Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #121608
    104 174 1 E
    post #121845
    129 234 1 E
    post #121833
    71 110 1 E
    post #121850
    369 587 3 E
    post #121719
    208 331 2 E
    post #121652
    177 294 1 E
    post #58517
    150 256 1 E
    post #59955
    163 308 2 E
    post #95480
    231 361 3 E

    Boltz

    Member

    Now I understand why all the dogs wanted Georgette... look at this beauty

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #100256
    172 248 2 E
    post #121851
    345 569 4 E
    post #121733
    90 130 1 S
    post #121817
    128 193 1 S
    post #121851
    345 569 4 E
    post #121777
    178 290 1 E
    post #121754
    191 373 1 E
    post #121766
    191 313 1 E
    post #121703
    171 325 1 E
    post #121747
    280 451 5 E
    post #111757
    91 150 2 E
    post #121676
    196 328 1 E
    post #62895
    56 103 2 E
    post #121855
    105 129 2 S
    post #121846
    76 113 1 S

    Nagiman90

    Member

    She is such a cutie. Nerdy glasses, shy attitude, tiny tits, she's just the perfect little nerdy girl next door.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #118494
    34 43 4 E
    post #121855
    105 129 2 S
    post #121662
    51 57 1 Q
    post #121841
    115 188 2 E

    Vargrklaw

    Member

    ironhorse said:
    this is I believe the third time these were re-posted ... wondering what the problem is with these images ... just curious

    Anomalies and watermark/signatures that I missed and cleaned up.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #121844
    64 104 1 Q
    post #121841
    115 188 2 E

    IRONHORSE

    Member

    this is I believe the third time these were re-posted ... wondering what the problem is with these images ... just curious

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #121762
    216 366 2 E
    109 151 2 E
    post #121701
    13 9 2 S
    post #121668
    87 127 2 Q
    post #119934
    104 100 7 Q
    post #121802
    11 12 2 E
    post #121710
    66 68 2 S
    post #121759
    173 275 3 E
    post #121798
    14 29 1 E

    jons

    Member

    Look, I think they were onto something. I'd have liked to see more of this Snivy

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #121751
    140 256 1 E
    post #121673
    292 499 1 E
    post #121210
    110 178 1 E
    post #121532
    48 67 1 Q

    BoShamp95

    Member

    Man, I came across her bad time in my life cause some problems with her story. I didn’t see the warnings at the beginning of the video so my fault but yeah.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #121688
    233 410 1 E
    post #121745
    112 184 3 Q
    post #121740
    157 235 4 E
    post #121583
    191 329 3 E

    Zaddha

    Member

    chaos475 said:
    Your style is something very unique. I adore each and every one of your generations. Please - keep them coming!

    This is the artist snowskau's style, not mine!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #121743
    190 300 6 E

    Namsi

    Member

    Dang, thats good!
    Can't afford a card to get any video diffusion model running :(

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #121763
    79 137 3 E
    post #121731
    252 371 7 E

    nosuitnosoul

    Member

    zerphy said:
    my bad, I think it should work now

    I really hope this doesn't get deleted for realism but even if it does just more reason to follow your telegram! Please keep up the great realistic and less-realistic work!

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #121745
    112 184 3 Q
    4 1 1 E
    post #121747
    280 451 5 E

    ClF3

    Member

    mikubraver said:
    Thank god that the wings only show Silhouettes one way. ;3

    Well, can't exactly show a silhouette of someone when there's no light source to cast their shadow in that direction.

    Although at the angle of the only know source of illumination here, one can argue that their shadow shouldn't reach unless they were right up against the wing.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #121759
    173 275 3 E
    post #121503
    95 161 2 Q
    post #110412
    33 46 2 Q
    post #121731
    252 371 7 E
    post #121745
    112 184 3 Q
    102 182 1 E
    post #121731
    252 371 7 E
    post #121713
    537 966 4 E
    post #121731
    252 371 7 E
    post #121655
    424 697 8 E

    Meh6

    Member

    Wow, this is amazing! If you don't mind me asking, what model did you use for this? Did you also use some additional loras, embeddings or styles? I would love to try this for myself

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #121740
    157 235 4 E
    post #121747
    280 451 5 E
    post #121722
    229 420 4 E

    WhereWolf

    Member

    Well fortunately I work from home. So I drop everything and *run* to the bedroom to help my hot bunny gf who is clearly in dis-dress. :P

  • |
  • 3
    •
    109 151 2 E
    post #121665
    39 51 2 S

    crashbandit

    Member

    heavengosthh said:
    Hello,
    might I ask if you have an automated way to generate the generation metadata present in the description ?

    It is automated. ComfyUI saves the workflow metadata with the file. My actual setup is a bit more complicated than this, but basically I have a process which reads the metadata attached to the image and generates the description. It also populates some of the tags.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #121731
    252 371 7 E
    post #121668
    87 127 2 Q
    post #121128
    18 25 1 E
    post #121195
    17 27 2 E
    post #121609
    23 37 2 E
    post #121701
    13 9 2 S
    post #121665
    39 51 2 S

    heavengosthh

    Member

    Hello,
    might I ask if you have an automated way to generate the generation metadata present in the description ?

  • |
  • 0
    •