Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #99830
    79 115 5 Q
    post #68948
    93 141 1 E
    post #72418
    194 317 1 E
    post #63893
    81 123 2 E
    post #107513
    90 141 1 Q
    post #49371
    47 73 1 E
    post #57333
    144 202 3 E
    82 136 1 Q
    post #112943
    168 254 2 E
    post #116148
    120 149 4 Q
    post #112918
    112 188 2 E
    post #65683
    36 57 1 E
    post #116061
    285 434 12 E

    yliaster said:

    ahahaha no, let's not conflate things that aren't really related. If you have at least one eye and enough GPU horsepower to kill god then you can use genAI. Beyond that you just dump it into an image editor, liquefy/smudge out dumb stuff, and pull the lever. Pull the lever. Pull the lever. Until you get what you want.

    Well, you're definitely producing some quality art regardless of the method so thank you for that.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #76356
    57 99 2 E
    post #80565
    46 52 1 Q
    post #116035
    219 355 1 E
    post #60531
    68 92 1 Q
    post #45201
    75 122 1 S
    post #44249
    116 208 1 E
    post #8092
    80 134 1 E
    post #116137
    82 102 2 Q
    post #47433
    40 47 1 E
    post #107039
    138 254 1 E
    post #113337
    107 198 1 E
    post #116196
    19 33 1 E
    post #115593
    172 329 5 E
    post #116177
    285 541 4 E
    post #116124
    212 308 2 Q

    She's absolutely beautiful! Could you please share the prompt and settings you used? I'd love to try and create something similar.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #114976
    230 370 3 E

    gobai said:
    yeah sadly, i'm also not really happy with the speed.
    But for a first experiment it came out good.

    Amp playback speed

  • |
  • 0
  • post #116106
    58 91 1 E
    post #116015
    176 232 6 E
    post #116181
    530 916 4 E
    post #115970
    139 224 2 E
    post #116061
    285 434 12 E
    post #116070
    271 344 12 Q
    post #116124
    212 308 2 Q
    84 110 4 E
    84 110 4 E
    post #116160
    277 472 2 E
    post #86892
    120 197 1 E
    post #116022
    159 310 1 E
    post #116070
    271 344 12 Q
    post #115885
    68 93 6 E

    kingk said:
    I think this one's a lot better than the other horse, personally. That one looked purely human apart from the head, feet and tail.

    Yup, her coloration was nicer, more equine contrast, but it was that lack of fur that diminished the picture.
    I still wish the model was more more feral waist down. Equines don't need any improvement in that department.

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
  • post #114172
    56 47 2 Q
    post #86559
    100 166 1 E
    post #116061
    285 434 12 E

    neta said:
    Any more information about the director?

    it me

    fluffscaler said:
    You should upload the cross section version of this too, that one was peak

    I would/will but I realized there's an oopsie fuckie with the anatomy that I gotta fix first

    ilmpbx said:
    This is the sort of thing that can happen when a high cal artist gets their hands on an AI toolset.

    ahahaha no, let's not conflate things that aren't really related. If you have at least one eye and enough GPU horsepower to kill god then you can use genAI. Beyond that you just dump it into an image editor, liquefy/smudge out dumb stuff, and pull the lever. Pull the lever. Pull the lever. Until you get what you want.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #27449
    29 62 7 Q
    post #115734
    155 273 2 E
    post #115965
    97 131 1 Q

    He knows he's got legs. Those stockings really show off how shapely they are, lol.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #115937
    120 192 6 Q

    plapenjoyer said:
    Oops! If I had any reading comprehension my original comment would have said "he is not a grower" :c

    I've got a pretty big image set lined up! Refining them into an acceptable quality just takes a little time :D

    Lol, it's fine, I got what you meant. ^_^ Based on the recent images, he's not allowed to be a grower XD

  • |
  • 2
  • post #116117
    64 115 1 E
    post #116161
    258 457 3 E
    54 70 1 E
    84 110 4 E
    post #116160
    277 472 2 E
    post #114691
    44 44 4 S
    post #116007
    127 194 4 E
    post #116154
    218 336 1 E
    post #116032
    55 72 5 E
    post #116146
    73 93 1 Q
    post #116015
    176 232 6 E
    post #116148
    120 149 4 Q
    79 122 1 E
    post #110974
    197 328 5 E

    velric_olrand said:
    In my humble opinion, this should be e6ai’s mascot.

    I upvoted this and after only one other upvoted it I got to say that this comment did not get enough love.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #113776
    213 357 2 E

    "collaborative_sex".... Might just be the best tag on the site...

    These two seriously give me the feels.

  • |
  • 0
  • 84 110 4 E

    More her please!

    Love the border collie girls of this quality...

    Sequences like this also magnify the sexy.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #115301
    251 478 3 E

    fuzzypawz said:
    Stuff like this make me question my sexuality. I mean, who wouldnt want that kind of treatment from nick? Especially looking like that 😍

    before nick, sigmax's bambi had me questioning mine

  • |
  • 2
  • post #102774
    135 224 3 E

    notjohnllama said:
    If he really were the "Goat" he would put Pilgor as his true sex, female, because Pilgor is female

    What? Pilgor from Goatsim and the real goat theyre based on and the one in Fortnite are all male.

  • |
  • -1
  • post #115043
    62 124 1 Q
    post #116061
    285 434 12 E

    This is the sort of thing that can happen when a high cal artist gets their hands on an AI toolset.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #116137
    82 102 2 Q

    The whole set is soooo awesome, can't wait for a potential panty-less version, that would be gorgeous seeing her black body in all it's glory with some colored accents _(꒪ཀ꒪」∠)_

    But even like this already - really stunning σ(≧ε≦o)

  • |
  • 2
  • post #116077
    299 525 3 E
    post #116061
    285 434 12 E
    post #116116
    267 459 4 E