Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #33011
    41 59 1 E
    post #90780
    272 426 6 E
    post #90381
    468 810 4 E
    post #90823
    425 775 5 E
    48 51 2 E

    badwolf1 said:
    So, what's the issue. I don't see anything messed up.

    Only thing I really saw are the hands are a bit disjointed, especially when you look at them at full res. Maybe the spear head, but the whole aesthetic of these tends to be raggedy, so I don’t mind it. I rather like this style

  • |
  • 2
  • post #90823
    425 775 5 E
    post #89186
    138 237 2 E
    post #90807
    53 91 1 E
    post #90761
    103 186 6 E
    154 258 1 E
    post #90519
    234 400 6 E

    Um...2 questions....
    Where are those sexy teats of hers?
    Where did those beautiful pink love buds go?
    Not that I'm complaining mind you.

  • |
  • 0
  • 45 68 5 E
    post #90761
    103 186 6 E
    post #90513
    141 235 1 E
    post #75206
    74 117 2 E
    post #90765
    180 271 2 Q

    I like this but it's SO very dark. Had to add some brightness, contrast, gamma, and a bit of saturation just to see her in her glory.

    Edit: Really guys? It's a lovely image. But it's a DARK, visually washed out image. Can't help that you disagree.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90813
    96 135 3 Q
    post #90780
    272 426 6 E
    post #90638
    219 360 3 E
    45 68 5 E

    phantom_tire_buyer said:
    Hell yeah! Thank you!

    I know you mentioned getting their bodies to play nice for the gen was a PITA but maybe some time her mouth can get a little closer to his uh... Zeenis. XD

  • |
  • 2
  • 45 68 5 E
    post #60689
    95 229 3 E
    post #60680
    104 218 1 E
    post #90785
    115 202 2 E

    phantom_tire_buyer said:
    Can you do a version where they are both totally nude? It's already got a bit of a fun Furronika vibe!

    I'll do it for you. I also like Furronica and Doctordj. Both draw without paints. I don't know about the vibe of Furronica and me, but his bear is good

  • |
  • 3
  • post #90635
    166 259 3 E
    post #90770
    103 172 1 E
    post #90761
    103 186 6 E
    5 7 1 S
    post #90754
    278 462 20 E

    Even though I still have my eyes and aren't build as good as this dude, I still wanna swap places with him.
    I could smex Glaceon 24/7.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90771
    45 62 1 E
    26 25 1 E
    post #90791
    190 297 4 E
    post #90783
    234 408 2 E
    118 187 12 E

    shanti said:
    More versatile? It seems to me that they are: Intentional generation errors.
    So because of some small error (an extra finger or lack thereof) we delete an image, but an image where the eyes are SPECIALLY removed, no!

    I intentionally removed the eyes through prompts "faceless man". I wanted it to be universal.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #90780
    272 426 6 E
    post #90791
    190 297 4 E
    post #90781
    253 429 2 E
    post #90686
    367 671 3 E
    post #90546
    14 10 1 S
    23 32 2 E
    post #90687
    244 440 2 E
    post #90791
    190 297 4 E
    post #90792
    204 344 1 E
    post #90743
    143 233 1 E
    32 51 1 E
    post #90724
    236 403 10 E

    This is by far the best representation of anatomically correct cow rear (udder included) I have ever seen on an anthro. Superb. Will be following your future work.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #90785
    115 202 2 E

    Can you do a version where they are both totally nude? It's already got a bit of a fun Furronika vibe!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90777
    213 302 3 E
    post #90737
    112 193 1 E
    post #90783
    234 408 2 E
    post #90761
    103 186 6 E

    That must be one big bird considering the smol bird next to it, love it.

    Plus she has a cute face. :3

  • |
  • 3
  • 118 187 12 E
    post #90724
    236 403 10 E
    post #90678
    351 677 2 E
    post #90583
    234 344 1 E
    post #90754
    278 462 20 E
    post #90774
    34 54 2 E
    post #90795
    51 85 1 Q
    post #90603
    150 211 3 Q

    corsetlover69 said:
    Oooo I love this! As my name implies I really like corsets :)

    Thank you, love them too :D especially in steampunk style.
    Your works are amazing too btw!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90733
    39 73 1 E
    post #90780
    272 426 6 E
    post #90511
    297 498 5 E
    post #90515
    173 259 7 E

    shanti said:
    It's stupid. The prettier images, with the extra finger (or lack thereof) removed... This one doesn't.

    I mean, you are welcome to just flat out call something 'stupid' but it doesn't affect the truth that a faceless male can be stylised without eyes as a means of the viewers self insertion into the image.
    It has been done plenty of times on both the AI Site and Main E6 site drawn by artists for that very reason.

    Want to make something with extra fingers, go for it, no one is stopping you. As long as it is actually part of the character, and not a temper tantrum over the rules, you are free to do what you want.

    Just remember that doing something just to be petty probably wont reflect well.

    Remember, personal growth also comes by sometime taking the L and moving on with the day
    e6 wiki page for anon, for your reading pleasure https://e621.net/wiki_pages/8336

    Updated

  • |
  • 4
  • post #90754
    278 462 20 E

    shanti said:
    What's stopping me from making an extra finger for a character? Or remove it.

    It's stupid to remove the eyes.

    Please don't leave comments like this.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #85943
    95 136 2 E
    post #90754
    278 462 20 E
    118 187 12 E

    shanti said:
    More versatile? It seems to me that they are: Intentional generation errors.
    So because of some small error (an extra finger or lack thereof) we delete an image, but an image where the eyes are SPECIALLY removed, no!

    No, DeNatural is correct. The eyes are removed intentionally. It's an extremely common practice. I don't like the finger rule either, but our dear janny is spot on here.

    https://e621.net/posts/4791136?q=anon+order%3Ascore+-animated
    https://e621.net/posts/4364024?q=anon+order%3Ascore+-animated
    https://e621.net/posts/4170110?q=anon+order%3Ascore+-animated

  • |
  • 7
  • 6 3 1 S
    post #90754
    278 462 20 E

    shanti said:
    What's stopping me from making an extra finger for a character? Or remove it.

    It's stupid to remove the eyes.

    Choose a different hill to die on. This is common.

  • |
  • 11
  • 2 1 1 E
    post #88299
    519 979 7 E
    post #90724
    236 403 10 E
    post #90515
    173 259 7 E

    majinbreed said:
    cannot see why this was flagged.
    nothing out of the ordinary here.
    if flagged for male eyes then that is wrong due to using an 'eyeless' male to depict the 'anon' character, without a green head.

    It's stupid. The prettier images, with the extra finger (or lack thereof) removed... This one doesn't.

  • |
  • -9
  • 118 187 12 E

    DeNatural

    Former Staff

    shanti said:
    Where are the eyes?!

    its in minimalist self-insertion style. You remove facial details, especially eyes, to make characters more universally relatable.

  • |
  • 7
  • post #90702
    284 538 2 E