Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #116983
    231 415 6 E

    hammapajamma said:
    I didn't, but it's typically seen as unpolite to ask for alt versions without at least giving some commentary on the one that's there. More so if it's short-form like "other version plz", which just sounds a bit ungrateful.

    Hm, yeah, true, I can see how it can be seen as unpolite now, you got a point

  • |
  • 0
  • post #113610
    30 40 3 S
    post #117094
    108 163 5 Q

    thataustrian said:
    Trailer park possums, always liked the possum girl ngl, auntie is packing heat

    Auntie has a pistol, too. 10/10 would accept that dinner invite.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #116125
    502 889 12 E

    jorble said:
    Bruh this is a website featuring primarily AI Furry porn, no one cares about your political agendas.

    Well.... in this case, it could be something in universe.

    All Cops Are Bitches. And they want the D.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #117115
    171 315 1 Q
    post #117112
    443 904 5 E
    post #117094
    108 163 5 Q
    post #117095
    62 77 3 S
    post #117092
    104 115 2 S
    post #117104
    348 600 5 E

    damnedfurry said:
    Animation's good, but that cock size/length...lol

    Yeah, for some reason the models can't (or at least I can't make them) generate the tip of the penis, so when character moves its head/butt it just keeps extending...
    Till it looks like the guy has been eating viagra for breakfast :p

  • |
  • 4
  • post #117104
    348 600 5 E
    post #117095
    62 77 3 S
    post #117056
    87 138 2 E

    falsgart said:
    Starfish jam, my favorite!

    That model had like, no concept of peanuts.
    giving it just the promt peanut made it create cats.
    This star of maybe roasted peanuts melted together is as close as it'd let me get.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #117094
    108 163 5 Q
    post #117019
    214 410 7 E

    googous said:
    Clearer. Less grainy. They look lofi(meaning low fidelity or grainy/unclear) but not in a good way. And to be clear, I'm not trying to complain. It's still very good.

    https://limewire.com/d/kRZ4b#5rFJybiTeB

    Look you think that one is better? If not it probally somenthing with the upscaler for the original image

  • |
  • 1
  • post #117019
    214 410 7 E

    googous said:
    Clearer. Less grainy. They look lofi(meaning low fidelity or grainy/unclear) but not in a good way. And to be clear, I'm not trying to complain. It's still very good.

    I know man, I didn't take anything as a complaint, I do everything online, so I don't understand much of the terms, about lofi, when this post is deleted (it probably will be) I'll try to redo it using a similar image but changing some things like trying to change the size of the image, then fix the quality and do the same after the video (the problem I saw with this was that it ends up erasing some details)

  • |
  • 2
  • post #117019
    214 410 7 E

    beerwolf said:
    There's a ribbon growing off his foot that seems to be leaking something. :P

    I really hadn't seen that part, the more I watch the worse this video gets :(

  • |
  • 0
  • post #117076
    385 695 4 E
    post #97253
    367 682 2 E

    Yes! She has taken her pants after a long workday to sit on my face… her dirty pussy and ass is the best reward for me!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #117076
    385 695 4 E
    post #117076
    385 695 4 E
    post #117066
    496 913 5 E

    Incredible! What do you use? I'm guessing SD/Wan local gen? I can only use online img2vid with basic prompts.
    I'm finding it impossible to get any kind of penetration, thrusting, sucking, or stroking in my videos. Looping is tough too.

  • |
  • 1
  • 71 131 1 E
    post #117056
    87 138 2 E
    post #117085
    66 74 1 S
    31 40 3 Q
    post #116874
    154 272 2 E
    post #117080
    154 253 2 E
    post #117066
    496 913 5 E

    This is the third time he's been captured this week. We're starting to think he's doing it on purpose.

  • |
  • 8
  • post #117080
    154 253 2 E
    post #116830
    88 171 2 E
    post #117075
    263 451 2 E
    post #116865
    349 633 2 E
    post #116983
    231 415 6 E

    kaltingale said:
    Why are they getting downvoted? Even if I'm not going to do a female version, I don't see anything wrong with asking for it. What's the issue here?

    I didn't, but it's typically seen as impolite to ask for alt versions without at least giving some commentary on the one that's there. More so if it's short-form like "other version plz", which just sounds a bit ungrateful.

    Updated

  • |
  • 6
  • post #117004
    112 151 2 E
    post #117020
    128 179 1 E
    post #116905
    269 516 2 E
    post #117066
    496 913 5 E
    post #117066
    496 913 5 E
    post #117028
    246 395 2 E
    post #75416
    29 39 1 S
    post #117068
    155 254 1 E

    Prob gonna get removed since the first one in the series did, trying to dispute it but waiting on a reply

  • |
  • 5
  • post #116843
    66 61 13 S
    post #37267
    74 109 2 E
    post #116605
    267 511 4 E

    Could you do one with a human male instead of the fox?Same with the previous image with the hot female bear.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #116493
    82 107 5 S

    oldhroft said:
    This is a sure way to make the birb blush even more =D

    I'd want to hear the nervous chirping. It's sure to be adorable.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #116931
    237 382 6 E

    that must feel weird for both of them. now Im interested.

  • |
  • 1
  • 95 120 28 S
    post #117041
    106 187 2 E
    post #115943
    279 437 4 E
    post #116866
    321 624 1 E
    post #116958
    116 226 2 E
    post #117014
    99 156 1 E
    post #117040
    146 197 5 E

    I am a BIG fan of the new direction they went with the natives in this Indiana Jones reboot.

    Edit: not sure why the down votes. If this was offensive in some way, it wasn't intended. 😥

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
  • post #117004
    112 151 2 E
    post #117019
    214 410 7 E

    dr_plant said:
    uhh, english is not my native language can you explain it to me? you mean it being rougher?

    Clearer. Less grainy. They look lofi(meaning low fidelity or grainy/unclear) but not in a good way. And to be clear, I'm not trying to complain. It's still very good.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #112027
    220 432 3 E
    post #115798
    190 327 2 E
    post #116491
    791 1.5k 17 E
    post #116552
    319 564 4 E
    post #116619
    111 174 1 Q
    post #116983
    231 415 6 E
    post #116701
    69 117 1 E
    post #117030
    51 60 1 Q

    Another good one. There are some slight errors with the water and chain, but I'm impressed with what you're pulling off with AI.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #116851
    244 410 6 E
    post #116970
    70 93 3 E

    Wow, back with a winner. Her chest is a tad too human for me, maybe, but there's no such thing as reptile breasts, so can't really fault the AI.

    Otherwise quite believable without going creepy, imo.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #116350
    114 123 11 E

    caserus said:
    Work in chiropractic office hearing pops, snaps, and all sorts of gross sounds all day... can't handle fireworks.

    She actually works in the school as a nurse. She's always shown as having no idea what to do, so I think the joke is that chiropractors have little to no real medical training, and she's not even that, she's only an assistant to one.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #116705
    43 20 4 S
    post #116949
    225 397 2 E
    post #116012
    168 276 2 E
    post #116957
    197 332 1 E
    post #116956
    94 93 4 S
    31 40 3 Q
    post #117021
    235 336 4 Q