Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #63520
    91 115 6 S

    nocheamante said:
    If we ever got the the point of allowing anthros to be born, looking like this would greatly soften non-furries in society.

    To be fair, most anti-furries don't strike me as anti-anthros, just people who dislike the furry fandom. If real furries existed, the fact that they're another sapient species would be a big deal, bigger than how they look. They're no longer a drawing, but a real living and thinking person.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #58732
    59 98 1 E
    post #68775
    183 274 5 E
    post #68847
    2 12 5 S

    "Русский фурь неприхотлив, зато очень похотлив"

  • |
  • 3
  • post #68779
    167 269 5 E

    Damn. That's flawless. The symmetry of the jewelery across the limbs, the execution of the spinal spikes. It's even got mostly correct shadowing from the light source. Damn!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #68824
    119 163 3 E
    post #68212
    105 169 4 E
    post #68292
    41 76 1 E
    post #52723
    130 163 8 E

    denatural said:
    Umm, in the description there’s a link to my blog where I’ve already should have explained everything to get you going. If anything’s still unclear, feel free to ask me on Discord, and I’ll be happy to help with any questions.

    I saw the prompts that were used to generate the images, but that page doesn't tell what you use the prompts in? Like Perchance.org or what not. That's what I was asking about :)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #68574
    107 136 4 E
    44 57 1 E
    post #68829
    4 16 1 E
    post #48096
    94 137 2 E
    post #68818
    36 47 5 Q
    post #63177
    54 85 6 E
    post #68748
    105 154 1 E
    post #68804
    55 81 2 E
    post #68782
    158 234 6 E

    p1xel~d0g said:
    AI forgot the rat's large incisors. Nice image anyways...

    I actually had a version like that, and also this one, I preferred the teeth on this one, little more nasty bite :P I do have a mouse that is similar with more accurate teeth though that will upload soon :D

  • |
  • 4
  • post #68818
    36 47 5 Q
    post #68775
    183 274 5 E
    post #31773
    15 11 4 S
    post #68460
    180 318 1 E
    post #68623
    209 341 4 E
    post #68782
    158 234 6 E
    post #68776
    92 163 2 E
    post #68271
    15 14 2 S
    post #46468
    205 326 3 E

    fresh said:
    talk about going balls deep

    Now I need to see this more, is there a [tag] for that?

    givemeyourteeth said:
    Hope next time he puts his balls all the way in and she locks him inside her.

    That would be idealistic, I like it. I always kind of pictured female Arcanine as a "bigger" girl, who would be able to accommodate that nicely.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #68698
    184 302 4 E
    post #46240
    204 317 3 E
    post #46239
    192 306 1 E
    post #68631
    98 134 1 E

    Woah! This whole sequence was really good! And creative! Those magic binding have a lot of potential for shenanigans lol

  • |
  • 1
  • post #45823
    181 275 1 E
    post #45618
    180 315 3 E
    post #68779
    167 269 5 E
    post #68577
    64 131 2 E
    post #68581
    46 72 1 Q
    72 103 1 Q
    post #68775
    183 274 5 E
    post #53486
    138 227 1 E
    post #68139
    178 318 2 E
    post #66007
    178 267 1 E
    post #67533
    273 423 2 E
    post #68784
    148 257 2 E
    post #61640
    69 108 6 E

    ohnowhat said:
    Was quietly waiting for a 100% feral, anatomically-correct kazooie post from BirdLover
    and talk about meeting expectations!

    AFAICT this is the first one on this site
    (post #54331 seems more semi-anthro rather than feral, because of the arm/back)

    Thanks. Always happy to oblige xD
    Kazooie is hot. Feral Kazooie even more so!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #68779
    167 269 5 E
    post #68564
    66 99 7 E
    post #68574
    107 136 4 E
    82 145 1 E
    post #68670
    125 229 1 E
    post #68692
    40 69 1 E
    post #68727
    90 161 2 E
    post #68775
    183 274 5 E
    post #68779
    167 269 5 E
    post #12439
    462 767 9 E
    post #68520
    227 392 2 E
    post #68524
    4 58 5 E

    torrin said:
    Aight, now we’ve gone too far

    Not far enough. She just didn't get to transform long enough before the photo was snapped. Give her a few seconds or minutes.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #68564
    66 99 7 E
    post #66890
    29 51 1 Q
    post #66995
    85 143 5 E
    post #67813
    193 334 3 E
    post #68467
    62 84 3 Q
    post #68741
    111 154 3 E
    post #47322
    66 71 2 S
    post #68671
    187 268 4 E
    post #68023
    139 194 4 E

    charlyss said:
    very pretty *

    <3

    Thank you! ♥️♥️♥️
    You also posted some great horse and pony rumps for us to delight ourselves!
    Keep up the great work! 😘

  • |
  • 1
  • post #68686
    29 41 2 S
    post #68727
    90 161 2 E
    post #68734
    37 89 1 Q
    post #68666
    139 218 2 E
    post #68739
    22 28 1 E
    post #68733
    83 149 1 Q
    post #68717
    70 92 2 E
    post #68751
    15 18 3 S

    just a note: need to tag what you see, not what you prompted with. tags also should use an underscore rather than spaces. looking at viewer is three separate tags - looking, at and viewer which is probably not what you want.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #68741
    111 154 3 E