Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #46752
    45 109 3 E

    ophire said:
    Wow she looks so cute with such massive breasts to hug her body sized groin. Imagine getting to spend every day walking around with those~

    I dunno that “walking” is really an option, here.

    Also, are they part dachshund? The torso would need to be unusually long for the hips to be so far away from the shoulders.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138637
    48 55 2 S
    post #101891
    34 47 1 E
    post #138513
    286 564 4 E
    93 143 13 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    Why I'm getting negative dislikes just for pointing out the truth? People in here are so stupid, is not like I'm the one banning it... don't take it on me.

    I didn't down vote you but I can guess at some of the reasons why people might have.

    It would seem in general that the users of this site dislike this policy, at least if this post's vote ratio is to be believed. And even though you don't set the policy, and I assume from one of your replies that you don't necessarily agree with this policy, people will still reflexively down vote. The 'shoot the messenger' phenomenon.

    With the way your original comment is phrased "Looks too realistic, may get nuked.", it is ambiguous as to whether you support this policy or not. Some users may have taken this as approval or encouragement of any such action.

    It may also be the case that people think your comment draws attention to the (allegedly) realistic style of this post, and they are hoping if no one says anything perhaps it will slip through unnoticed. Plus it could potentially add weight to the decision to remove the post, as in "Oh look, even the users notice how (allegedly) realistic this post is".

    I don't know how likely that last one is, and it seems unlikely that anything you or anyone else said would have any bearing on the decision here. For the record I don't agree with the guideline banning explicit realistic feral images/videos.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #138402
    189 333 1 E
    post #131877
    86 144 1 E
    post #138595
    309 514 3 E
    177 335 4 E
    post #138542
    197 284 3 E
    post #38789
    83 114 1 E
    post #138562
    54 79 1 E
    post #138084
    440 662 13 E
    post #138505
    116 182 6 Q
    110 175 1 E
    post #136252
    214 338 2 E
    post #138567
    152 193 5 E
    post #138573
    76 127 1 E
    109 179 1 E
    170 287 3 E
    post #138498
    235 364 1 Q
    post #128964
    103 172 1 E
    post #116054
    84 134 1 Q
    post #138513
    286 564 4 E
    post #138530
    121 137 3 S

    This is my favorite type of video. Just enough movement to bring a great picture to life, but avoiding the uncanny valley of trying to create movement that the ai isn't quite ready to handle

  • |
  • 2
  • post #138537
    109 189 3 E
    post #138543
    212 379 10 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    And natural selection would never create pupils that become heart shaped during mating. Very unscientific🧐

  • |
  • 6
  • post #138569
    173 295 2 Q
    63 89 2 E

    Could you repost with a fix? I thought it was perfect and was just about to save it.

  • |
  • 0
  • 238 378 2 E

    A great view. truly one of the best ways of presenting.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138569
    173 295 2 Q
    post #124622
    126 181 1 E
    post #138576
    27 37 2 Q
    post #138576
    27 37 2 Q
    post #138545
    111 149 1 Q
    post #121802
    11 12 2 E
    post #138397
    141 236 5 E
    post #138539
    237 439 1 E
    post #37055
    36 6 6 Q
    post #118481
    260 447 2 E
    post #133586
    176 282 1 E
    post #118353
    88 159 1 E
    post #138519
    307 546 2 E
    post #138489
    195 319 4 E
    post #138513
    286 564 4 E
    post #138365
    139 245 3 E
    post #138536
    294 469 1 Q
    post #138516
    65 69 5 Q
    post #138568
    106 204 1 E
    post #138519
    307 546 2 E
    post #135125
    89 94 7 Q

    This is very exciting! I'm glad you are back with more lovely otters <3 Good to see you again my friend

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138040
    41 43 1 S
    post #138071
    626 1.2k 13 E
    19 37 1 E
    post #138543
    212 379 10 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    What's even the point of pointing out inconsistencies with real life when you are talking about fictional animals..? Especially when said animal has a humanoid pussy in the first place. I honestly fail to understand.

  • |
  • 11
  • post #138549
    184 346 1 E
    post #130813
    214 339 1 E
    post #138510
    169 257 1 E
    post #138543
    212 379 10 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    Provide examples! 😍

  • |
  • 8
  • post #138499
    272 447 5 E
    post #138468
    126 190 2 Q
    post #138486
    106 164 2 E
    post #138504
    85 104 1 Q
    post #138505
    116 182 6 Q
    post #138466
    172 329 1 E
    post #135941
    179 314 2 E

    That's perfect. If it's not too much trouble, what do you use to generate it? It seems to me you only use a template, that's perfect.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138254
    137 213 3 E
    post #138541
    113 212 2 E
    post #136748
    106 102 12 S

    You have just generated the counterpart to the Mona Lisa's smile - furry style.

    I'll be coming back here anytime I feel down. That smile is heartwarming AF.
    Apologies if I'm being a creep here right now. :<

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #136741
    114 166 6 Q

    That level of realism and detailed fur/hair is... "stunning" wouldn't begin to describe it.
    And not just that. The detail on every rose, the paws, the irregularity of the fur... it's beyond anything i have seen generated.

    Makes me want to stop generating and posting anything really :x

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138431
    63 117 1 E
    post #138489
    195 319 4 E
    post #138542
    197 284 3 E
    238 378 2 E
    38 48 5 E

    tsuruchi said:
    Hunh. Would you believe me if I told you I didn't even pay attention to that at all? I do use negative prompts, "Signature, watermark, logo, patreon, name", but even doing that they still pop in and I don't catch them. Thanks for the heads up.
    I'll scrutinize and post another one, I'm just kinda "testing the waters" for uploading images.

    Heh, yeah I believe it. It's easy to miss little errors, and they're really strict about it here, so you'd be well advised to really scrutinize your stuff with a fine-tooth comb. Extra fingers/toes, weird-looking fingers or uneven numbers of them, misshapen eyes or even nostrils, JPG compression, AI signatures... they're all grounds for merciless deletion. 😮

    Well, like raiinbow dash pointed out, you can always remove this one by hand or crop it out, that's easy enough. Then you can just reupload it and it should pass, I think.

  • |
  • 0