Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #50559
    94 148 1 E
    post #50608
    24 38 2 E
    post #50497
    230 401 1 E
    post #50000
    132 195 3 E

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    eclipsetheorca said:
    prompts

    Agree, would be nice to see prompts. I want to make some experiment with same draw design - for example different poses, rear view with raised tail, human type of genitalia. Anyway, looks beautiful.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #50213
    11 13 2 S
    post #34429
    80 126 4 E
    post #11788
    143 269 4 E

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    dracohide said:
    People like you don't seem to realizie the time and efferot it takes to achieve such polished results.
    Try it, before speaking.

    I agree that you will not receive a good result from first try. In my uploads I spend much less effort than artist that draws manually without AI, so I will never charge money for that. Also, I mostly enjoyed when generating image even with bad anatomy because you see your favorite type of anthro character and can view him on different poses or activities, so I don't feel that I do hard work. It's fun and pleasure.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #4779
    55 94 1 E
    post #50506
    37 56 3 E

    blp

    Member

    foxymutt said:
    Someone looks moody but I got just the thing to cheer her up

    don't tell me, i can figure it out on my own. it's gentle headpats. right? that just might work!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #50248
    307 555 2 E
    post #32901
    141 261 2 E
    post #48453
    169 292 3 E

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    It would be nice to see full character, how it looks like. With same drawing design. His sword should not be staid anonymous

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #2748
    20 39 1 E
    post #33849
    46 88 2 E
    post #32665
    23 34 3 Q

    ListerTheSquirrel

    Member

    hyperion said:
    Sorry for not replying. Yes, Hyperion should be director. I will make changes

    Thanks for the reply.
    Since hyperion tag was still in category character, and you say it should be a director tag:
    I have changed that tag to being in director category.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #43063
    148 307 1 E

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    That scene looks amazing. It’s sad that AI director embarrassed and preferred to stay anonymous because I also want to see other content from same director.

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #50272
    23 26 1 S
    post #50601
    23 23 4 S

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    Also, you will meet here long-time approval. That’s normal and wait around week. With such art you will meet zero problems with approval.

    If you want to do NSFW too, make sure that adult character not looks like children and you will meet zero problems too with approval. Otherwise you will walk on thin ice.

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #50601
    23 23 4 S

    Azure fur

    Member

    yetanotheraiuser said:
    On top you will find "Tags"
    Open it than find own tag and click "Edit"
    After that you can delete what you wrote in brackets

    Just found it! But thanks.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #50601
    23 23 4 S

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    azure_fur said:
    Never posted before. How do I set an artist tag, and a character tag?

    On top you will find "Tags"
    Open it than find own tag and click "Edit"
    After that you can delete what you wrote in brackets

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #50217
    271 475 3 E
    post #50552
    41 69 2 E
    post #50306
    180 314 1 E
    40 75 2 E

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    Thanks for reminding! Good anthro character that I also like but forgot about it. And in that site these is small amount of it, so I also want to fix that later.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #50446
    53 76 1 E

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    I played ratched and clank but never thought that he hides something really big under clothing. How did he hide it all the time?

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #50323
    54 78 1 E

    Beerwolf

    Privileged

    It would be appreciated if you'd adjust your tags between images instead of copy/pasting the whole set... "vaginal" when there's anal here? "Penetration" when there's none in another later image? Like, come on...

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #50560
    24 27 3 S
    post #50543
    54 78 3 Q
    post #41362
    85 165 1 E
    post #50035
    76 92 1 S
    post #50308
    160 223 2 E
    post #50344
    60 102 1 E
    post #50407
    48 93 1 E
    post #50507
    37 43 2 E
    post #50543
    54 78 3 Q
    post #50556
    65 111 1 Q
    post #50569
    47 66 1 Q
    post #50475
    117 204 3 E
    post #50408
    154 252 2 E
    post #35566
    80 111 2 E
    post #50481
    278 504 3 E
    post #50506
    37 56 3 E
    post #50485
    50 77 1 E
    post #50504
    242 461 2 E
    post #50463
    91 124 7 Q
    post #50490
    131 199 3 E
    post #50473
    27 30 1 S
    post #50490
    131 199 3 E
    post #50475
    117 204 3 E
    post #50327
    104 162 7 E

    Technical-Grid

    Janitor

    dt12 said:
    interesting and sad at the same time, because in fact e621 there are a lot of such works, and at a much younger age. No matter how you look at it, she is classified as young rather than cub/loli, it seems to me that there is a big difference between them.

    Yes, recently e621 banned all humanoid underage explicit content due to potential thread to site's existence, but furry stuff in this spectrum is still allowed (for now at least).
    I'm expecting that they'll be forced to ban that too in the future but we'll see.

    Cub explicit content is banned outright here (which sets it apart from main e621), due to AI being barely regulated in law regard, and it being a sensitive topic already. Just don't make the characters appear too young and you're good

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #48791
    64 78 3 S
    post #50463
    91 124 7 Q
    post #50406
    292 502 4 E
    post #50389
    195 332 4 E
    post #50460
    52 112 1 E
    post #48224
    48 101 2 E
    170 264 2 E
    post #38275
    85 123 1 E
    post #50423
    65 112 5 E

    WolfsChaser

    Member

    listerthesquirrel said:
    hey WolfsChaser, THANK YOU very much for all the artworks.

    I notice the DA in the Source field has username wolfs-chaser.
    Would you prefer your director/artist tag at e6ai be wolfs-chaser???

    (edit: because current tag of "wolfschaser" could be mis-read as Wolf Schaser)

    Yes, it would be very cool to replace it. Thank you! <3 It would also be cool if the admins added a post planning system to the site.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #50217
    271 475 3 E
    post #50308
    160 223 2 E
    post #50036
    20 40 2 Q

    Karryn

    Member

    badwolf1 said:
    Love to see more of her.
    With the grass she looks small, like actual dog size.

    She is on the smaller side but not small enough to be called an ankle biter :)
    The "dog" part is fairly close - her tribe are cattle herders so waving the pointy stick at lost coyote is about as good at hunting as she gets.
    It would be hard to approach anything stealthily with a pelt of snow white anyway. You would be seen from miles away for most of the year.
    Of course if you ask her she is the Wolf, apex predator and terror of the lands (once brought home a squirrel).

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #50406
    292 502 4 E
    post #50190
    182 350 8 E

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    polar said:
    i can see it why it can be interpreted as "someone exploring themselves mid transformation".

    That was my first experience, where I meet first person 69 where you located on top. Even on E621 I didn’t find something like your image that looks decent and where you located on top. So, you are the pioneer of a new direction of first-person view

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #50190
    182 350 8 E

    polar

    Member

    yetanotheraiuser said:
    I just now realized how to interpret this. At first place for me that looks like solo. Humans transform into dragon and looks how transformation looks like, but not fully transformed. After your description started looking at it differently. 69 position as you intented but in first person view. That really confusing, because you and I was right, but it depends on what angle you look at it from (except for <3, that really my mistake). You should revert tags that I cancelled, since it's your work and you intented it to be first person 69. At that case nothing wrong with tags.

    i can see it why it can be interpreted as "someone exploring themselves mid transformation".

  • |
  • 0
    •
    138 209 2 E
    post #50423
    65 112 5 E

    ListerTheSquirrel

    Member

    hey WolfsChaser, THANK YOU very much for all the artworks.

    I notice the DA in the Source field has username wolfs-chaser.
    Would you prefer your director/artist tag at e6ai be wolfs-chaser???

    (edit: because current tag of "wolfschaser" could be mis-read as Wolf Schaser)

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #40605
    70 105 1 Q

    AdarJoor

    Member

    I really love the idea that her uniform top is really just a leotard she wears under her uniform pants. Makes sense considering the clingy nature of her uniform.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #50190
    182 350 8 E
    post #50190
    182 350 8 E

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    I just now realized how to interpret this. At first place for me that looks like solo. Humans transform into dragon and looks how transformation looks like, but not fully transformed. After your description started looking at it differently. 69 position as you intented but in first person view. That really confusing, because you and I was right, but it depends on what angle you look at it from (except for <3, that really my mistake). You should revert tags that I cancelled, since it's your work and you intented it to be first person 69. At that case nothing wrong with tags.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #50190
    182 350 8 E

    polar

    Member

    yetanotheraiuser said:
    When tagging you should not copy tags that you used for generating image if you got radically another image. Definitely you don't see in the image "<3", "69 position", "sex", 'male/ambiguous", "ambiguous gender". You used it for image generation, something goes wrong and generated something another. If you know how to force generating first person view like that let me know. I want to test it in my favorite male anthro characters too. Don't known how exactly you forced it by using "<3" or "69 position" tags in image generation.

    i don't copy prompts to serve as tags. ever. i go by "tag what you see".

    "<3" => there are hearts next to the penis. that's what the tag itself means, no? hearts in the picture.
    "69 position" => the gen is a 69 position from perspective of the human. they're implied to be laying on the belly of the dragon.
    "male/ambiguous" and "ambiguous gender" => only one of the participants is clearly a male. yeah, the hands are sort of "manly" but that's besides the point of "tag what you see". all you see of the human are hands
    "sex" => i did miss that one, probably linked to some of the other tags.

    do feel free to use the image as a base for anything in similar position. the base i used for creation of this one was made in NAI, modified with gimp and then inpainted with couple 1.5 models. all in all, around four hours of work. the tail was surprisingly the hardest part to do...

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #50055
    213 405 2 E
    post #50327
    104 162 7 E

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    drelk said:
    It was deleted cuz explicit young content. To my surprise, it seems here unlike the e621, cub/loli content doesn't allowed

    I'm tried to look how loli content looks like on e621 and I can't see that content without creating account. Never bothered to create account on e621. In my case it doesn’t feet my tastes anyway, so I don’t really care about it, but e621 definitely solved that problem by requiring you to log in, so anonymous user can't see that content.

    At the current stage experimenting with such content on e6ai is like walking on thin ice. Even in that image I have big difficulties to determinate if she adult or not.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #50190
    182 350 8 E

    YetAnotherAIuser

    Member

    When tagging you should not copy tags that you used for generating image if you got radically another image. Definitely you don't see in the image "<3", "69 position", "sex", 'male/ambiguous", "ambiguous gender". You used it for image generation, something goes wrong and generated something another. If you know how to force generating first person view like that let me know. I want to test it in my favorite male anthro characters too. Don't known how exactly you forced it by using "<3" or "69 position" tags in image generation.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #50327
    104 162 7 E

    DT12

    Member

    drelk said:
    It was deleted cuz explicit young content. To my surprise, it seems here unlike the e621, cub/loli content doesn't allowed

    interesting and sad at the same time, because in fact e621 there are a lot of such works, and at a much younger age. No matter how you look at it, she is classified as young rather than cub/loli, it seems to me that there is a big difference between them.
    I just hope to see more of her works because they are very nice :>

  • |
  • 0
    •