Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #48497
    47 60 2 Q

    Wow, this is probably the most detailed and simultaneously very coherent background I saw here. Pretty rare mix for an AI, usually you can keep things coherent only by simplifying the scene. Great job!

  • |
  • 4
  • post #48456
    55 64 4 Q

    technical-grid said:
    Is that your character? (OC)

    No, its a character belonging to Jeremy Benral, Champagne from the Sex Fur website. The Lora was trained off that data set of a secondary artist of the website primarly but the checkpoint i used overides that style strongly with realism and fake painting methods. She has pretty distinct markings and accessories she's rarely without. It would be possible to pick her out from a crowd of of fox pictures.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #46682
    29 41 1 E
    post #46683
    33 46 2 E
    post #47882
    285 462 2 E
    post #48090
    17 26 2 E
    post #48523
    29 34 1 E
    post #48195
    112 182 4 E

    k3y said:
    Interesting, I haven't tried that yet. Since I mostly focus on horses for now I guess small penises won't really concern me. :D
    Perhaps I will regenerate this picture once I get the better prompt.

    haces unos caballos muy sexys y buenos, sigue asi que estan muy ricos esos caballos <3

  • |
  • 1
  • post #48369
    93 152 1 E
    post #48529
    76 131 1 E
    post #48453
    169 292 3 E
    post #48458
    46 85 1 E
    post #48348
    279 502 2 E
    post #40776
    160 240 2 E
    post #48367
    4 8 3 Q
    post #38588
    143 260 1 E
    post #48385
    41 52 1 S
    post #48497
    47 60 2 Q
    post #48493
    42 65 1 E
    post #47122
    120 176 2 E
    post #48483
    137 296 3 E

    This is incredible. The angle, the details on the perineum, the muscles on the legs. Probably in the top five best AI generated images I've ever seen. Well done director!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #47883
    47 72 4 E
    post #47869
    49 74 2 E
    post #47932
    55 82 2 E
    post #48135
    29 43 2 E

    hot~coffee said:
    Now THIS is what I've been hoping to see.
    Good job bro, I love it 👌

    Thank you. It's always great to hear positive feedback ;)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #48367
    4 8 3 Q

    I think there ought to be a branch off for "Muscular"... "Grotesquely_Muscular" :|

  • |
  • 1
  • post #48028
    119 190 2 Q
    post #48268
    40 48 3 E
    post #43610
    28 25 1 E
    post #48456
    55 64 4 Q
    post #48454
    74 98 1 E
    post #48456
    55 64 4 Q

    Champagne needs to be changed to a character tag, system wont let me do it if it already exists as another tag.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #48404
    45 59 2 E
    post #48417
    23 34 1 E
    post #48407
    80 117 1 E
    post #48055
    115 204 1 E

    "You know, micros don't tend last long in Gen Pop. But you're in luck, I've got a private cell for you."

  • |
  • -2
  • post #46606
    54 74 1 E

    I'd love to see his father and mother. Maybe even larger, more muscular. More grey fur

  • |
  • 0
  • post #44643
    87 130 2 E
    post #48049
    57 89 1 E
    post #48255
    43 46 1 S
    post #48298
    35 52 2 E
    post #48298
    35 52 2 E
    post #48192
    70 106 1 E
    post #48224
    48 101 2 E
    post #48246
    140 243 2 E
    post #48273
    8 8 1 S

    BirdOvO, why do you keep putting that image as a parent image to literally every upload you do..? Are you just mashing "12345" in its field for the sake of it? That's not what it's for -.-;

  • |
  • 0
  • post #48242
    63 95 2 E
    post #39795
    401 620 5 E
    post #48235
    120 204 2 E
    post #47699
    119 208 1 E

    Idk if you have a name for her yet, but she's lovely.It's nice to have this much of her

  • |
  • 0
  • post #48272
    12 26 1 E
    post #48271
    46 55 1 E
    post #48238
    47 60 3 E

    blp said:
    ❤️
    i knew someone was going to like that one. :)

    She's definitely my new favorite australian shepherd amazing job😻👌

  • |
  • 1
  • post #48238
    47 60 3 E
    44 51 2 Q
    post #47829
    42 45 4 Q
    post #48137
    51 75 1 E
    post #47874
    37 40 2 E

    darthdude said:
    These are really low resolution

    Noted - some of these I made a while back, I'll see about trying to upscale them in future uploads

  • |
  • 2
  • post #44750
    116 158 2 E
    post #48242
    63 95 2 E
    post #48238
    47 60 3 E
    post #48235
    120 204 2 E
    post #48195
    112 182 4 E

    chastitycoyote said:
    What I find hard to get besides sheathes, is small penises. Seems the furry AI stuff takes one from furry artists playbook so to them, a small penis must be the size of your arm at a minimum. 8-P

    Interesting, I haven't tried that yet. Since I mostly focus on horses for now I guess small penises won't really concern me. :D
    Perhaps I will regenerate this picture once I get the better prompt.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #48130
    22 36 2 E

    penisfire said:
    What's with dream.ai not letting me do porn? I went there, and it says it can't do it because it's nsfw, then says to use their wombot thing, which makes me sign up for yet another thing. Then it brings me to some weird interface that only allows SFW and everything is public and shared. That was a maze to a dead end.

    Funny thing about that, I actually use Frosting.AI for the original images, which i then put into Dream.AI to help enhance/improve the quality of the image, then lastly regenerate the image again through Frosting.AI to get the final product, which just so happens to use the Dream.AI/engine for their software. I should probably change the description to Frosting.AI but hek, that's gonna be a lot of editing post lol.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #43742
    73 137 1 E
    post #47810
    104 196 1 E
    post #48130
    22 36 2 E

    What's with dream.ai not letting me do porn? I went there, and it says it can't do it because it's nsfw, then says to use their wombot thing, which makes me sign up for yet another thing. Then it brings me to some weird interface that only allows SFW and everything is public and shared. That was a maze to a dead end.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #48034
    159 269 2 E
    post #39196
    59 49 9 S

    technical-grid said:
    I think it's a bit of a stretch to compare Jack Savage with David Hopkins's Jack 😅

    True true, but with the amount of rampant and often nuts crossovers in the furryverse, it IS plausible 8-P

  • |
  • 0
  • post #48195
    112 182 4 E

    What I find hard to get besides sheathes, is small penises. Seems the furry AI stuff takes one from furry artists playbook so to them, a small penis must be the size of your arm at a minimum. 8-P

  • |
  • 4
  • post #39196
    59 49 9 S

    chastitycoyote said:
    Jack was a character from a furry web comic of the same name, dealt with the angel of death, hell, and a serial killer in hell among many other things...

    Obviously they as Zootopias finest, are trying to get to the bottom of it.

    I think it's a bit of a stretch to compare Jack Savage with David Hopkins's Jack 😅

  • |
  • 0
  • post #48176
    83 132 3 E
    post #47869
    49 74 2 E
    post #47883
    47 72 4 E
    post #47002
    50 106 10 E

    overlord_69 said:
    Creating the images doesn't take me any time or effort, creating a new account less, publishing doesn't take me anything either, you (and I) waste your time trying to correct me on something that I don't care about xd

    Your results are good but your attitude is trash. And what's more confusing is that the tags don't look like they were even bad. Like this was actually a pretty fine job. Just don't ignore the rating tag. So long as you get that one right then people don't care if the only other tags are merely "male, penis, goodra, overlord_69". You can be a lazy tagger but NOT when it comes to the rating. So I don't get this rebellious persona you're putting on. You're not a bad enough tagger for it to make sense.

  • |
  • 7