Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #112484
    27 24 3 S
    post #114547
    286 490 4 E
    26 37 2 E
    0 0 1 E
    127 216 2 E
    post #113760
    427 715 7 E

    I mean I half expected Sylveon to eat out Tania, but what happened was good. I think Sylveon should "return the favor" while Owen rails Sylveon again.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #114377
    397 646 4 E

    blake81 said:
    Nerd Facts: Cheetahs aren't the smallest of large felines, but the largest of small felines. They're very much upscaled housecats built specifically for GOTTA GO FAST.

    What's more, they're the most chill wild cats around humans and can still meow.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #114376
    322 498 3 E

    They'll get sloppier under the tail, tho I'm sure they would be quite happy to have their muzzles as messy, at very least. It looks like the storm will last a long time after all. :P
    I hope they'd not exhaust a lucky man too much.

    That's really good remaster, with a good angle to show off their shapely legs and sexy, creampied rumps. I'm happy how their muzzles turned out, they look very friendly and inviting to give them good pets.
    The background make you feel you're in a cave or under a rock shelf by the cliff. Nicely done!

    Hah, I would love to see a dragoness calling dibs on a lone traveller and give him plenty of reasons to stay.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #114351
    104 131 2 Q

    YEP... and to make up for it, I"m now going to HELP you SCRUB
    .. aaaaaaaall over..

  • |
  • 1
  • post #114528
    164 268 1 E
    post #114255
    84 145 2 E

    deltacore said:
    I'm all in for pony x dragon. But I dont like her legs. It looks like a wierd mix of pony and anthro.

    Very good feedback. I am inclined to agree with you after a fresh observation

  • |
  • 1
  • 102 145 2 E
    post #114535
    373 676 2 E
    post #114535
    373 676 2 E
    post #114444
    409 695 4 E

    zanator said:
    AI still doesn't understand what horses' legs should look like)

    I've found that pretty much all models struggle with quadruped hindquarter anatomy when you prompt for NSFW, especially unusual poses. I don't think the datasets have enough feral poses for the models to fully distinguish between posture and anatomy. I've had some success negatively prompting things associated with human poses like "feet" and "perineum", but it won't fix it entirely.

    But that said, this post has rather convincing anatomy. I've seen much worse.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #114418
    249 412 2 E
    post #113462
    122 200 4 E
    post #114486
    18 9 1 S
    post #114519
    208 352 2 E
    87 144 18 E

    shanti said:
    The e621 version is better.
    There... It's all there.

    Why do you feel the need to comment that?

  • |
  • 7
  • post #114496
    119 152 2 E
    87 144 18 E

    sagrael said:
    Seriosly, just add me in blacklist please

    Why would I add you to the blacklist?
    I have nothing against the man!
    (I'm using a translator)

  • |
  • -7
  • 87 144 18 E
    87 144 18 E

    sagrael said:
    If you dont like pics with human males, why not just use a blacklist? You can add me in blacklist too, I dont mind, you dont have even 1 of my posts in favorite anyways

    I have nothing against the man.

  • |
  • -7
  • 87 144 18 E

    shanti said:
    The e621 version is better.
    There... It's all there.

    If you dont like pics with human males, why not just use a blacklist? You can add me in blacklist too, I dont mind, you dont have even 1 of my posts in favorite anyways

    Updated

  • |
  • 8
  • post #114508
    161 194 2 Q
    post #114343
    229 385 4 E
    post #114448
    110 156 1 E
    post #104588
    106 148 5 E
    post #114493
    586 1.0k 4 E

    Wow! Just wow! Looks very realistic. I love that his dick is somewhat average and not a giant brick. And her gripping labia is also very nice.

  • |
  • 16
  • post #114444
    409 695 4 E
    post #109534
    184 268 6 Q
    post #114444
    409 695 4 E
    post #114488
    169 251 9 E
    post #114246
    47 72 1 E
    post #103749
    137 222 4 S
    post #114493
    586 1.0k 4 E
    post #114459
    46 95 1 E
    post #114488
    169 251 9 E
    post #114441
    100 182 1 E

    I saw when this got removed for having 3 fingers. Smh. I see alot of bad ai stuff here and it was weird to see the first one get removed

  • |
  • 1
  • post #85787
    389 663 7 E

    I'm surprised this made it here. The pussy stroke magically adds another finger.

    horsefucker5 said:
    Maybe the AI doesn't recognize animal pussy, because this is uncensored AF

    Exactly this. I ran a few things and as long as it wasn't something vanilla porn-like, it didn't detect it as anything bad. The detection model was created using far too innocent a dataset.
    Hyena with plump, black labia? Sure.
    A bear in panties? NOPE!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #113312
    84 82 5 E
    post #113696
    81 136 4 E
    post #114488
    169 251 9 E

    motelsaint said:
    They aren't brothers through blood, purely through their bond together. Brothers from another mother basically.

    Ahh, so brothers in the spiritual sense, gotcha.
    Still, I love 'em. They're great 💜

  • |
  • 2
  • post #114488
    169 251 9 E

    sergalbutt said:

    Fuck yes


    Also, I do have to wonder: is this an actual incest or a technical incest situation?

    Not that I'm bothered either way, I just want to understand your adorable characters more 💜 (and for tag reasons :P)

    They aren't brothers through blood, purely through their bond together. Brothers from another mother basically.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #114489
    121 170 2 Q
    post #114488
    169 251 9 E

    Fuck yes


    Also, I do have to wonder: is this an actual incest or a technical incest situation?

    Not that I'm bothered either way, I just want to understand your adorable characters more 💜 (and for tag reasons :P)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #114363
    50 109 1 E
    post #114474
    52 80 2 E
    post #114371
    66 130 4 E

    caballus_j said:
    I think the telegram channel link doesn't work anymore.
    Is there a new chat?

    The Telegram channel link is a permalink so it should never not work.

    I suggest checking the settings in the app
    Settings -> Chat Settings -> Show 18+ Content
    And if you can't do it in the app, if you log in via a web browser, you can enable it there and that setting carries over to the app.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #114424
    43 44 1 S
    post #114446
    73 106 1 E
    post #114444
    409 695 4 E
    post #114411
    177 278 2 E
    post #114234
    126 231 1 E
    post #114443
    145 234 2 E
    16 16 1 Q
    post #114248
    168 302 4 E
    post #98512
    272 471 5 E

    kemowolf said:
    One of these days, male creators will learn you can't pierce the cervix with a dick, and if you did, you would cause permanent damage to the woman.

    And yet we can't stop seeing furry art with the woman in rapture with an internal to show her cervix being punctured.

    Yes
    But some kinds of canines can enter the tip of their urethra into the cervix. But not like on the art.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114269
    233 385 1 E
    post #114278
    142 229 2 E
    22 24 1 S
    post #109456
    62 96 13 E
    post #114386
    87 132 1 E
    post #113753
    182 249 3 E

    fuck yes. Eyes looks some creepy, but its already so good

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114391
    104 175 1 E

    Don't know if I'm being drawn in by her behind or her eyes. ;3

    Just something about green glowing eyes really pull you in.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #114418
    249 412 2 E
    97 175 1 E
    106 0 7 E

    haroldleviticusgrimm said:
    There's a little face above her tailhole. 0_0

    Damn, that's embarrassing. Is it possible to directly replace it with a fixed image direct or do I have to flag it for deletion or how do I do?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #113127
    125 174 4 Q
    post #114411
    177 278 2 E

    Nah, one isn't enough, it'll be at least 5 bangs to make sure she's howling and walking funny.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114179
    34 46 1 E
    post #114371
    66 130 4 E
    106 0 7 E
    post #113872
    71 92 1 E