Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    159 213 5 E

    I was just offering an explanation to the first poster based on the guidelines. I shouldn't have said anything. Lesson learned.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125715
    306 485 6 E
    159 213 5 E

    cadwaladar said:
    The guidelines go beyond missing / extra parts. I'm pretty sure the resolution is too low, and the animation is wonky.

    I agree the guidelines go beyond ... sometimes beyond reasonable, posts are nit picked for little errors get deleted. The result of these deletions is evident in the fading quality of some posts ... I mean why spend the time on something that's at risk of "not meeting guidelines". So rather than make an image as lifelike and detailed as possible, a simple cartoon image is more likely to remain. These deletions seem counter productive to the site.

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
  • post #125726
    395 682 5 E
    post #125590
    117 164 1 E
    post #125687
    267 453 1 E
    post #125721
    14 7 1 S

    that goofy watermark using a generic pre-installed font ruined it, why would you add that lol.
    At least use a decent font lmao

  • |
  • 4
  • post #125662
    230 354 4 E
    post #125703
    257 407 4 E
    2 2 1 E
    post #125540
    50 46 7 S

    Your background characters are better than some foreground character in certain posts. Well done!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125382
    89 160 2 E

    Yes! Finally some good art of Louis with top vibes. Don't get me wrong, I love Louis as a power bottom, but i love to see him as a top sometimes too.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #125712
    41 34 1 S
    post #125711
    29 24 2 S

    Toast is the most important bread of the day, even being late for the "Lewd Photo Buyers, LLC" investors meeting your toast is with you.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #119549
    47 49 2 E
    post #125683
    210 368 3 E
    post #125676
    58 87 6 Q

    ramblingrenegade said:
    Yes but remember this site strives for perfection and would delete her with 3 fingers

    What makes you think that? Three fingers on both hands is completely fine.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125713
    104 116 5 E
    post #125567
    276 472 2 E
    post #125715
    306 485 6 E
    post #125567
    276 472 2 E

    Geez whoever flagged this is being quite anal. I've seen worse clipping issues in a Bethesda game. This was extremely taxing to see why it was flagged. Just contribute to the thick lines around the hands, legs, and ears as just shadows or fur.

    If it's the black fuzzy part near the shaft base, that's the tail. It's not disconnected from the body, the base of the tail may very well be behind the cock.

    This is extremely well made and should remain up.

  • |
  • 6
  • post #125682
    127 189 2 E
    post #125556
    13 18 1 E
    post #125667
    336 512 5 E
    post #125711
    29 24 2 S
    post #125349
    363 565 8 E

    I'm not normally a canine cookie fan, but you make a convincing argument. Huff 0.0

  • |
  • 2
  • post #41456
    38 67 1 E
    post #125690
    431 718 1 E
    post #125548
    180 296 4 E

    kemao12 said:
    So what? Tomorrow morning she'll be just an ordinary girl again. A princess, but an ordinary one.

    I see no issues

  • |
  • 3
  • post #125566
    187 306 2 E
    post #125662
    230 354 4 E
    post #125673
    159 250 2 E

    I like the pose and the characters. Just a few gripes. The major ones: One is above...the other is: Is he biting her ear? It's just... gone.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125620
    191 278 6 E
    post #125540
    50 46 7 S

    jelloponies said:
    Even nailed the background characters. Well done!

    powerhead said:
    Great work as always!

    denatural said:
    Not a single tiny artifact in the background, you did amazing job!

    aaaa so happy for all the support this time around, Thanks! Was my first time working with humans, and glad to actually do decently at it! Really happy it's actually getting recognition too

  • |
  • 1
  • post #125620
    191 278 6 E
    post #125573
    119 220 4 E
    post #125682
    127 189 2 E
    post #125676
    58 87 6 Q

    ramblingrenegade said:
    Yes but remember this site strives for perfection and would delete her with 3 fingers

    Pls mod gods grant this 3 fingered fox your mercy.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125639
    150 230 1 E
    post #116428
    200 333 5 E
    37 52 3 Q
    post #62116
    122 186 4 E

    quicklime said:
    Technically everything but his WIS and INT improved...

    What kind of follow-up are you expecting then?

    That was 7 months ago.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125605
    63 81 7 S
    post #125587
    104 196 1 E
    post #125374
    132 198 6 E
    post #125618
    216 404 1 E

    Need more like thise maybe if can something with an x ray view or cum vomiting

  • |
  • -4
  • post #125674
    293 520 5 E

    Excuse me as I head-canon these two into a brother and trans sister who like to have fun and don't give two fucks what ya'll think. 🔥

  • |
  • -2
  • post #125589
    224 368 1 E
    post #125649
    91 137 1 Q
    post #125667
    336 512 5 E
    post #125672
    71 117 2 E

    Did she have a really bad experience with sharp objects or is she a construct, kind of like the Frankenstein monster?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125673
    159 250 2 E
    post #125674
    293 520 5 E
    37 52 3 Q
    post #125675
    340 646 1 E
    post #125651
    309 499 5 E
    post #125676
    58 87 6 Q

    qadisa said:
    Quick reminder Diane Foxington is SUPPOSED to only have 3 fingers (excluding thumbs). I got into an argument with a friend over this the other day.

    Yes but remember this site strives for perfection and would delete her with 3 fingers

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125676
    58 87 6 Q

    Quick reminder Diane Foxington is SUPPOSED to only have 3 fingers (excluding thumbs). I got into an argument with a friend over this the other day.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125663
    111 221 1 E
    post #125662
    230 354 4 E
    post #125667
    336 512 5 E
    post #124440
    141 202 1 E
    post #125003
    143 221 4 E

    minco said:
    Thank you! I put more work into this piece than any of my others, but I also had the most fun with it <3

    What're you using to gen?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #125655
    6 21 2 Q
    post #125632
    42 58 1 Q
    post #125654
    119 210 1 E
    post #125658
    132 205 1 Q
    post #125655
    6 21 2 Q
    post #125547
    100 160 1 Q
    post #125349
    363 565 8 E
    post #125335
    85 131 1 E
    post #125596
    295 502 1 E
    post #125349
    363 565 8 E

    hammapajamma said:
    Damn, that's a lot of fur detail and mostly going in sensible directions! Nice, this looks pretty awesome.

    Btw, this is just an observation but is it me, or has the amount of canine pussies increased tenfold now that people don't necessarily have to find an artist who's willing to draw them? Directors are going absolutely crazy with this stuff. 😆

    Especially on anthros. They were moderately rare even on ferals before image gen became a thing, but anthros? Needle, haystack.

    Thank you!

    😂 I think you're right, they definitely seem more common here than on 621!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #125349
    363 565 8 E
    post #125555
    146 235 4 E