Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #68098
    228 384 5 Q
    post #70064
    284 461 3 E
    post #68271
    15 14 2 S
    post #69826
    9 56 2 E
    post #70030
    71 111 5 E
    post #70182
    66 95 1 E
    post #70126
    31 30 4 E
    post #70117
    24 37 3 Q
    post #70158
    169 264 7 E
    post #70149
    122 226 2 E

    horsefucker5 said:
    I know he's a fox, but come on, there's nothing he can do with that thing. It would be like trying to fit a pool noodle inside a Chihuahua

    He can still use his tongue and hands. I know I would.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #70057
    50 75 1 E
    post #67013
    167 274 5 E

    cybercraft said:
    About right to me.

    I agree, this one after looking at her over and over again and making a little wish, is not bad at all.
    But front_pussy really kills some good art.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #70121
    44 60 1 E
    post #70126
    31 30 4 E
    post #70129
    37 56 2 E
    post #67940
    205 337 13 E
    post #70123
    56 79 2 E
    post #58488
    96 156 5 E

    FYI kangaroos actually have their testicles on the *other* side of the penis, very unique part of their anatomy compared to other mammals

  • |
  • 3
  • 69 127 11 E

    chastitycoyote said:
    but it is interesting to see obvious bias on what constitutes flagging and not.

    that's on the user who is flagging, one user doesn't represent everyone

    chastitycoyote said:
    why the possible underage female at the start of this pool was not flagged by them as well.

    if you mean the first picture it's because it doesn't have any sort of lewd acts happening, looks to be just a wedding or somesorts

    and in my opinion i could view most of the pictures just as size difference than age difference
    but just judging but the tags that have been put here it's clearly not the intention and it is an age difference

    however the description does say "18th birthday" but that or any description doesn't mean anything if it doesn't correlate to the image
    however 2:electric boogalo, this male fox in this pic alone doesn't look underage or anything, just looks like an young adult and i think that the one who flagged this thought of the first picture and went along with the second because as contrary of post #70056 which does look underage, the size of the fox is relatively ok in every aspect, even the dick as not all adults with dicks will suddenly have a cock with half the length of the body

    anyways the ones that are flagged now seems to be the right ones to be removed while the others seems ok

    feckin_ded_m8 said:
    That's absolutely ridiculous. Who on earth was in charge of that idea?

    Who's to say any NN or model hasn't been trained on actual porn of underage people(because yes it has happened before more than just once)
    You can't be too sure and go "well mine certainly doesn't"
    And the problem is using data of pornographic material of minors can lead to some funny law stuff which i'm pretty certain it's not funny at all if it happens

  • |
  • 0
  • post #70108
    306 596 2 E
    post #70111
    266 432 1 E
    post #70135
    58 61 2 S
    post #70160
    124 217 3 E
    post #61944
    375 669 2 E
    post #70146
    26 35 1 Q
    post #70149
    122 226 2 E

    I know he's a fox, but come on, there's nothing he can do with that thing. It would be like trying to fit a pool noodle inside a Chihuahua

  • |
  • 0
  • post #70158
    169 264 7 E
    post #70159
    194 387 2 E
    post #70159
    194 387 2 E
    post #70160
    124 217 3 E
    post #69179
    101 152 2 E
    69 127 11 E

    anon said:

    It's likely flagged because for whatever reason on e6ai you aren't allowed to have cub or young subjects doing lewd acts even though they are fine with it on e621. Makes no sense at all

    That's absolutely ridiculous. Who on earth was in charge of that idea?

  • |
  • 1
  • post #70158
    169 264 7 E
    69 127 11 E

    anon said:

    It's likely flagged because for whatever reason on e6ai you aren't allowed to have cub or young subjects doing lewd acts even though they are fine with it on e621. Makes no sense at all

    Going by the flaggers metrics, curious why the possible underage female at the start of this pool was not flagged by them as well.

    I completely agree and understand the TOS of the site on why underage is verboten, but it is interesting to see obvious bias on what constitutes flagging and not.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #69752
    23 29 1 E
    post #70145
    75 88 2 E
    post #68965
    95 157 1 E
    69 127 11 E

    badwolf1 said:
    flag.. why?
    Looks wonderful to me.

    It's likely flagged because for whatever reason on e6ai you aren't allowed to have cub or young subjects doing lewd acts even though they are fine with it on e621. Makes no sense at all

  • |
  • 4
  • 69 127 11 E
    post #70100
    66 66 1 Q
    post #69120
    6 14 2 S

    scout said:
    Contrarily to what you might think, not everyone downvotes because of disliking the actual art content depicted. My reasons for downvoting an image like this personally is the low-quality format it's being saved at and uploaded. I don't even have to zoom in to see all the obvious jpeg artifacts pretty much everywhere. It's actually against the uploading policy to not meet the quality standard for uploads on e6ai, you should read that. Highly, badly compressed jpegs would be good enough for twitter or other social medias where every art gets put through their compression algorithm and every art piece loses quality anyway, but archiving services aims to retain the best quality format possible.

    With all the AI tools available for generating, upscaling, img2img, hi-res fix, inpainting, there's no excuse for uploading a badly compressed version of the generated image on here.

    Also, low-effort tagging is really annoying to some user. I actually have 'gun' in my blacklist for a reason. Don't need to see, don't care. Yet I keep seeing them because you don't take the minimum effort of tagging your content appropriately and thoroughly. When you don't do that, you're just inviting people to see content they don't wanna see and downvote them. I shouldn't have to manually edit every post by adding tags that I don't wanna see to finally have a good browsing experience on e6ai.

    Apologies

  • |
  • -3
  • post #70090
    238 424 3 E
    post #70102
    50 69 1 S
    post #69899
    101 176 1 E
    post #69904
    55 73 1 E
    post #69906
    31 31 1 S
    post #69942
    217 347 1 E
    post #69962
    117 219 4 E
    post #47914
    331 581 2 E
    post #70028
    260 494 1 E
    post #70052
    217 379 1 E
    post #69954
    71 144 2 E
    post #70072
    53 56 1 S
    post #70059
    82 91 1 S
    post #70025
    327 610 5 E
    post #69975
    50 75 1 S
    post #69978
    90 117 2 Q
    post #67752
    133 222 5 E
    post #69994
    113 236 1 E
    post #70061
    64 66 1 Q

    *background music*
    ~why can't we be friends~
    ~why can't we be frieends~
    ~why can't we be frieeends~

  • |
  • 6
  • post #70075
    31 29 1 S
    post #70080
    114 166 1 Q
    post #70030
    71 111 5 E
    post #66836
    80 141 1 E
    post #69976
    67 93 3 Q
    post #69930
    49 60 5 Q

    gemuseachmed said:
    I know what you mean. Im trying t pull at least some sort of comic pages off with AI and manual painting. Its quiet some work. Dont know if it'll work out.
    But it will be NSFW.

    awesome, but i mean like a movie from pixart or something

  • |
  • 1
  • post #69976
    67 93 3 Q
    post #69827
    234 478 3 E

    iobeyhumans said:
    How I always get A+? I'm just great that's all~

    Thats not teacher, they co-ed students. She just small as bunny specie, and guy a healthy moose

  • |
  • 2
  • post #69491
    86 125 2 E
    post #69801
    112 151 4 E
    post #69896
    26 46 2 E
    post #69970
    18 24 1 S
    post #69738
    16 16 1 S
    post #70009
    23 37 1 E
    post #69953
    122 229 3 E

    loveall said:
    This a random generated picture so the one who made it didn't tag himself, I would gladly tag anyone before using their stuff

    Ahh, I didn't know that was a thing, fascinating, but ok

  • |
  • 1