Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #50504
    242 461 2 E
    post #50463
    91 124 7 Q
    post #50490
    131 199 3 E
    post #50473
    27 30 1 S
    post #50490
    131 199 3 E
    post #50475
    117 204 3 E
    post #50327
    104 162 7 E

    dt12 said:
    interesting and sad at the same time, because in fact e621 there are a lot of such works, and at a much younger age. No matter how you look at it, she is classified as young rather than cub/loli, it seems to me that there is a big difference between them.

    Yes, recently e621 banned all humanoid underage explicit content due to potential thread to site's existence, but furry stuff in this spectrum is still allowed (for now at least).
    I'm expecting that they'll be forced to ban that too in the future but we'll see.

    Cub explicit content is banned outright here (which sets it apart from main e621), due to AI being barely regulated in law regard, and it being a sensitive topic already. Just don't make the characters appear too young and you're good

  • |
  • 2
  • post #48791
    64 78 3 S
    post #50463
    91 124 7 Q
    post #50406
    292 502 4 E
    post #50389
    195 331 4 E
    post #50460
    52 112 1 E
    post #48224
    48 101 2 E
    170 264 2 E
    post #38275
    85 123 1 E
    post #50423
    65 112 5 E

    listerthesquirrel said:
    hey WolfsChaser, THANK YOU very much for all the artworks.

    I notice the DA in the Source field has username wolfs-chaser.
    Would you prefer your director/artist tag at e6ai be wolfs-chaser???

    (edit: because current tag of "wolfschaser" could be mis-read as Wolf Schaser)

    Yes, it would be very cool to replace it. Thank you! <3 It would also be cool if the admins added a post planning system to the site.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #50217
    271 475 3 E
    post #50308
    160 223 2 E
    post #50036
    20 40 2 Q

    badwolf1 said:
    Love to see more of her.
    With the grass she looks small, like actual dog size.

    She is on the smaller side but not small enough to be called an ankle biter :)
    The "dog" part is fairly close - her tribe are cattle herders so waving the pointy stick at lost coyote is about as good at hunting as she gets.
    It would be hard to approach anything stealthily with a pelt of snow white anyway. You would be seen from miles away for most of the year.
    Of course if you ask her she is the Wolf, apex predator and terror of the lands (once brought home a squirrel).

  • |
  • 0
  • post #50406
    292 502 4 E
    post #50190
    182 350 8 E

    polar said:
    i can see it why it can be interpreted as "someone exploring themselves mid transformation".

    That was my first experience, where I meet first person 69 where you located on top. Even on E621 I didn’t find something like your image that looks decent and where you located on top. So, you are the pioneer of a new direction of first-person view

  • |
  • 1
  • post #50190
    182 350 8 E

    yetanotheraiuser said:
    I just now realized how to interpret this. At first place for me that looks like solo. Humans transform into dragon and looks how transformation looks like, but not fully transformed. After your description started looking at it differently. 69 position as you intented but in first person view. That really confusing, because you and I was right, but it depends on what angle you look at it from (except for <3, that really my mistake). You should revert tags that I cancelled, since it's your work and you intented it to be first person 69. At that case nothing wrong with tags.

    i can see it why it can be interpreted as "someone exploring themselves mid transformation".

  • |
  • 0
  • 138 209 2 E
    post #50423
    65 112 5 E

    hey WolfsChaser, THANK YOU very much for all the artworks.

    I notice the DA in the Source field has username wolfs-chaser.
    Would you prefer your director/artist tag at e6ai be wolfs-chaser???

    (edit: because current tag of "wolfschaser" could be mis-read as Wolf Schaser)

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #40605
    70 105 1 Q

    I really love the idea that her uniform top is really just a leotard she wears under her uniform pants. Makes sense considering the clingy nature of her uniform.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #50190
    182 350 8 E
    post #50190
    182 350 8 E

    I just now realized how to interpret this. At first place for me that looks like solo. Humans transform into dragon and looks how transformation looks like, but not fully transformed. After your description started looking at it differently. 69 position as you intented but in first person view. That really confusing, because you and I was right, but it depends on what angle you look at it from (except for <3, that really my mistake). You should revert tags that I cancelled, since it's your work and you intented it to be first person 69. At that case nothing wrong with tags.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #50190
    182 350 8 E

    yetanotheraiuser said:
    When tagging you should not copy tags that you used for generating image if you got radically another image. Definitely you don't see in the image "<3", "69 position", "sex", 'male/ambiguous", "ambiguous gender". You used it for image generation, something goes wrong and generated something another. If you know how to force generating first person view like that let me know. I want to test it in my favorite male anthro characters too. Don't known how exactly you forced it by using "<3" or "69 position" tags in image generation.

    i don't copy prompts to serve as tags. ever. i go by "tag what you see".

    "<3" => there are hearts next to the penis. that's what the tag itself means, no? hearts in the picture.
    "69 position" => the gen is a 69 position from perspective of the human. they're implied to be laying on the belly of the dragon.
    "male/ambiguous" and "ambiguous gender" => only one of the participants is clearly a male. yeah, the hands are sort of "manly" but that's besides the point of "tag what you see". all you see of the human are hands
    "sex" => i did miss that one, probably linked to some of the other tags.

    do feel free to use the image as a base for anything in similar position. the base i used for creation of this one was made in NAI, modified with gimp and then inpainted with couple 1.5 models. all in all, around four hours of work. the tail was surprisingly the hardest part to do...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #50055
    213 405 2 E
    post #50327
    104 162 7 E

    drelk said:
    It was deleted cuz explicit young content. To my surprise, it seems here unlike the e621, cub/loli content doesn't allowed

    I'm tried to look how loli content looks like on e621 and I can't see that content without creating account. Never bothered to create account on e621. In my case it doesn’t feet my tastes anyway, so I don’t really care about it, but e621 definitely solved that problem by requiring you to log in, so anonymous user can't see that content.

    At the current stage experimenting with such content on e6ai is like walking on thin ice. Even in that image I have big difficulties to determinate if she adult or not.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #50190
    182 350 8 E

    When tagging you should not copy tags that you used for generating image if you got radically another image. Definitely you don't see in the image "<3", "69 position", "sex", 'male/ambiguous", "ambiguous gender". You used it for image generation, something goes wrong and generated something another. If you know how to force generating first person view like that let me know. I want to test it in my favorite male anthro characters too. Don't known how exactly you forced it by using "<3" or "69 position" tags in image generation.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #50327
    104 162 7 E

    drelk said:
    It was deleted cuz explicit young content. To my surprise, it seems here unlike the e621, cub/loli content doesn't allowed

    interesting and sad at the same time, because in fact e621 there are a lot of such works, and at a much younger age. No matter how you look at it, she is classified as young rather than cub/loli, it seems to me that there is a big difference between them.
    I just hope to see more of her works because they are very nice :>

  • |
  • 0
  • post #50190
    182 350 8 E
    post #50335
    48 73 2 E
    post #50211
    227 382 5 E
    post #50130
    36 54 5 E
    post #11728
    108 241 4 E

    vbs said:

    genital close-up first person view, foreshortening, disembodied hand, penis grab, holding balls, detailed orange fur, gynomorph nidoqueen standing, faceless, penis towards viewer, hands on hips, penis, shower, black outline by taran fiddler by honovy by omega56, glistening detailed scales, cold colors, shaded, dim lighting, digital drawing (artwork), detailed background

    Good prompt! I tried on some of my favorite anthro males characters and result looks delicions. I will credit your post when I will upload my shower scene based on your prompt.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #50354
    63 135 1 E
    post #50355
    175 292 2 E
    post #50335
    48 73 2 E
    post #50331
    31 35 4 E

    yetanotheraiuser said:
    Also, you need to put warning text and sign on image because I think most of users will not get it, why you post too simple looking picture. So it will be combined with AI tool to generate figure and image editor to input text.

    Makes sense. I'll add a child post, when I get near my PC.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #50211
    227 382 5 E

    A condom???? hell no!

    Im going in BAREBACK to give her a belly full of pups!

    Updated by Hal Greaves


    User received a warning for the contents of this message.
  • |
  • 0
  • post #50331
    31 35 4 E

    Also, you need to put warning text and sign on image because I think most of users will not get it, why you post too simple looking picture. So it will be combined with AI tool to generate figure and image editor to input text.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #50327
    104 162 7 E

    dt12 said:
    our beautiful vixen in an even more beautiful realistic formula while playing with her mouth ummmm <3 I love this, we need more of her as always :>

    What happened to the previous pictures that they were deleted?

    It was deleted cuz explicit young content. To my surprise, it seems here unlike the e621, cub/loli content doesn't allowed

  • |
  • 3
  • post #50331
    31 35 4 E
    post #50273
    16 16 3 S
    post #50327
    104 162 7 E

    our beautiful vixen in an even more beautiful realistic formula while playing with her mouth ummmm <3 I love this, we need more of her as always :>

    What happened to the previous pictures that they were deleted?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #49680
    15 10 3 S

    I don’t want to interrupt making your great looking SFW, but can you make some NSFW? Of course, if you are versus that don’t do it and ignore my request. Thanks for attention! Also if you strictly versus NSFW, than you should include that info in description because it's not clear will you make NSFW on request.
    But if you are not versus, then I need these SFW to NSFW conversion. Really like these characters
    https://e6ai.net/posts/38239?q=omgechounknown
    https://e6ai.net/posts/30701?q=omgechounknown

  • |
  • 0
  • post #31773
    15 11 4 S
    post #36661
    116 186 1 E
    post #50209
    88 146 3 E
    post #49172
    87 132 2 Q
    post #50273
    16 16 3 S

    yetanotheraiuser said:
    Remind warning signs like this https://e621.net/posts?tags=warning_sign+lluisabadias
    I really liked that idea and abstract image turn on your imagination and looks good, but I forget about it.
    Thanks for the reminder! It will be nice to see horny warning signs for male werewolf, monsters, demons, lizards, dragons and etc if you are not versus

    I didn't know, if it would be appropriate to post them here, but decided to try. I have one for snakes too :D

  • |
  • 1
  • post #47867
    97 155 1 E

    I wonder what will happen next.

    You didn't bring me a gold? Really? You never known that dragons going mad without it? But don’t worry my trainer. I have a better idea how you can fix your mistake.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #32218
    115 220 1 E
    post #35746
    35 70 2 E
    post #50171
    105 169 1 E
    post #10427
    62 143 1 E
    post #49412
    60 81 1 S
    post #50273
    16 16 3 S
    post #50209
    88 146 3 E
    post #50294
    19 20 1 S
    post #50303
    33 54 1 E
    post #16848
    21 28 3 Q
    post #33914
    39 52 3 Q
    post #23840
    28 49 1 Q

    Ok yeah I. SOLD she is definitely confirmed a candidate for big tittle goth girlfriend
    2025 !! Dx ❤️

  • |
  • 3
  • post #24419
    19 45 1 E
    post #50217
    271 475 3 E
    post #50213
    11 13 2 S
    post #49306
    21 22 1 S
    post #48787
    33 51 3 E
    post #34706
    32 39 3 S
    post #49157
    15 15 1 E
    post #39294
    28 35 1 E
    post #43990
    41 43 2 S