Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #137467
    271 459 4 E
    post #137343
    273 414 4 E

    really impressive what is possible to do with a simple static image, I give full support in creating this type of video with my images, including how this type of video is made, any specific platform? not that I want to try hehe ;>

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114489
    121 169 2 Q
    post #132337
    301 461 4 E
    post #132333
    52 58 2 S
    post #125312
    87 76 3 S
    post #137450
    50 60 1 S
    post #36279
    107 33 11 E

    kifuusaki said:
    Time to add more tags to blacklist. Including the director...

    It is such a wild poison pill because everything else from this creator is crazy sexy

  • |
  • 0
  • post #104039
    259 465 2 E
    post #118564
    188 325 4 E
    post #96539
    98 164 1 E
    post #96537
    100 167 1 E
    post #137425
    42 44 1 S
    post #133598
    367 656 1 E
    post #111886
    511 852 4 E
    post #137433
    51 69 2 E
    post #136306
    182 281 8 E

    knotanotherfurry said:
    Sure that makes sense the majority of the time, I think this situation is a little different. Because the person who made this image also gave out the prompt to make this image and it uses "young" and "child" a couple of time each. So I can understand why it was taken down and surprised it's back up.

    Totally irrelevant as well. Direct quote from the guidelines: Regardless of what you know from outside sources, only tag what you can see in the image.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #137372
    36 78 10 Q
    post #136218
    120 195 2 Q

    Zoc

    Member

    notthatclassic said:
    Omggg dude you uploaded it, very nice look of her! Like usual for ya!

    lol I didnt but Berto has my premission to upload my stuff as he links back to me.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #137433
    51 69 2 E
    post #137428
    104 169 3 E
    34 60 1 E
    post #137259
    129 204 3 E
    post #137387
    301 493 2 E
    post #137259
    129 204 3 E
    post #137269
    118 183 3 E
    post #136045
    279 480 4 E
    post #137372
    36 78 10 Q
    post #136977
    37 34 3 S

    Deep into the dark depths do they wander. Do I dare sense a collection?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #137351
    124 179 1 E

    WOAH thats a pretty! wonderfull.
    i love this image and PetPetPet it with my mouse...
    my favorite style is cartoon, yes, but that image here???
    it prooves for me again to not BlackList something.
    reality can be a beauty and everything else too i guess... because AI?

    haha whatever, i love that image very much.
    thanks for shareing <3

  • |
  • 0
  • 48 71 1 E
    post #137359
    103 159 2 E
    post #137364
    202 336 3 E
    post #137368
    65 109 1 E
    post #137388
    200 346 4 E

    Yes bro. I love a picture with a story. I need a ninetails who orders me around😭

  • |
  • 2
  • post #137365
    64 133 1 E
    127 211 2 E

    That just means the Pokémon wants to be under the trainer's control and that the trainer wants to dominate it.

  • |
  • 0
  • 18 23 1 Q
    80 87 4 S

    theeffortgenner said:
    B-But....Dat ass!

    I believe her ass would look the same if the tail was located in a more anatomically correct way. I'm not saying her ass look ugly, or that the animation is ugly.

  • |
  • -2
  • 80 87 4 S

    alaskan_huzky said:
    I wonder if anyone agrees with me, if humans had tails (or if anthro furries were real) their tails would be very close to the butt, and they would hang MUCH more vertically. Anyone else agree with this? To me, this tail in the animation, is too high up and too horizontal. Remember, the tail is an extension of the vertebral column. The tail should start where the human coccyx is. So, assuming that humanoid has human like bones, the tail is completely wrongly position and bended in an impossible angle. Just saying.

    B-But....Dat ass!

  • |
  • 6
  • post #137380
    136 207 3 E
    post #136905
    169 220 1 E
    post #137372
    36 78 10 Q

    rawdog said:
    No.
    But the upvote is there to say "I like this." Why wouldn't the downvote be there to say "I don't like this?" If I don't like something I see, I click the button. It's not that deep

    But the people voting this down are objectively wrong

  • |
  • 0
  • 45 85 2 E
    80 87 4 S

    I wonder if anyone agrees with me, if humans had tails (or if anthro furries were real) their tails would be very close to the butt, and they would hang MUCH more vertically. Anyone else agree with this? To me, this tail in the animation, is too high up and too horizontal. Remember, the tail is an extension of the vertebral column. The tail should start where the human coccyx is. So, assuming that humanoid has human like bones, the tail is completely wrongly position and bended in an impossible angle. Just saying.

  • |
  • -5
  • post #137372
    36 78 10 Q

    redpanda2025 said:
    I'm just curious, do you clowns that downvote things on here for some trivial reason, or because it's not perfect in your eyes, also go to furry conventions and

    No.
    But the upvote is there to say "I like this." Why wouldn't the downvote be there to say "I don't like this?" If I don't like something I see, I click the button. It's not that deep

  • |
  • 6
  • post #137372
    36 78 10 Q

    redpanda2025 said:
    I'm just curious, do you clowns that downvote things on here for some trivial reason, or because it's not perfect in your eyes, also go to furry conventions and complain about fursuits that aren't perfect in some way? A loose thread, or maybe the character is out of proportion, but maybe it's supposed to be that way ... instead of liking the wonderful variety and creativity of those who put work into things like that? Do you do that? Just wondering....

    I agree, and normally I wouldn't like this, but the more I watch, the more I'm interested

  • |
  • 1
  • post #137372
    36 78 10 Q

    I'm just curious, do you clowns that downvote things on here for some trivial reason, or because it's not perfect in your eyes, also go to furry conventions and complain about fursuits that aren't perfect in some way? A loose thread, or maybe the character is out of proportion, but maybe it's supposed to be that way ... instead of liking the wonderful variety and creativity of those who put work into things like that? Do you do that? Just wondering....

    Updated by mlem


    User received a record for the contents of this message.
  • |
  • 3
  • post #136306
    182 281 8 E

    pachurisu said:
    I thought it's "tag what you see", not "tag what you discovered on another platform"?

    Sure that makes sense the majority of the time, I think this situation is a little different. Because the person who made this image also gave out the prompt to make this image and it uses "young" and "child" a couple of time each. So I can understand why it was taken down and surprised it's back up.

  • |
  • -4
  • post #132331
    294 505 2 E
    45 85 2 E
    post #137372
    36 78 10 Q
    post #137372
    36 78 10 Q
    post #137260
    162 281 3 E

    peche said:
    I like it, but the left and right legs are not visible, is that on purpose?

    Even I have no idea where the legs should go in this pose - the AI had zero chance. Let's just say they're sitting on a very specialized chair with built-in leg holes

  • |
  • 1
  • post #137359
    103 159 2 E
    post #137361
    118 172 3 E
    post #137105
    87 155 2 E
    post #137315
    130 205 4 E

    sugi said:
    Tropius, obviously. Other half is harder, but the feet, colouration, and segmentation are a dead giveaway for Grotle.

    Yes for Tropius 😁
    And honestly your second guess would be a better candidate than the one I actually used in the prompt >_<
    It was Blaziken, but since both pokemon are verrrrry different I guess one of the two has been slightly sidelined :-\

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #137343
    273 414 4 E

    Frame rate reminds of the movie Rudolph the red nosed reindeer, maybe just put a toy or puppet lora over it

  • |
  • 1
  • post #135771
    562 978 13 E
    post #137315
    130 205 4 E

    Tropius, obviously. Other half is harder, but the feet, colouration, and segmentation are a dead giveaway for Grotle.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #135021
    560 993 16 E
    post #134269
    486 845 6 E
    post #124655
    635 1.1k 3 E
    post #136707
    259 390 2 E
    post #137332
    124 170 1 Q
    post #129993
    720 1.4k 16 E

    dixonuranus said:
    I'd like to see this without the hands

    99% of your comments are telling people what to do and what to gen LMAO. Calm down and gen stuff yourself lil bro

  • |
  • 2
  • post #137343
    273 414 4 E

    woah woah take it easy there MFU. if you start animating, the fuckin sky is gonna fall

  • |
  • 2
  • post #109979
    225 377 2 E
    post #137141
    115 200 1 E
    127 211 2 E
    post #137283
    263 447 1 E
    post #136787
    36 56 1 E
    post #137314
    139 231 6 E
    post #137293
    240 364 1 Q