Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #70313
    88 127 1 E
    post #70366
    77 122 3 E
    post #69063
    41 46 3 E
    post #70247
    98 198 1 E
    post #26548
    165 276 2 E
    post #70204
    14 21 4 E
    post #70316
    222 425 3 E
    post #69985
    82 147 1 E
    post #70001
    22 24 2 S
    post #70190
    47 71 1 E
    post #70026
    37 71 2 Q
    post #70204
    14 21 4 E
    post #70030
    71 111 5 E
    post #70030
    71 111 5 E

    BirdLover

    Member

    tomaej said:
    Raven?

    Yep. I gotta admit that I did not know what happened at first (I was prompting for raven, the bird species). What I got was totally unexpected but awesome. So I removed the other bird tags and then this happened. Kinda hot I'd say :>

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #63252
    173 248 3 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    neodymium said:
    Whatever you say, HorseFucker5

    Damn, I didn't know the *********** community was so sensitive. I was trying to be polite, but y'all got your dicks in a twist. And maybe in a few other things as well. No judgement😘

  • |
  • -4
    •
    post #70267
    164 297 2 E
    post #70229
    158 253 1 E
    post #70134
    162 284 1 E
    post #70026
    37 71 2 Q
    post #70065
    284 496 1 E
    post #70288
    25 42 1 Q
    post #70085
    143 264 1 E
    post #70090
    236 422 3 E
    post #70114
    235 422 1 E
    post #70267
    164 297 2 E
    post #70188
    116 167 1 S
    post #70224
    102 178 1 E
    post #70186
    115 181 2 E

    user 1880

    Member

    Couldn't bring my self to edit out the cute bottlecat

    It's ok, we all know cats are a liquid, a bottle is just their natural habitat.

  • |
  • 6
    •
    post #70250
    181 347 2 E
    post #70258
    123 201 1 E
    post #69573
    66 103 3 E

    badwolf1

    Member

    raiinbow_dash said:
    Am I seeing no hands on head, and hands on head in the reflection?

    Looks to me in the reflection the hands are holding nothing, a head is missing.
    Maybe on his chest above a head that's out of sight going down?? : )

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #70231
    33 49 3 S
    post #70235
    101 198 1 E
    post #70164
    98 176 2 E
    post #70233
    93 133 1 E
    69 127 11 E
    69 127 11 E

    FlowerSylveon

    Privileged

    gregtheanon said:
    Double standards… e621 allows this, yet e6ai does not? I’m surprised other sites have not overtaken e621/e6ai at all.

    congratulations for not reading the big pile of text above which i did explained
    if you didn't want to and want to know the answer directly from a staff member then check forum #22 where Lance Armstrong literally says

    I haven't been told the reason, but my guess is that it is to avoid legal complications that could be caused by image models that are trained on actual child pornography. Even if 100% of those posts come from models trained only on furry drawings, the risk remains.

    The legal battles involving AI art are just starting. For all we know this site will have to shut down within a few years if the copyright battles play out a certain way.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #70231
    33 49 3 S
    69 127 11 E

    Technical-Grid

    Janitor

    Eh, originally the male was about 70% of what is visible here, so I've scaled up his limbs and buffed him up, to somewhat retain the size difference (and hold it within 18-20yrs because the original was definitely too young) , but i guess the female is too big after all for it to count :/

  • |
  • 0
    •
    69 127 11 E

    GregTheAnon

    Member

    Double standards… e621 allows this, yet e6ai does not? I’m surprised other sites have not overtaken e621/e6ai at all.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #69960
    136 261 1 E
    post #67105
    63 79 1 S
    post #67095
    340 528 3 E
    post #67082
    66 74 2 S

    Ferox

    Member

    sylvermare53 said:
    We need more of that grumpy cat, on the side...

    I was gonna say I'd love to see more of this donkey lady m'self. S'good replacement page though.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #70217
    145 201 1 E
    post #70158
    168 266 7 E

    Pervo

    Blocked

    gosh. tall and long, must be strong. boing boing boing. video generation is becoming so good

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #70186
    115 181 2 E
    post #67453
    162 254 4 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    potato_salad said:
    I don't put much thought into the descriptions, man. Saw the cloud was illuminated so maybe sun is out of veiw of us, but the deer can see it

    Don't worry,I was just being cheeky

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #67998
    105 173 4 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    purplesimp said:
    Yes I can see why, I just love this picture ratio as it's just the full character body, that why I love Dakimakura picture too, I will see to make good one like this with different picture ratio

    Hey I'm not complaining at all. In Fact I just discovered the fit(vertical) button😅

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #70143
    45 73 2 E
    post #68018
    112 176 1 E
    post #70123
    55 78 2 E

    blp

    Member

    foxymutt said:
    I like 👍

    thanks! i'm very slow but i didn't forget about your request. :) i actually have a few more to post, probably on Monday.

    and congrats on you 1k posts 😺

    heh, not so sure i should be proud of that.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #70129
    37 56 2 E
    post #70126
    31 30 4 E

    blp

    Member

    foxymutt said:
    Nice 👍

    thanks! i'm glad people seem to like this. i hesitate before posting these experimental (or sketchy) styles especially after the advent of the stricter quality control.

    pretty sure something like this ( https://e6ai.net/posts/53975 ) with its weird, surreal background wouldn't get approved these days although the people i asked before posting said they actually thought it added to the image rather than being a flaw.

    yero8 said:
    Can you please make a female version of this art, if possible? Very nice

    here you go: https://e6ai.net/posts/70203

    also a version with canine-ish anatomy on rule34.xxx. don't want to post too many similar things here: https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=11638476

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #65520
    121 187 5 Q

    Jethro

    Member

    horsefucker5 said:
    It's bonkers that there are only 2 pictures of Sheila on this entire website. I really must be an old-fur because I'm guessing the new generation of furries probably don't know who she is.

    You might be right! I'll never forget Sheila from the 90s! We need more of her here!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #68098
    227 381 5 Q
    post #70064
    281 455 3 E
    post #68271
    14 14 2 S
    post #69826
    9 55 2 E
    post #70030
    71 111 5 E
    post #70182
    63 94 1 E
    post #70126
    31 30 4 E
    post #70117
    24 38 3 Q
    post #70158
    168 266 7 E
    post #70149
    120 226 2 E

    user 27826

    Member

    horsefucker5 said:
    I know he's a fox, but come on, there's nothing he can do with that thing. It would be like trying to fit a pool noodle inside a Chihuahua

    He can still use his tongue and hands. I know I would.

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #70057
    48 75 1 E
    post #67013
    167 276 5 E

    badwolf1

    Member

    cybercraft said:
    About right to me.

    I agree, this one after looking at her over and over again and making a little wish, is not bad at all.
    But front_pussy really kills some good art.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #70121
    44 61 1 E
    post #70126
    31 30 4 E
    post #70129
    37 56 2 E
    post #67940
    204 336 13 E
    post #70123
    55 78 2 E
    post #58488
    94 154 5 E

    wolfucker666

    Member

    FYI kangaroos actually have their testicles on the *other* side of the penis, very unique part of their anatomy compared to other mammals

  • |
  • 3
    •
    69 127 11 E

    FlowerSylveon

    Privileged

    chastitycoyote said:
    but it is interesting to see obvious bias on what constitutes flagging and not.

    that's on the user who is flagging, one user doesn't represent everyone

    chastitycoyote said:
    why the possible underage female at the start of this pool was not flagged by them as well.

    if you mean the first picture it's because it doesn't have any sort of lewd acts happening, looks to be just a wedding or somesorts

    and in my opinion i could view most of the pictures just as size difference than age difference
    but just judging but the tags that have been put here it's clearly not the intention and it is an age difference

    however the description does say "18th birthday" but that or any description doesn't mean anything if it doesn't correlate to the image
    however 2:electric boogalo, this male fox in this pic alone doesn't look underage or anything, just looks like an young adult and i think that the one who flagged this thought of the first picture and went along with the second because as contrary of post #70056 which does look underage, the size of the fox is relatively ok in every aspect, even the dick as not all adults with dicks will suddenly have a cock with half the length of the body

    anyways the ones that are flagged now seems to be the right ones to be removed while the others seems ok

    feckin_ded_m8 said:
    That's absolutely ridiculous. Who on earth was in charge of that idea?

    Who's to say any NN or model hasn't been trained on actual porn of underage people(because yes it has happened before more than just once)
    You can't be too sure and go "well mine certainly doesn't"
    And the problem is using data of pornographic material of minors can lead to some funny law stuff which i'm pretty certain it's not funny at all if it happens

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #70108
    303 590 2 E