just flat out call something 'stupid' but it doesn't affect the truth that a faceless male can be stylised without eyes as a means of the viewers self insertion into the image.
    It has been done plenty of times on both the AI Site and Main E6 site drawn by artists for that very reason.

    Want to make something with extra fingers, go for it, no one is stopping you. As long as it is actually part of the character, and not a temper tantrum over the rules, you are free to do what you want.

    Just remember that doing something just to be petty probably wont reflect well.

    Remember, personal growth also comes by sometime taking the L and moving on with the day
    e6 wiki page for anon, for your reading pleasure https://e621.net/wiki_pages/8336

    I find it more enjoyable to look at a full-figured person and imagine myself in their shoes when they have all their body parts in place.

  • |
  • -7
  • post #86512
    105 166 2 E
    post #90788
    68 100 1 S

    I need glasses that make my eyes glow like that. Cool Cookie moment.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90780
    267 418 5 E
    post #90760
    71 119 2 E
    post #90690
    147 235 2 E
    post #33011
    42 57 1 E
    post #90780
    267 418 5 E
    post #90381
    463 806 4 E
    post #90823
    417 762 5 E
    48 51 2 E

    badwolf1 said:
    So, what's the issue. I don't see anything messed up.

    Only thing I really saw are the hands are a bit disjointed, especially when you look at them at full res. Maybe the spear head, but the whole aesthetic of these tends to be raggedy, so I don’t mind it. I rather like this style

  • |
  • 2
  • post #90823
    417 762 5 E
    post #89186
    136 235 2 E
    post #90807
    52 89 1 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E
    154 260 1 E
    post #90519
    230 394 6 E

    Um...2 questions....
    Where are those sexy teats of hers?
    Where did those beautiful pink love buds go?
    Not that I'm complaining mind you.

  • |
  • 0
  • 45 68 5 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E
    post #90513
    140 233 1 E
    post #75206
    74 117 2 E
    post #90765
    180 271 2 Q

    I like this but it's SO very dark. Had to add some brightness, contrast, gamma, and a bit of saturation just to see her in her glory.

    Edit: Really guys? It's a lovely image. But it's a DARK, visually washed out image. Can't help that you disagree.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90813
    96 136 3 Q
    post #90780
    267 418 5 E
    post #90638
    216 358 3 E
    45 68 5 E

    phantom_tire_buyer said:
    Hell yeah! Thank you!

    I know you mentioned getting their bodies to play nice for the gen was a PITA but maybe some time her mouth can get a little closer to his uh... Zeenis. XD

  • |
  • 2
  • 45 68 5 E
    post #60689
    95 228 3 E
    post #60680
    101 217 1 E
    post #90785
    114 202 2 E

    phantom_tire_buyer said:
    Can you do a version where they are both totally nude? It's already got a bit of a fun Furronika vibe!

    I'll do it for you. I also like Furronica and Doctordj. Both draw without paints. I don't know about the vibe of Furronica and me, but his bear is good

  • |
  • 3
  • post #90635
    165 256 3 E
    post #90770
    103 171 1 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E
    5 7 1 S
    post #90754
    273 458 20 E

    Even though I still have my eyes and aren't build as good as this dude, I still wanna swap places with him.
    I could smex Glaceon 24/7.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90771
    45 62 1 E
    26 25 1 E
    post #90791
    189 296 4 E
    post #90783
    232 400 2 E
    post #90763
    117 185 12 E

    shanti said:
    More versatile? It seems to me that they are: Intentional generation errors.
    So because of some small error (an extra finger or lack thereof) we delete an image, but an image where the eyes are SPECIALLY removed, no!

    I intentionally removed the eyes through prompts "faceless man". I wanted it to be universal.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #90780
    267 418 5 E
    post #90791
    189 296 4 E
    post #90781
    250 424 2 E
    post #90686
    360 668 3 E
    post #90546
    14 10 1 S
    23 32 2 E
    post #90687
    242 436 2 E
    post #90791
    189 296 4 E
    post #90792
    202 341 1 E
    post #90743
    140 232 1 E
    32 51 1 E
    post #90724
    235 403 10 E

    This is by far the best representation of anatomically correct cow rear (udder included) I have ever seen on an anthro. Superb. Will be following your future work.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #90785
    114 202 2 E

    Can you do a version where they are both totally nude? It's already got a bit of a fun Furronika vibe!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90777
    210 298 3 E
    post #90737
    112 188 1 E
    post #90783
    232 400 2 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E

    That must be one big bird considering the smol bird next to it, love it.

    Plus she has a cute face. :3

  • |
  • 3
  • post #90763
    117 185 12 E
    post #90724
    235 403 10 E
    post #90678
    344 671 2 E
    post #90583
    231 343 1 E
    post #90754
    273 458 20 E
    post #90774
    34 54 2 E
    post #90795
    50 83 1 Q
    post #90603
    150 210 3 Q

    corsetlover69 said:
    Oooo I love this! As my name implies I really like corsets :)

    Thank you, love them too :D especially in steampunk style.
    Your works are amazing too btw!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90733
    39 74 1 E
    post #90780
    267 418 5 E
    post #90511
    292 492 5 E
    post #90515
    172 258 7 E

    shanti said:
    It's stupid. The prettier images, with the extra finger (or lack thereof) removed... This one doesn't.

    I mean, you are welcome to just flat out call something 'stupid' but it doesn't affect the truth that a faceless male can be stylised without eyes as a means of the viewers self insertion into the image.
    It has been done plenty of times on both the AI Site and Main E6 site drawn by artists for that very reason.

    Want to make something with extra fingers, go for it, no one is stopping you. As long as it is actually part of the character, and not a temper tantrum over the rules, you are free to do what you want.

    Just remember that doing something just to be petty probably wont reflect well.

    Remember, personal growth also comes by sometime taking the L and moving on with the day
    e6 wiki page for anon, for your reading pleasure https://e621.net/wiki_pages/8336

    Updated

  • |
  • 4
  • post #90754
    273 458 20 E

    shanti said:
    What's stopping me from making an extra finger for a character? Or remove it.

    It's stupid to remove the eyes.

    Please don't leave comments like this.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #85943
    95 136 2 E
    post #90754
    273 458 20 E
    post #90763
    117 185 12 E

    shanti said:
    More versatile? It seems to me that they are: Intentional generation errors.
    So because of some small error (an extra finger or lack thereof) we delete an image, but an image where the eyes are SPECIALLY removed, no!

    No, DeNatural is correct. The eyes are removed intentionally. It's an extremely common practice. I don't like the finger rule either, but our dear janny is spot on here.

    https://e621.net/posts/4791136?q=anon+order%3Ascore+-animated
    https://e621.net/posts/4364024?q=anon+order%3Ascore+-animated
    https://e621.net/posts/4170110?q=anon+order%3Ascore+-animated

  • |
  • 7
  • 6 3 1 S